OFFICIAL NFL Draft Super Thread
Comments
-
Way to go way out on a limb there Gil. I think I'll do the same and pick 20 or 30 guys who were drafted and predict that none of them will likely become NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year. In other news, I will also predict that water remains wet.StrongArmCobra said:
I never said I know what he's going to do in the NFL you idiot. I said the chances of him being NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year and a pro bowler as a rookie are extremely low which is true. I had him rated as a late round pick to UDFA for a long time and got ridiculed for it. Today I was proven right. I love the way you pretend to actually care about Gaskin though, which you don't. You're just desperate to try to take a jab at me any way you can because you're a pathetic loser. You didn't answer my question? How'd Oregon do in the draft?creepycoug said:
The point, dumb dumb, is that you didn't know the NFL Offensive ROTY was going to be the NFL Offensive ROTY. You don't know what Gaskin will do in the NFL. But we do know is that the kid has skills, great acceleration and vision and runs well in traffic. He knows how to get 7 or 8 yards and he's a clutch kid. We do know he was a great back in college. You have no fucking clue how he'll fare as a pro. Just stop already.StrongArmCobra said:
I think the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year is better than Gaskin. Let me know when Gaskin achieves the same thing. Then you'll have an argument.Gwad said:
The lack of data points makes your position unobjective. Your stance is emotional due to him making your girl(moms?) shit herself until proven otherwise.StrongArmCobra said:
Because he is.Gwad said:
How can you calculate Lindsay is better than Gaskin as an absolute statement?StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
I don't care about Gaskin, personally, any more than I care about your degree from UW Tacoma CC. He seems like a good kid, I like that he's a Seattle kid, and I liked his game. I respect what he did for his team and I'm pretty clear that UW has a bunch more in the Loss column if he's not playing for them.
He also has a package of skills, and most importantly the right mindset, to actually make a run of it in the NFL.
But I suppose I should let you do your victory lap tomorrow when you tell everyone that YOU WERE RIGHT when you predicted that the sun would rise in east. Are you aware that you've managed to make like 500 posters, all of whom want everything you say to be correct, hate you nonetheless? Do you have any friends, anywhere? -
But I wouldn't have been wrong if all the things that happened that made what I said wrong didn't happen you fucking idiot!!!!!!!!!!FremontTroll said:
You got ridiculed for insisting Chris Warren would be drafted ahead of Gaskin.StrongArmCobra said:
I never said I know what he's going to do in the NFL you idiot. I said the chances of him being NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year and a pro bowler as a rookie are extremely low which is true. I had him rated as a late round pick to UDFA for a long time and got ridiculed for it. Today I was proven right. I love the way you pretend to actually care about Gaskin though, which you don't. You're just desperate to try to take a jab at me any way you can because you're a pathetic loser. You didn't answer my question? How'd Oregon do in the draft?creepycoug said:
The point, dumb dumb, is that you didn't know the NFL Offensive ROTY was going to be the NFL Offensive ROTY. You don't know what Gaskin will do in the NFL. But we do know is that the kid has skills, great acceleration and vision and runs well in traffic. He knows how to get 7 or 8 yards and he's a clutch kid. We do know he was a great back in college. You have no fucking clue how he'll fare as a pro. Just stop already.StrongArmCobra said:
I think the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year is better than Gaskin. Let me know when Gaskin achieves the same thing. Then you'll have an argument.Gwad said:
The lack of data points makes your position unobjective. Your stance is emotional due to him making your girl(moms?) shit herself until proven otherwise.StrongArmCobra said:
Because he is.Gwad said:
How can you calculate Lindsay is better than Gaskin as an absolute statement?StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
You were wrong. Take the loss. -
Bump diggityStrongArmCobra said:
He's better because he's better. He ran a 4.39 40 at his pro day. He was the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowler. He's one of a select very few undrafted players to ever make a pro bowl. I shouldn't have to go into detail when it's so fucking obvious that he's objectively better than Gaskin. Don't be stupid. I'm not rooting against Gaskin. I hope he makes the roster and has the best NFL career he possibly can but the chances of him being the next Phillip Lindsay are so fucking slim it's not even an argument. This is retarded doog shit. Just drop it. You all were wrong and I was right. That's it. Leave it be.animate said:
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning? -
Those are fucking factual facts! I stand by that post 1000%. Notice I said nothing about college Lindsay being better than college Gaskin. It was an NFL Lindsay versus college Gaskin comparison and Lindsay wins by a mile.creepycoug said:
Bump diggityStrongArmCobra said:
He's better because he's better. He ran a 4.39 40 at his pro day. He was the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowler. He's one of a select very few undrafted players to ever make a pro bowl. I shouldn't have to go into detail when it's so fucking obvious that he's objectively better than Gaskin. Don't be stupid. I'm not rooting against Gaskin. I hope he makes the roster and has the best NFL career he possibly can but the chances of him being the next Phillip Lindsay are so fucking slim it's not even an argument. This is retarded doog shit. Just drop it. You all were wrong and I was right. That's it. Leave it be.animate said:
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning?
