Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So the NY Times has concluded that the Steele dossier was most likely Russian disinformation
Which means that Hillary and the DNC funded a Russian disinformation campaign by the Russians to impact the election. And that Harry Reid and John McCain and the Obama Administration used this Russian disinformation in order to smear Trump and launch an investigation into the Trump campaign.
And Trump colluded with the Russians?
4 ·
Comments
Btw, CD is your head still so far up your ass that you're still claiming none of this really happened and it's all a right-wing, tin foil hat conspiracy theory?
Because it was just a few months ago that was your position on the Trump campaign being spied upon.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html
And here is the article you got the information from:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/46240/nyt-finally-acknowledges-steele-dossier-might-not-ashe-schow
Or this one:
https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2019/04/nyt-finally-acknowledges-steele-dossier-might-not-factual/
Another possibility — one that Mr. Steele has not ruled out — could be Russian disinformation. That would mean that in addition to carrying out an effective attack on the Clinton campaign, Russian spymasters hedged their bets and placed a few land mines under Mr. Trump’s presidency as well.
Oleg D. Kalugin, a former K.G.B. general who now lives outside Washington, saw that as plausible. “Russia has huge experience in spreading false information,” he said.]
Hillary was not the origin of the Steele dossier.