It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly over the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
What qualifies as "wealthy" and what qualifies as "middle class?" Where is that line drawn? Btw, how am I hurt by rich people making more money?
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.
We in the media have a problem. Actually, it's a big problem for all of us. We have become addicted to the notion that, except for the top 1% or the top 10%, the incomes of most Americans have stagnated for decades. The problem is that, at best, this is an exaggeration and, at worst, an untruth.
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.
Comments
Envy the new democratic socialist party of communism slogan.
You heard it from Hondo first.
https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/income-stagnation-myth-robert-samuelson/