Democrats sign off on treason
or two years, Democrats and their leadership have been haranguing the people of the United States with hysteria claiming that President Trump was an agent of the Russians, stole the election, is mentally disturbed or unfit and obstructed justice -- among other bizarre and crazed accusations. Yet Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the Democratically-led House, has announced that impeaching Trump is “not worth it.”
In an interview for The Washington Post magazine, conducted on March 6, Mrs. Pelosi said, “I’m not for impeachment. … This is news. I haven’t said this to any press person before. But since you asked, and I’ve been thinking about this, impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”
This new revelation from Mrs. Pelosi is another example of Democrats casually admitting that everything they’ve done to this country through their obscene accusations against the president and his supporters was a sham.
After all, if you believe that the duly elected president of the United States is actually a foreign agent for a nation that has historically been an enemy of this country, you should be shocked at Mrs. Pelosi walking away from the idea of taking action.
Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept made this observation on Twitter: “Anyone who has ever believed Trump is controlled & blackmailed by Putin to the point that Putin makes Trump treasonously sacrifice America’s interests for Russia’s -- and there are a lot of you -- should be marching in fury in the streets over Pelosi’s refusal to impeach Trump.”
We’ve been told every day since the election that she won that election in 2016. That Donald Trump stole that election. That Mr. Trump used the Russians to help him steal it from her. In fact, 2020 would simply be her re-election to her second term.
The answer to this is the same as Mrs. Pelosi’s decisions: The Democratic grass-roots have known all along the accusations against Mr. Trump have been a fraud. The 2016 election was fair. Mrs. Clinton did not lose because it was stolen; she lost because she took people and things for granted, didn’t go to Wisconsin and arrogantly wrote off blue states as guaranteed. In other words, Hillary lost because she was Hillary. And they know it.
The aftermath of then-Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing is another good example of how gaslighting the public is now a Democratic art. We were told for weeks that he was a drug-dealing pimp who organized gang rape parties. And this was just in high school.
Despite his eventual confirmation to the high court, Sens. Kamala D. Harris and Cory Booker, two of those prominently leading Democrats who attempted virtual character assassination, who strutted and preened on television with their furrowed brows during the persecution, aren’t demanding that Justice Kavanaugh be removed; they aren’t out there organizing rallies to protest the horrible man who has been put on the Supreme Court.
Instead, they’re running for president, because the Democrats think that attempting to destroy an innocent man for political gain should get you promoted.
Comments
-
Now you are upset because Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Trump... Make up your mind.
-
Is that what you got from the article?2001400ex said:Now you are upset because Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Trump... Make up your mind.
-
That topic makes up 5 out of the 10 paragraphs you posted. So yes, that's what I got.RaceBannon said:
Is that what you got from the article?2001400ex said:Now you are upset because Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Trump... Make up your mind.
-
So you're stupid2001400ex said:
That topic makes up 5 out of the 10 paragraphs you posted. So yes, that's what I got.RaceBannon said:
Is that what you got from the article?2001400ex said:Now you are upset because Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Trump... Make up your mind.
Water is wet -
Ok Race. What is the point of the conversation? In your words.RaceBannon said:
So you're stupid2001400ex said:
That topic makes up 5 out of the 10 paragraphs you posted. So yes, that's what I got.RaceBannon said:
Is that what you got from the article?2001400ex said:Now you are upset because Pelosi doesn't want to impeach Trump... Make up your mind.
Water is wet -
The point is your parties lie has died.
Fuck off! -
Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
We saw the Rats support taking out a Supreme Court nominee based upon lies and suspending due process. What they did to Trump is just more of the same.WestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party
-
Even worse. A sitting president used our intelligence and law enforcement agencies to try and thwart the election of the opposing party candidate and then to attempt to unseat the new sitting president.SFGbob said:
We saw the Rats support taking out a Supreme Court nominee based upon lies and suspending due process. What they did to Trump is just more of the same.WestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party -
Shut the fuck up moron2001400ex said:
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party -
Wait, you said this:RaceBannon said:
Shut the fuck up moron2001400ex said:
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
So what were the crimes she accused Trump of Race? Or did you mean something else? Please to be explaining. -
Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion.
-
If you can't see that was photoshopped, then i can't help youRaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
I discussed the election. Was I trying to influence the election? How did their discussion influence the election?2001400ex said:
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
So Russian collusion to steal the election isn't a crime2001400ex said:
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion.
Why have we had Mueller for two years?
Why do you insist on doubling down on being a fucking moron?
