Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

I knew the election was rigged...

MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
Swaye's Wigwam
in Tug Tavern
I just didn’t think it would be Hillary bitching about it 2 1/2 years later.

http://time.com/5574159/hillary-clinton-edward-felsenthal-time-100-summit/

Imagine not accepting the results of a presidential election.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    Obama chuckled as he told Trump to stop whining because there was no way the election could be rigged

    That would be the same Obama who was in charge when Russia bought those Facebook ads

    Hilary said Trump should have been indicted

    Ironic

    Tone deaf to say the least.

    El oh el. These fucks.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/18/trump-rigged-election-obama-warning-america-divided
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    You guys feel better?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    Did you lie as much about Hillary's investigation as you did Trump Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    #aclockworkshill #rightontim #HondoBros #lapdog
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    Yes. What’s your point? So you agree whining 2 1/2 years later after suggesting not accepting the results of the election was a threat to the nation is embarrassing. Got it.
    Agreed, is embarrassing Hillary is still whining about losing. And it's more embarrassing you people are still whining about Hillary and Obama.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    Yes. What’s your point? So you agree whining 2 1/2 years later after suggesting not accepting the results of the election was a threat to the nation is embarrassing. Got it.
    Agreed, is embarrassing Hillary is still whining about losing. And it's more embarrassing you people are still whining about Hillary and Obama.
    Yes, mocking Hillary who was whining to Time just this week is “whining”. Only in the mind of a butt hurt leftist.

    Trump is a piece of shit. But mocking the hypocrisy is worth it.

    I love me some schadenfreude
    Hillary lost.. Get over it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,327
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

    With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

    So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:

    In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.

    Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

    In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

    To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

    As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.


    EXONERATED

    Fuck off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

    With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.

    So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:

    In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.

    Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

    In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

    To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

    As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.


    EXONERATED

    Fuck off

    You’re a good typer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    Interesting. After a few years of investigation, Hillary wasn't charged with a crime. Sound familiar?
    Yes. What’s your point? So you agree whining 2 1/2 years later after suggesting not accepting the results of the election was a threat to the nation is embarrassing. Got it.
    Agreed, is embarrassing Hillary is still whining about losing. And it's more embarrassing you people are still whining about Hillary and Obama.
    Yes, mocking Hillary who was whining to Time just this week is “whining”. Only in the mind of a butt hurt leftist.

    Trump is a piece of shit. But mocking the hypocrisy is worth it.

    I love me some schadenfreude
    Hillary lost.. Get over it.
    Your girl should stop whining on the talk show circuit and I’ll quit laughing at your dumb ass.

    You seem embarrassed
    Don’t make those kind of promises
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,333
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    B
    E
    N
    G
    A
    Y
    Z
    I
    !
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    BennyBeaver said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    for all the things that Hillary should be in prison for, and she's saying Trump gets special treatment. Absolutely amazing.

    B
    E
    N
    G
    A
    Y
    Z
    I
    !
    Have the lambs stopped crying, Golve?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.