Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

One percent puppet heard from

«134

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club

    Why can’t we blame entitlements, the GOP, and Dems?

    We can. Both parties have fucked us equally fiscally. But the electorate likes generous benefits and tax cuts. You can’t have both.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Obamacare #clockworkshill heard from #rightontim.

    Make no mistake who butters his hamburger buns - the medical mafia and big pharma.


    Kill yourself #lapdog.
    You sound bitter this morning. Does it upset that that it's not only Democrats that fuck up the deficit? That both parties do it?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    Damoan hates context. Doesn't realize how embarrassing it is to say federal revenues are at an all time high and can't have an effect on the deficit.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,461 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Obamacare #clockworkshill heard from #rightontim.

    Make no mistake who butters his hamburger buns - the medical mafia and big pharma.


    Kill yourself #lapdog.
    You sound bitter this morning. Does it upset that that it's not only Democrats that fuck up the deficit? That both parties do it?
    You represent everything that is wrong with America. Kill yourself.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited April 2019

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Hi there! What's the definition of entitlement? Maybe Bob can explain it for you.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Yes and no. I'd be curious to see the data on what the average SS recipient paid in to the system vs what they received in benefits. Guess some of it has to do with how long you live.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    edited April 2019

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    Damoan hates context. Doesn't realize how embarrassing it is to say federal revenues are at an all time high and can't have an effect on the deficit.
    It’s embarrassing to think that government revenue is a problem. It’s not.
    Trying to explain to a liberal that the issue isn't the stupid high amounts of tax the government takes in, but instead is the governments overwhelming desire ans ability to outspend all the trillions it takes is like putting toothpaste back in the tube.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,090 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
    So, here's the thing, I'm against government largess for reasons of efficiency, free markets, blah blah blah and I think anyone who has spent time in the tug knows I'm no tax and spend liberal

    buuuuuuutttt we've essentially convinced the rest of the world to use our currency as the world reserve currency(for historical reasons we are probably the only meaningful country to never default on its debt, thank you George Washington). That means that we are effectively able to finance our debt at negative rates while the rest of the world gets a safe haven for their stored value.

    This is like boosters offering recruits loans at negative interest rates, we can use it to buy a new camaro, a sound system, strip clubs, etc. or we could also use it to pay our tuition, buy a house, or start a business.

    Sure, we can spend the excess cash on entitlements to short-term boost the consumption of a select group of citizens, or we can invest the money in areas the government is actually an effective agent at growing long term productivity(R&D for example), which will further spur GDP growth which will ultimately reduce our debt to income ratio as well.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Yes and no. I'd be curious to see the data on what the average SS recipient paid in to the system vs what they received in benefits. Guess some of it has to do with how long you live.
    The money you pay in is not actually put in the Al Gore lock box where it can compound for 40 years like your private account. So the answer is if you live you'll get more than you pay, It was based on people dying

    Mitch is still a worthless piece of shit though. Bears repeating
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,090 Founders Club
    We could further, also be using these funds to help spread democracy and development of our allies across the world(which we do but extremely stupidly I might add) while still reaping a profit. Loans at favorable interest rates that are still above our effective interest rate to develop infrastructure with countries we want favorable relations with while collecting a profit.

    This is part of what China has sneakily done with development loans(that we fund), take a loan out at a low rate meant for "development", then turn around and give some place like Sri Lanka a loan at an even higher rate, and collect the profit while also gaining influence.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
    So, here's the thing, I'm against government largess for reasons of efficiency, free markets, blah blah blah and I think anyone who has spent time in the tug knows I'm no tax and spend liberal

    buuuuuuutttt we've essentially convinced the rest of the world to use our currency as the world reserve currency(for historical reasons we are probably the only meaningful country to never default on its debt, thank you George Washington). That means that we are effectively able to finance our debt at negative rates while the rest of the world gets a safe haven for their stored value.

    This is like boosters offering recruits loans at negative interest rates, we can use it to buy a new camaro, a sound system, strip clubs, etc. or we could also use it to pay our tuition, buy a house, or start a business.