I googled it and found these at the top. If you're contention is that Pelosi never said Trump was guilty then you're a fucking liar as usual -
All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
-
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same -
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same -
It's why for two years the democrats have also attacked the GOP and Trump voters for not abandoning him. They are smart enough to learn from the GOP who won the battle against Bubba with an impeachment but lost the war because the democrats stood firm. No conviction and a 1998 beat down in the election for the GOPHHusky said:
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
It took Goldwater and other GOP to get Nixon to resign
Everything was all in on Mueller to ice the cake and get rid of Trump.
Instead the overwhelming evidence is that the FBI and the DOJ threw the Hillary case and that the collusion theory was made of whole cloth base on a fake dossier developed by the DNC
Not a good look for your team there H -
It's amazing what looks "overwhelming" to you. And also, what doesn't.RaceBannon said:
It's why for two years the democrats have also attacked the GOP and Trump voters for not abandoning him. They are smart enough to learn from the GOP who won the battle against Bubba with an impeachment but lost the war because the democrats stood firm. No conviction and a 1998 beat down in the election for the GOPHHusky said:
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
It took Goldwater and other GOP to get Nixon to resign
Everything was all in on Mueller to ice the cake and get rid of Trump.
Instead the overwhelming evidence is that the FBI and the DOJ threw the Hillary case and that the collusion theory was made of whole cloth base on a fake dossier developed by the DNC
Not a good look for your team there H
-
Not really. Just follow the story. Or stories with an open mindHHusky said:
It's amazing what looks "overwhelming" to you. And also, what doesn't.RaceBannon said:
It's why for two years the democrats have also attacked the GOP and Trump voters for not abandoning him. They are smart enough to learn from the GOP who won the battle against Bubba with an impeachment but lost the war because the democrats stood firm. No conviction and a 1998 beat down in the election for the GOPHHusky said:
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
It took Goldwater and other GOP to get Nixon to resign
Everything was all in on Mueller to ice the cake and get rid of Trump.
Instead the overwhelming evidence is that the FBI and the DOJ threw the Hillary case and that the collusion theory was made of whole cloth base on a fake dossier developed by the DNC
Not a good look for your team there H -
I prefer not to have a mind so open that the wind whistles when it blows through.RaceBannon said:
Not really. Just follow the story. Or stories with an open mindHHusky said:
It's amazing what looks "overwhelming" to you. And also, what doesn't.RaceBannon said:
It's why for two years the democrats have also attacked the GOP and Trump voters for not abandoning him. They are smart enough to learn from the GOP who won the battle against Bubba with an impeachment but lost the war because the democrats stood firm. No conviction and a 1998 beat down in the election for the GOPHHusky said:
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
It took Goldwater and other GOP to get Nixon to resign
Everything was all in on Mueller to ice the cake and get rid of Trump.
Instead the overwhelming evidence is that the FBI and the DOJ threw the Hillary case and that the collusion theory was made of whole cloth base on a fake dossier developed by the DNC
Not a good look for your team there H -
We certainly can't see any evidence of that claim.HHusky said:
I prefer not to have a mind so open that the wind whistles when it blows through.RaceBannon said:
Not really. Just follow the story. Or stories with an open mindHHusky said:
It's amazing what looks "overwhelming" to you. And also, what doesn't.RaceBannon said:
It's why for two years the democrats have also attacked the GOP and Trump voters for not abandoning him. They are smart enough to learn from the GOP who won the battle against Bubba with an impeachment but lost the war because the democrats stood firm. No conviction and a 1998 beat down in the election for the GOPHHusky said:
He may not be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . . . yet. Although that's not what's required for impeachment, in this environment it's probably what's required in order for the Senate to have the balls to convict.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
It took Goldwater and other GOP to get Nixon to resign
Everything was all in on Mueller to ice the cake and get rid of Trump.
Instead the overwhelming evidence is that the FBI and the DOJ threw the Hillary case and that the collusion theory was made of whole cloth base on a fake dossier developed by the DNC
Not a good look for your team there H -
-
Trump and his cult sure sound angry and frustrated in defending a person they insist is innocent. If mueller, Schiff and SDNY have nothing why is there so much angry backlash? It makes no sense.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same -
AgreeGrundleStiltzkin said:
We didn't spend two years to have this swept under the rug
Both parties have a lot to lose here although I doubt the GOP would cry too many tears over losing Trump -
Because the whole thing is fake.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump and his cult sure sound angry and frustrated in defending a person they insist is innocent. If mueller, Schiff and SDNY have nothing why is there so much angry backlash? It makes no sense.RaceBannon said:
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
Hillary is guilty but Obama instructed them not to prosecute or investigate further. Odd you don't find this strange but them it's you.