PS: You have no fucking life taking the time to dig that up. I know it was not an easy find. Guess you don't have anything better to do tho. -
@creepycoug living rent free in SAC’s headStrongArmCobra said:
Those are fucking factual facts! I stand by that post 1000%. Notice I said nothing about college Lindsay being better than college Gaskin. It was an NFL Lindsay versus college Gaskin comparison and Lindsay wins by a mile.creepycoug said:
Bump diggityStrongArmCobra said:
He's better because he's better. He ran a 4.39 40 at his pro day. He was the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowler. He's one of a select very few undrafted players to ever make a pro bowl. I shouldn't have to go into detail when it's so fucking obvious that he's objectively better than Gaskin. Don't be stupid. I'm not rooting against Gaskin. I hope he makes the roster and has the best NFL career he possibly can but the chances of him being the next Phillip Lindsay are so fucking slim it's not even an argument. This is retarded doog shit. Just drop it. You all were wrong and I was right. That's it. Leave it be.animate said:
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning?
PS: You have no fucking life taking the time to dig that up. I know it was not an easy find. Guess you don't have anything better to do tho.
-
Obviously the other way around. I'm not taking 20 minutes out of my day to dig up old Creepy posts as an attempt at a gotcha moment. 5 seconds to respond, sure. But Creep is on a whole other level. Rent free.FirePete said:
@creepycoug living rent free in SAC’s headStrongArmCobra said:
Those are fucking factual facts! I stand by that post 1000%. Notice I said nothing about college Lindsay being better than college Gaskin. It was an NFL Lindsay versus college Gaskin comparison and Lindsay wins by a mile.creepycoug said:
Bump diggityStrongArmCobra said:
He's better because he's better. He ran a 4.39 40 at his pro day. He was the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowler. He's one of a select very few undrafted players to ever make a pro bowl. I shouldn't have to go into detail when it's so fucking obvious that he's objectively better than Gaskin. Don't be stupid. I'm not rooting against Gaskin. I hope he makes the roster and has the best NFL career he possibly can but the chances of him being the next Phillip Lindsay are so fucking slim it's not even an argument. This is retarded doog shit. Just drop it. You all were wrong and I was right. That's it. Leave it be.animate said:
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning?
PS: You have no fucking life taking the time to dig that up. I know it was not an easy find. Guess you don't have anything better to do tho. -
Imagine caring about this.
-
We call that memory + a search feature in 2019.StrongArmCobra said:
Those are fucking factual facts! I stand by that post 1000%. Notice I said nothing about college Lindsay being better than college Gaskin. It was an NFL Lindsay versus college Gaskin comparison and Lindsay wins by a mile.creepycoug said:
Bump diggityStrongArmCobra said:
He's better because he's better. He ran a 4.39 40 at his pro day. He was the NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowler. He's one of a select very few undrafted players to ever make a pro bowl. I shouldn't have to go into detail when it's so fucking obvious that he's objectively better than Gaskin. Don't be stupid. I'm not rooting against Gaskin. I hope he makes the roster and has the best NFL career he possibly can but the chances of him being the next Phillip Lindsay are so fucking slim it's not even an argument. This is retarded doog shit. Just drop it. You all were wrong and I was right. That's it. Leave it be.animate said:
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning?
PS: You have no fucking life taking the time to dig that up. I know it was not an easy find. Guess you don't have anything better to do tho.
To your point, it did take about 12 seconds.
