So the NY Times has concluded that the Steele dossier was most likely Russian disinformation

SFGbob

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

[Agents did not believe that either the source or Mr. Steele was deliberately inventing things, according to the former official. How the dossier ended up loaded with dubious or exaggerated details remains uncertain, but the document may be the result of a high-stakes game of telephone, in which rumors and hearsay were passed from source to source.

Another possibility — one that Mr. Steele has not ruled out — could be Russian disinformation. That would mean that in addition to carrying out an effective attack on the Clinton campaign, Russian spymasters hedged their bets and placed a few land mines under Mr. Trump’s presidency as well.

Oleg D. Kalugin, a former K.G.B. general who now lives outside Washington, saw that as plausible. “Russia has huge experience in spreading false information,” he said.]

Good thing the dossier wasn't used to get a wire tapping on Carter page or open an investigation into Trump.

Fucking liar

Just doing what pathological liars do.