Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Clinton Gutted Welfare

«1

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2019
    Notice as well that welfare spending actually grew at a faster pace after welfare reform was passed.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Budget equals actual spending now. Chinteresting.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Budget equals actual spending now. Chinteresting.

    If you’re claiming they spent less than what was budgeted let’s see your link, if not shut your pathological lying twat of a mouth.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    The claim was that Welfare was “gutted”. That’s the dick you jumped into suck Hondo
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937


    You can finally let this go now, moron
  • HardlyClothed
    HardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    I don’t even understand what Bob is trying to prove by continuing to fuck this chicken? It’s universally agreed that ‘96 welfare reform “gutted” the program. I guess it’s too difficult to admit you showed your ass. It’s a message board, you were wrong. Just move on.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    I don’t know about welfare, but I do know the Special Olympics just got canceled.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I don’t even understand what Bob is trying to prove by continuing to fuck this chicken? It’s universally agreed that ‘96 welfare reform “gutted” the program. I guess it’s too difficult to admit you showed your ass. It’s a message board, you were wrong. Just move on.

    Because there is only one form of welfare. There isn’t housing welfare, this isn’t childcare welfare there isn’t food stamps and there isn’t Medicaid, there only direct cash benefits given to welfare recipients that counts as welfare.

    And you'll notice how his chart doesn't actually say that money to TANF and AFDC was cut, only that number of people receiving those benefits was reduced. And when you're a liberal that's the biggest tragedy; Someone actually gets off of welfare. So despite the fact that welfare spending on other programs was increased. Despite the fact that the child tax credit was increased, despite the fact that the earned income tax credit was increased. Welfare was "gutted" because fewer people were receiving one form of welfare.

    Why would I let it go? You talked straight out of your ass and now "welfare" is reduced to just one single government program.
  • MariotaTheGawd
    MariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    I love that liberals are lying pieces of shit and claim that a spending increase of $25B is a “gutting” of a program.

    It’s one of the reasons why we can’t even slow spending let alone cut it.

    I already know all about the “changes” dumbfuck. It’s why I know the claim that Clinton “gutted” welfare is a fucking lie.

    I’m guessing you’re going to run and hide like a Kunt now or respond back with more vacuousness.
  • MariotaTheGawd
    MariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441

    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.

    Calm down turbo. Imagine caring about this.
    Has there ever been a more influential poster on this board than me? My one liners are so good that you lemmings repeat them for months
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.

    Calm down turbo. Imagine caring about this.
    Has there ever been a more influential poster on this board than me? My one liners are so good that you lemmings repeat them for months
    Called it
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.

    Calm down turbo. Imagine caring about this.
    Has there ever been a more influential poster on this board than me? My one liners are so good that you lemmings repeat them for months
    Only two lemmings in this thread. Look around.

    Or, keep assuming we should all follow the lead of Harv's rusty cheesegrater....leading the tolerant Left.

    At least APAG and Benny bring something to the table...

  • MariotaTheGawd
    MariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    MisterEm said:

    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.

    Calm down turbo. Imagine caring about this.
    Has there ever been a more influential poster on this board than me? My one liners are so good that you lemmings repeat them for months
    Only two lemmings in this thread. Look around.

    Or, keep assuming we should all follow the lead of Harv's rusty cheesegrater....leading the tolerant Left.

    At least APAG and Benny bring something to the table...

    am i supposed to know/care who harv, apag, and benny are?
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,343 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    I don’t even understand what Bob is trying to prove by continuing to fuck this chicken? It’s universally agreed that ‘96 welfare reform “gutted” the program. I guess it’s too difficult to admit you showed your ass. It’s a message board, you were wrong. Just move on.

    Because there is only one form of welfare. There isn’t housing welfare, this isn’t childcare welfare there isn’t food stamps and there isn’t Medicaid, there only direct cash benefits given to welfare recipients that counts as welfare.

    And you'll notice how his chart doesn't actually say that money to TANF and AFDC was cut, only that number of people receiving those benefits was reduced. And when you're a liberal that's the biggest tragedy; Someone actually gets off of welfare. So despite the fact that welfare spending on other programs was increased. Despite the fact that the child tax credit was increased, despite the fact that the earned income tax credit was increased. Welfare was "gutted" because fewer people were receiving one form of welfare.

