I've always liked Cowherd but he constantly throws shit out there and hopes it goes over peoples' heads. Sark inherited quite a few NFL players and he knows that. But that doesn't fit his argument.
Though the more I think about it, Sark will probably succeed at SC. He will have a shit ton of 5stars to play with which will certainly hide his deficiencies as a coach.
That was my point to my Troojan brah. Talent will hide his difficencies, but soft lines, special team errors, lack of discipline will keep popping up costing them games.
Sark will never win a championshop at USC, maybe 1 or 2 rose bowls, but I think Mora as long as he's at UCLA will be winning more south championships than Sark. Also if Graham is at ASU he'll win a few. USC under carroll was never challenged by UCLA, and sark isn't half the coach carroll is. If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark will never win a championshop at USC, maybe 1 or 2 rose bowls, but I think Mora as long as he's at UCLA will be winning more south championships than Sark. Also if Graham is at ASU he'll win a few. USC under carroll was never challenged by UCLA, and sark isn't half the coach carroll is. If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark wins 0 South championships coaching against Mora and Graham.
Sark will never win a championshop at USC, maybe 1 or 2 rose bowls, but I think Mora as long as he's at UCLA will be winning more south championships than Sark. Also if Graham is at ASU he'll win a few. USC under carroll was never challenged by UCLA, and sark isn't half the coach carroll is. If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark wins 0 South championships coaching against Mora and Graham.
one or two years the talent discrepancy will be too large. The team will win in spite of sark
Sark will never win a championshop at USC, maybe 1 or 2 rose bowls, but I think Mora as long as he's at UCLA will be winning more south championships than Sark. Also if Graham is at ASU he'll win a few. USC under carroll was never challenged by UCLA, and sark isn't half the coach carroll is. If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark wins 0 South championships coaching against Mora and Graham.
one or two years the talent discrepancy will be too large. The team will win in spite of sark
That was my point to my Troojan brah. Talent will hide his difficencies, but soft lines, special team errors, lack of discipline will keep popping up costing them games.
Exactly. If you're mediocre at UW you'll be good at USC, but never great.
I've always liked Cowherd but he constantly throws shit out there and hopes it goes over peoples' heads. Sark inherited quite a few NFL players and he knows that. But that doesn't fit his argument.
Though the more I think about it, Sark will probably succeed at SC. He will have a shit ton of 5stars to play with which will certainly hide his deficiencies as a coach.
He will get 9/10 wins a year ... he will be out coached at least once a year, and penalties and dip shit play calling will cost him another.
I doubt he will make a Rose Bowl, but he will pown the Holiday and Alamo
Sark will never win a championshop at USC, maybe 1 or 2 rose bowls, but I think Mora as long as he's at UCLA will be winning more south championships than Sark. Also if Graham is at ASU he'll win a few. USC under carroll was never challenged by UCLA, and sark isn't half the coach carroll is. If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark wins 0 South championships coaching against Mora and Graham.
I've always liked Cowherd but he constantly throws shit out there and hopes it goes over peoples' heads. Sark inherited quite a few NFL players and he knows that. But that doesn't fit his argument.
Though the more I think about it, Sark will probably succeed at SC. He will have a shit ton of 5stars to play with which will certainly hide his deficiencies as a coach.
He will get 9/10 wins a year ... he will be out coached at least once a year, and penalties and dip shit play calling will cost him another.
I doubt he will make a Rose Bowl, but he will pown the Holiday and Alamo
he'll be good, never great. He'll luck into one rose bowl, nothing more
Comments
Though the more I think about it, Sark will probably succeed at SC. He will have a shit ton of 5stars to play with which will certainly hide his deficiencies as a coach.
If he's there 5 years he'll win 1, maybe 2 at best
Sark will be 9-3 at best..and fired after a 7-5
I doubt he will make a Rose Bowl, but he will pown the Holiday and Alamo
#HOPE
I loved that Neil Everett on Sportscenter pointed out that Sarkisian went only 5-4 in conference four years in a row.