    Sure, we can spend the excess cash on entitlements to short-term boost the consumption of a select group of citizens, or we can invest the money in areas the government is actually an effective agent at growing long term productivity(R&D for example), which will further spur GDP growth which will ultimately reduce our debt to income ratio as well.
    Imagine understanding this.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    Damoan hates context. Doesn't realize how embarrassing it is to say federal revenues are at an all time high and can't have an effect on the deficit.
    It’s embarrassing to think that government revenue is a problem. It’s not.
    Trying to explain to a liberal that the issue isn't the stupid high amounts of tax the government takes in, but instead is the governments overwhelming desire ans ability to outspend all the trillions it takes is like putting toothpaste back in the tube.
    That's not really the question tho. Most of our government spending is social security, Medicare and the military. The amounts that conservatives rail on that they want cut, food stamps for example, are miniscule in relation to the government as a whole. That's why conservatives don't actually ever cut spending even tho they campaign on it.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,090 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
    So, here's the thing, I'm against government largess for reasons of efficiency, free markets, blah blah blah and I think anyone who has spent time in the tug knows I'm no tax and spend liberal

    buuuuuuutttt we've essentially convinced the rest of the world to use our currency as the world reserve currency(for historical reasons we are probably the only meaningful country to never default on its debt, thank you George Washington). That means that we are effectively able to finance our debt at negative rates while the rest of the world gets a safe haven for their stored value.

    This is like boosters offering recruits loans at negative interest rates, we can use it to buy a new camaro, a sound system, strip clubs, etc. or we could also use it to pay our tuition, buy a house, or start a business.

    Sure, we can spend the excess cash on entitlements to short-term boost the consumption of a select group of citizens, or we can invest the money in areas the government is actually an effective agent at growing long term productivity(R&D for example), which will further spur GDP growth which will ultimately reduce our debt to income ratio as well.
    Imagine understanding this.
    Trump's plan to cut taxes, invest in infrastructure, and go full Reagonomics isn't as batshit as people like to make it out to be.

    Investments can also be rolled back if the economy changes, entitlements can never be.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
    So, here's the thing, I'm against government largess for reasons of efficiency, free markets, blah blah blah and I think anyone who has spent time in the tug knows I'm no tax and spend liberal

    buuuuuuutttt we've essentially convinced the rest of the world to use our currency as the world reserve currency(for historical reasons we are probably the only meaningful country to never default on its debt, thank you George Washington). That means that we are effectively able to finance our debt at negative rates while the rest of the world gets a safe haven for their stored value.

    This is like boosters offering recruits loans at negative interest rates, we can use it to buy a new camaro, a sound system, strip clubs, etc. or we could also use it to pay our tuition, buy a house, or start a business.

    Sure, we can spend the excess cash on entitlements to short-term boost the consumption of a select group of citizens, or we can invest the money in areas the government is actually an effective agent at growing long term productivity(R&D for example), which will further spur GDP growth which will ultimately reduce our debt to income ratio as well.
    Yes, I'm well aware of all of the above. But I am concerned that it can't go on forever my fren. What happens when debt hits 200% of GDP and the foreigners want more interest to buy our? t-bills? To date, we've been able to service our massive debt on the cheap, but if the interest we have to pay starts to increase dramatically the slice of the pie going simply to debt service is going to get ugly.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Feel the cost cutting:

    Medicare Spending was $502 Billion in 2008 in 2017 it was $702 Billion. Medicaid Spending was $374 Billion in 2008 in 2016 it was $553 Billion. Feel the cost cutting.


    This is like when Hondo blow Obama for his "fiscal austerity" because he reduced multi trillion dollar deficit spending to spending that was only $600 billion in deficit spending.

    The fact that Obama jacked it up to over a trillion dollars a year in the first place is never mentioned
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Feel the cost cutting:

    Medicare Spending was $502 Billion in 2008 in 2017 it was $702 Billion. Medicaid Spending was $374 Billion in 2008 in 2016 it was $553 Billion. Feel the cost cutting.