    Why would I let it go? You talked straight out of your ass and now "welfare" is reduced to just one single government program.
    Hence, why transfer payments is a much better term.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989



    You can finally let this go now, moron

    You can't counter a point about the budget with a graph that has no data about it. Try again.
  • MariotaTheGawd
    MariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441



    You can finally let this go now, moron

    You can't counter a point about the budget with a graph that has no data about it. Try again.
    This is a joke right
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,908 Standard Supporter
    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    I'm all about that free health insurance last year.
    No income ftw
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,343 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
    Now are you going to follow sledog around the board and call him a pathological liar and post his 7 or 8 generations quote on every thread?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
    Now are you going to follow sledog around the board and call him a pathological liar and post his 7 or 8 generations quote on every thread?
    A simple mistake doesn't make someone a pathological liar Hondo. Claiming:

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.

    and then posting 3 links and claiming they support this lie, when the did no such thing, and still nearly a week later saying your initial statement was accurate is what gets you called a pathological liar. I'm certain that when confronted with the information that he misspoke Sledog will have no problem correcting himself.

    It's only pathological liars like yourself who are incapable of doing such a thing Hondo.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
    Now are you going to follow sledog around the board and call him a pathological liar and post his 7 or 8 generations quote on every thread?
    A simple mistake doesn't make someone a pathological liar Hondo. Claiming:

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.

    and then posting 3 links and claiming they support this lie, when the did no such thing, and still nearly a week later saying your initial statement was accurate is what gets you called a pathological liar. I'm certain that when confronted with the information that he misspoke Sledog will have no problem correcting himself.

    It's only pathological liars like yourself who are incapable of doing such a thing Hondo.
    Oh so a simple mistake like no social security in the 50s (there was it was just like 1.25% or something). Funny how when I make a mistake, I'm a liar. But when your comrade makes a mistake. Eh, it's just a mistake.

    Partisan shill.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
    Now are you going to follow sledog around the board and call him a pathological liar and post his 7 or 8 generations quote on every thread?
    A simple mistake doesn't make someone a pathological liar Hondo. Claiming:

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.

    and then posting 3 links and claiming they support this lie, when the did no such thing, and still nearly a week later saying your initial statement was accurate is what gets you called a pathological liar. I'm certain that when confronted with the information that he misspoke Sledog will have no problem correcting himself.

    It's only pathological liars like yourself who are incapable of doing such a thing Hondo.
    Oh so a simple mistake like no social security in the 50s (there was it was just like 1.25% or something). Funny how when I make a mistake, I'm a liar. But when your comrade makes a mistake. Eh, it's just a mistake.

    Partisan shill.
    Claiming that Social Security didn't exist back in the 1950s doesn't make you a pathological liar Hondo, it just outs you as an ignorant dipshit. What made you a pathological liar was when you claimed you were "technically correct" that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s.

    You make "mistakes" all the fucking time Hondo. That's on account of you being a poorly read dumbfuck who likes to run your mouth. That's doesn't make you a pathological liar.

    Claiming this statement is accurate, and that you posted 3 links that support it, and repeating that lie for over a week when everyone here know you're lying, is what gets you called correctly, a pathological liar.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,343 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    Generation is usual considered anywhere from 20 to 25 years. 7 generations ago would either be 140 years ago or 175 years ago but your point is taken, there was no welfare back then.
    The fast strategy pours get knocked up earlier so I was going with 17 years a pop.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,698 Standard Supporter

    I love that people like bob are so aggressive in their stupidity. He latches onto a claim like "welfare was gutted by clinton" and goes on a public mission to disprove that specific phrase instead of just shutting the fuck up and learning more about the 1996 changes. I'm guessing he got this talking point from whichever raving lunatic he listens to on his am radio and now he has an anger boner about proving the 3 people who disagree with him on this shitty message board wrong.

    Calm down turbo. Imagine caring about this.
    Has there ever been a more influential poster on this board than me? My one liners are so good that you lemmings repeat them for months
    You're a dumb faggot Duck who's obsessed with the Huskies. One of thousands
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,908 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    When your having kids at 14 or 15 it's faster. I should have said 4.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2019
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Since when is welfare "temporary"? Some heave been on it for 7 or 8 generations. That's hardly temporary.

    7 generations ago is 120 years or 1909. Not much welfare back then.
    When your having kids at 14 or 15 it's faster. I should have said 4.
    See Hondo, and this is why Sled just made a simple mistake, and why you're a pathological liar.