OFFICIAL NFL Draft Super Thread
Comments
-
There goes Gaskin to the Dolphins in the 7th round. Good for him and good luck to him making the roster.
-
I think the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year is better than Gaskin. Let me know when Gaskin achieves the same thing. Then you'll have an argument.Gwad said:
The lack of data points makes your position unobjective. Your stance is emotional due to him making your girl(moms?) shit herself until proven otherwise.StrongArmCobra said:
Because he is.Gwad said:
How can you calculate Lindsay is better than Gaskin as an absolute statement?StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL? -
Can we finally ban this idiot? He's so far past providing any value
-
-
Clearly, I provide the best talent evals on the board and am capable of doing so while being unbiased and objective.GreenRiverGatorz said:Can we finally ban this idiot? He's so far past providing any value
-
I'm not one for banning but he should at least donate to the cause if he's gonna spew this must shit.GreenRiverGatorz said:Can we finally ban this idiot? He's so far past providing any value
-
I looked at almost every RB’s stats that was picked before Gaskin. Most did put up big numbers and also have less wear and tear. However, many of them were also small.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
-
Sure, in the later rounds after all the top big backs have already been selected.RoadDawg55 said:
I looked at almost every RB’s stats that was picked before Gaskin. Most did put up big numbers and also have less wear and tear. However, many of them were also small.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
-
This is really weak, I expect more from you (or maybe it's exactly what I expected)StrongArmCobra said:
Stop comparing Gaskin to a an extremely rare instance. He's not Lindsay. He's not going to go undrafted and then become Offensive Rookie of the Year. Just stop. Yes, Phillip Lindsay is better than Gaskin.animate said:
Sounds like Phillip Lindsay.StrongArmCobra said:Hate to say I told you so but I FUCKING TOLD YOU SO! Who am I kidding? I love saying it. Gaskin was a great college player but is not coveted by the NFL. Every draft eligible RB under the sun is getting drafted before him. The NFL wants big backs (215+ pounds). That's what works at the highest level of football both in the NFL and in college. And if you're not a big back you better have elite speed. Gaskin has neither the size or speed the NFL is looking for. That's the reality and what I've been saying for years. Sorry not sorry for being objective. Gaskin's a Husky legend and that's great. But he is and remains a 3-star talent who outperformed his ranking in college but still doesn't have the talent level the NFL covets. Best of luck to him trying to make a roster.
So, you think that Lindsay way better than Gaskin or is much more suited to the NFL?
- Lindsay was a decent college player for a half-decent program (for the years he was at Colorado there anyways)
- his physical measurables are actually less than Gaskin. He's shorter with about the same dimensions.
- Gaskin did more in College than Lindsay did (although if you put Lindsay on UW would he have done as well?)
- he went undrafted, got his shot and made the most of it, good for him.
But this is what you said in response to me ...
"don't bring this example up" and "yeah, Lindsay is better"
Ok.
- why is Lindsay "better" when he did less in college? ... and when his physical measurables are even less than Gaskins?
You have lots of details in most of your posts and try to back them up with your inconsistent logic ... but you have none for me?
- why exactly can't we bring this example up? Because it's inconvenient for you? You have to think to hard to manufacture some obtuse answer or reasoning? -
Browning undrafted. Hahahahahahahahaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahah.
Where is that "2nd round prospect" dude again? @CrimsonDisciple?
