Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I knew the election was rigged...
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern
I just didn’t think it would be Hillary bitching about it 2 1/2 years later.
http://time.com/5574159/hillary-clinton-edward-felsenthal-time-100-summit/
Imagine not accepting the results of a presidential election.
http://time.com/5574159/hillary-clinton-edward-felsenthal-time-100-summit/
Imagine not accepting the results of a presidential election.
Comments
That would be the same Obama who was in charge when Russia bought those Facebook ads
Hilary said Trump should have been indicted
Ironic
El oh el. These fucks.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/18/trump-rigged-election-obama-warning-america-divided
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Trump is a piece of shit. But mocking the hypocrisy is worth it.
I love me some schadenfreude
You seem embarrassed
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
EXONERATED
Fuck off
E
N
G
A
Y
Z
I
!