    This is like when Hondo blow Obama for his "fiscal austerity" because he reduced multi trillion dollar deficit spending to spending that was only $600 billion in deficit spending.

    The fact that Obama jacked it up to over a trillion dollars a year in the first place is never mentioned
    Again Bob hates context. What is the cost per participant? Dontcha think there was a few more people on the program in 2017? Not to mention inflation.

    You seriously are an idiot.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Social Security along with Medicare are entitlements. It's a misunderstanding of the word that makes you think they are not entitlements.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,090 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    You've oft stated Damone that #taxationistheft . And to some extend I'd agree with you. But I tell you what - if we keep running these massive deficits - and at this point they are a bi-partisan problem - and the guvmint has to use MMT to inflate the problem away I'm gonna be pretty god damned pissed. #inflationisthefttoo
    So, here's the thing, I'm against government largess for reasons of efficiency, free markets, blah blah blah and I think anyone who has spent time in the tug knows I'm no tax and spend liberal

    buuuuuuutttt we've essentially convinced the rest of the world to use our currency as the world reserve currency(for historical reasons we are probably the only meaningful country to never default on its debt, thank you George Washington). That means that we are effectively able to finance our debt at negative rates while the rest of the world gets a safe haven for their stored value.

    This is like boosters offering recruits loans at negative interest rates, we can use it to buy a new camaro, a sound system, strip clubs, etc. or we could also use it to pay our tuition, buy a house, or start a business.

    Sure, we can spend the excess cash on entitlements to short-term boost the consumption of a select group of citizens, or we can invest the money in areas the government is actually an effective agent at growing long term productivity(R&D for example), which will further spur GDP growth which will ultimately reduce our debt to income ratio as well.
    Yes, I'm well aware of all of the above. But I am concerned that it can't go on forever my fren. What happens when debt hits 200% of GDP and the foreigners want more interest to buy our? t-bills? To date, we've been able to service our massive debt on the cheap, but if the interest we have to pay starts to increase dramatically the slice of the pie going simply to debt service is going to get ugly.
    This is why we should be investing in things that grow production. Think of it like taking out loans for medical school or an MBA. Sure, your short term debt to income ratio will suffer but your long term earnings increase dramatically.

    Paying down the current debt would be much more painful than simply growing our way out of it. Why do you think our current debt to GDP ratio is so much healthier than most of the developed world?

    Also, as I said, that's why entitlements are much more dangerous than investments. You can fairly easily quit further capital investments. Ending entitlements produces riots.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    We're too big to fail
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    Federal revenue is at an all time high... But yeah, tax cuts!
    Damoan hates context. Doesn't realize how embarrassing it is to say federal revenues are at an all time high and can't have an effect on the deficit.
    It’s embarrassing to think that government revenue is a problem. It’s not.
    How does it track with inflation/costs? Honest question.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,268 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Yes and no. I'd be curious to see the data on what the average SS recipient paid in to the system vs what they received in benefits. Guess some of it has to do with how long you live.
    The money you pay in is not actually put in the Al Gore lock box where it can compound for 40 years like your private account. So the answer is if you live you'll get more than you pay, It was based on people dying

    Mitch is still a worthless piece of shit though. Bears repeating
    Instead of taxing cigarettes we should give them away like the army used to
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    2001400ex said:

    He is partially right. Medicare and Medicaid had cost cutting moves under Obamacare. Social security needs to be tackled now. But all three are increasing drastically because of baby boomers.

    He does leave out the moves the last two years that have hurt the deficit. Being the tax cuts, increase in military spending, repealing the individual mandate.

    People like to call Social Security an entitlement. SSI is, but standard Social Security is paid for through years of payments. It’s their fucking money, and they should get it.
    Yes and no. I'd be curious to see the data on what the average SS recipient paid in to the system vs what they received in benefits. Guess some of it has to do with how long you live.
    Healthy lower to middle income earners who live into their 80s will see a positive ROI from Social Security. High income earners, especially if you only live into your mid-70s, will see a negative ROI from Social Security.