"Additionally, it is hard to discount a 'Trump effect' when a considerable number of these reported hate crimes reference Trump," they continued. "According to the ADL's 2016 data, these incidents included vandalism, intimidation and assault."
Scenario A: Trump supporters are committing hate crimes and yelling “This is for Trump (or words to that effect)”, or;
Scenario B: Trump supporters are being attacked because they are Trump supporters.
Both scenarios meet the criteria of the above quote (from the article) and I’ve seen significantly more evidence of the latter.
Fake crimes and fake news go hand in hand. Seems the most popular hate crime I hear about on the news is people wearing MAGA hats being assaulted. Do we have a study on those hate crimes?
Reported? Or charged and convicted?And what’s the time frame of these hate crimes? Like the night of the rallies? Forgive me, for only reading the headline.
The fact that there isn't any details or specifics on any of these "hate" crimes is a huge red flag.
Given the huge number of phony hate crimes that we know were reported after Trump's election there is no reason why this study should be believed.
Almost 400 hate crime hoaxes as of today, and continuing to pile up.
As you can see from APAG's foolish comment about "fine people," he's drunk on CNN's Hoax Kool-Aid. Trump never said Nazis were "fine people." In fact, he condemned them at the very press conference where this "fine people" hoax originated.
But most people are lazy ignorant sheep, like APAG, who take CNN at their word.
Massively expand the definition of what a "hate crime" is, and voila, more hate crimes.
The well-deserved self-destruction of the scam organization SPLC, propagator in chief of hate crime hoaxes and falsified hate crime statistics, is a thing of beauty. When a once good organization becomes a corrupt, money laundering joke, it's a good day in the USA when they collapse inward.
Comments
Given the huge number of phony hate crimes that we know were reported after Trump's election there is no reason why this study should be believed.
Scenario A: Trump supporters are committing hate crimes and yelling “This is for Trump (or words to that effect)”, or;
Scenario B: Trump supporters are being attacked because they are Trump supporters.
Both scenarios meet the criteria of the above quote (from the article) and I’ve seen significantly more evidence of the latter.
That said, 1 x 200% = 2
As noted earlier, a lack of specifics is troubling.
TYFYOC
BTW. Who’s the fag in your avatar???
For shame.
https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Jazmine-Barnes-Shaun-King-Twitter-reaction-13514309.php
As you can see from APAG's foolish comment about "fine people," he's drunk on CNN's Hoax Kool-Aid. Trump never said Nazis were "fine people." In fact, he condemned them at the very press conference where this "fine people" hoax originated.
But most people are lazy ignorant sheep, like APAG, who take CNN at their word.
Trump Didn't Call Neo-Nazis 'Fine People.' Here's Proof. And the oft-requested LINK?
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html
It could have happened.
The well-deserved self-destruction of the scam organization SPLC, propagator in chief of hate crime hoaxes and falsified hate crime statistics, is a thing of beauty. When a once good organization becomes a corrupt, money laundering joke, it's a good day in the USA when they collapse inward.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQYJ_Cp91ZY