Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,936 Founders Club
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    “72% of republican supporting respondents said Arabic numerals should not be on the curriculum, compared to 40% of democrats”

    Speaks volumes.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited May 2019
    Fuck those Arabs and their numbers and shit.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,850 Standard Supporter

    “72% of republican supporting respondents said Arabic numerals should not be on the curriculum, compared to 40% of democrats”

    Speaks volumes.

    Bomb making formulas and shit.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    And surveys say people agree with AOC. all proof that people are ignorant retards.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    “72% of republican supporting respondents said Arabic numerals should not be on the curriculum, compared to 40% of democrats”

    Speaks volumes.

    To be fair, it has nothing to do with more democrats actually knowing what Arabic numerals are.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,807 Founders Club
    Sounds like a key issue
  • Doog_de_JourDoog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,020 Standard Supporter
    I blame the “Veep” writers:

    https://youtu.be/embMAtagQiU

    Might as well start getting rid of coffee, toothbrushes, alcohol distillation, guitars...
  • HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,418
    Looks like HHusky cares
  • Doog_de_JourDoog_de_Jour Member Posts: 8,020 Standard Supporter

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    While there are (and have always been) stupid voters, I suspect a lot of this is rooted in a lack of basic history education. The article cited above stated that “The poll did not explain what the term “Arabic numerals” meant.” Plus I suspect the firm that conducted this survey, CivicScince, isn’t exactly pulling a truly representative sample of Americans.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,211

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    While there are (and have always been) stupid voters, I suspect a lot of this is rooted in a lack of basic history education. The article cited above stated that “The poll did not explain what the term “Arabic numerals” meant.” Plus I suspect the firm that conducted this survey, CivicScince, isn’t exactly pulling a truly representative sample of Americans.
    Yes, there are plenty of dumb voters in both parties. But if you look at polling regarding knowledge on the issues, year in and year out on average Republican voters routinely out poll Rats when it comes to knowledge of the issues.

  • USMChawkUSMChawk Member Posts: 1,800

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    I’m very aware there are a lot of stupid people who vote, I visit this board every day. Case in point, here you are.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,950
    Why do you guys always try to frame people who vote democrat as these enlightened people?

    Most Dem voters are poor people. Poor people tend to not be very smart and/or educated.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    While there are (and have always been) stupid voters, I suspect a lot of this is rooted in a lack of basic history education. The article cited above stated that “The poll did not explain what the term “Arabic numerals” meant.” Plus I suspect the firm that conducted this survey, CivicScince, isn’t exactly pulling a truly representative sample of Americans.
    Yes, there are plenty of dumb voters in both parties. But if you look at polling regarding knowledge on the issues, year in and year out on average Republican voters routinely out poll Rats when it comes to knowledge of the issues.

    Link?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,850 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2019
    I'm pretty sure most welfare and other benefits head to the Democrat side. Remember 'Ol LBJ! And I'm posting the clean version....

    "These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again."

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,487 Founders Club
    In my culture we just use dots to correspond to whatever number you need. I'd prefer we do it that way. I will admit, it's a bitch when you have to write any number greater than ten, but there s never too much going on at the res anyway.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,168 Standard Supporter

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    The distribution of stupid people voting is not materially skewed either left or right. Stupid knows no ideological boundary.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    USMChawk said:

    This phone pad shows the difference between what we call Arabic numbers and what are currently used in Arabic countries. Our numbers are actually from India but were introduced via North Africa, which is the reason for the misnomer.



    That being said, the question was clearly designed to elicit the results it achieved so the author can fuck off.

    Nice try. Just admit there are a lot of stupid people that can vote.
    The distribution of stupid people voting is not materially skewed either left or right. Stupid knows no ideological boundary.
    HRYK

Sign In or Register to comment.