Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

OREGON NFL Draft Thread

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,261
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
Swaye's Wigwam
«1

Comments

  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,278
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.
  • Options
    RatherBeBrewingRatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Hunter Renfrow was drafted ahead of Dillon Mitchell.

    Last year Renfrow caught 49 passes for 544 yards and one TD. Mitchell had 75 for 1184 and 10 TDs.

    Mitchell is three inches taller, 20 pounds heavier, and .18 seconds faster in the 40.

    Someone should have come back for their senior year. He wouldn't have had the same stats since not all other WRs will suck as hard in 2019, but this just goes to show that name recognition is important. Mitchell could have also helped himself by learning how to block.
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Good draft for the Ducks considering this class was recruited by Helf.
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic


















    .

    This is actually clever.
  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic

    Hunter Renfrow was drafted ahead of Dillon Mitchell.

    Last year Renfrow caught 49 passes for 544 yards and one TD. Mitchell had 75 for 1184 and 10 TDs.

    Mitchell is three inches taller, 20 pounds heavier, and .18 seconds faster in the 40.

    Someone should have come back for their senior year. He wouldn't have had the same stats since not all other WRs will suck as hard in 2019, but this just goes to show that name recognition is important. Mitchell could have also helped himself by learning how to block.

    I was a little surprised he wasn't picked up by someone in the later rounds after he passed the 40 test at the combine. As a player he's a good WR. Kid makes clutch catches.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Right. Keep telling yourself that.
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes

    Hunter Renfrow was drafted ahead of Dillon Mitchell.

    Last year Renfrow caught 49 passes for 544 yards and one TD. Mitchell had 75 for 1184 and 10 TDs.

    Mitchell is three inches taller, 20 pounds heavier, and .18 seconds faster in the 40.

    Someone should have come back for their senior year. He wouldn't have had the same stats since not all other WRs will suck as hard in 2019, but this just goes to show that name recognition is important. Mitchell could have also helped himself by learning how to block.

    I was a little surprised he wasn't picked up by someone in the later rounds after he passed the 40 test at the combine. As a player he's a good WR. Kid makes clutch catches.
    Mitchell? He was drafted.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Right. Keep telling yourself that.
    Seriously? Wow. Full Sark HIV down there.
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,278
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Right. Keep telling yourself that.
    Seriously? Wow. Full Sark HIV down there.
    Everything is Sark.
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
    That excuse has been rolled out over and over. Quooks weren't even competitive on the road, so how was the north that close.
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
    That excuse has been rolled out over and over. Quooks weren't even competitive on the road, so how was the north that close.
    WA lost 2 on the road in conference and Oregon 3. At the end of the day that’s the record. The reason why Oregon wasn’t competitive in two of them was depth and injuries. The depth is resolved.
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
    That excuse has been rolled out over and over. Quooks weren't even competitive on the road, so how was the north that close.
    WA lost 2 on the road in conference and Oregon 3. At the end of the day that’s the record. The reason why Oregon wasn’t competitive in two of them was depth and injuries. The depth is resolved.
    🤣😂😂
  • Options
    lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
    That excuse has been rolled out over and over. Quooks weren't even competitive on the road, so how was the north that close.
    WA lost 2 on the road in conference and Oregon 3. At the end of the day that’s the record. The reason why Oregon wasn’t competitive in two of them was depth and injuries. The depth is resolved.
    🤣😂😂
    Already have one bet with y’all on the coug game, how about a gentleman’s bet on road game performance?

  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,464
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    lawsandl said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    Kind of funny, but you do realize Oregon lost three starters right?

    I am a little surprised Hollins hasn’t been drafted yet. Amadi is too small and the same with Mitchell on the outside.

    That's awesome your're only replacing 3 guys from a team that finished 4th in the north.

    Seriously, that is the preferred outcome here.
    Cool. How does that relate to the draft shit for brains? I’m also not picking Oregon to win the North next year. My response was to why there weren’t many ducks drafted. Now go back to your blazer board and leave the football talk to the adults.
    If you aren't picking Oregon to win the North then I have nothing to say to you
    I don’t think there is a lot of margin between the top 4. So, I wouldn’t put much confidence in anyone.
    That excuse has been rolled out over and over. Quooks weren't even competitive on the road, so how was the north that close.
    WA lost 2 on the road in conference and Oregon 3. At the end of the day that’s the record. The reason why Oregon wasn’t competitive in two of them was depth and injuries. The depth is resolved.
    🤣😂😂
    Already have one bet with y’all on the coug game, how about a gentleman’s bet on road game performance?

    UO people gentlemen? lol
Sign In or Register to comment.