Rub and Tug. I bet Hondo will disagee.

MikeDamone

https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/25/florida-massage-parlor-sex-stings

PurpleJ

Adolf Goodell is just out to get the Patriots. FTG.

RaceBannon

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

MikeDamone

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

Just like “the Leauge” in Seattle. Big news. No human trafficking charges.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

My point is that it’s bullshit. 6 month investigation and no trafficking evidence? They get grants to go after “human trafficking”, arrest a bunch of people, have press conferences and grandstand about human trafficking, and charge no one for human trafficking, but just a bunch of misdemeanors that are basically tickets.

My other point is you’d take they side of the state. And I was right.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

My point is that it’s bullshit. 6 month investigation and no trafficking evidence? They get grants to go after “human trafficking”, arrest a bunch of people, have press conferences and grandstand about human trafficking, and charge no one for human trafficking, but just a bunch of misdemeanors that are basically tickets.

My other point is you’d take they side of the state. And I was right.

Where did I take any side?

I said you'd be a fucktard and take the side of conspiracy without all the facts cause your read an article in the internet.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

My point is that it’s bullshit. 6 month investigation and no trafficking evidence? They get grants to go after “human trafficking”, arrest a bunch of people, have press conferences and grandstand about human trafficking, and charge no one for human trafficking, but just a bunch of misdemeanors that are basically tickets.

My other point is you’d take they side of the state. And I was right.

Where did I take any side?

I said you'd be a fucktard and take the side of conspiracy without all the facts cause your read an article in the internet.

“But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. “

They aren’t going after trafficking. They are going after money.

Fact is no charges for trafficking. Huge grants for this.

You believe the cops/state. Enough said on that.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

My point is that it’s bullshit. 6 month investigation and no trafficking evidence? They get grants to go after “human trafficking”, arrest a bunch of people, have press conferences and grandstand about human trafficking, and charge no one for human trafficking, but just a bunch of misdemeanors that are basically tickets.

My other point is you’d take they side of the state. And I was right.

Where did I take any side?

I said you'd be a fucktard and take the side of conspiracy without all the facts cause your read an article in the internet.

“But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. “
Fact is no charges for trafficking. Huge grants for this.

That is a factual comment. Not taking a side. And you added a conspiracy. Nice work!!

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

Six months is a long time, however, and it's hard to reconcile the cops' timeline with their heroic rhetoric. If the women employed at these businesses were really the victims of "modern slavery," why did police take six months to get them out of that situation? Why did it require repeat intimate undercover visits and building misdemeanor prostitution charges against all sorts of random men before these "heroes" decided to intervene

Sex trafficking is real but not all Prostitution is trafficking

If its a consensual business transaction it should be legal.

Harris wants to legalize it along with weed. The democrats are calling me home

It’s all bullshit. If it’s a human trafficking investigation, wouldn’t you expect a human trafficking charge?

First of all, I thought the way the media portrayed this story to start was bullshit. The headlines were misleading and led the reader to think Kraft was the ring leader for sex trafficking.

Secondly, you have to have support to make a charge. It sounds like they are interviewing the ladies there to get that evidence. They have the suspicion but not enough evidence.

I don't see enough to say who is right. But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. It might turn out to be a bullshit claim.

What's your point?

My point is that it’s bullshit. 6 month investigation and no trafficking evidence? They get grants to go after “human trafficking”, arrest a bunch of people, have press conferences and grandstand about human trafficking, and charge no one for human trafficking, but just a bunch of misdemeanors that are basically tickets.

My other point is you’d take they side of the state. And I was right.

Where did I take any side?

I said you'd be a fucktard and take the side of conspiracy without all the facts cause your read an article in the internet.

“But the media that reports that instigators say they are going after sex slavery are correct. Because they are. “
Fact is no charges for trafficking. Huge grants for this.

That is a factual comment. Not taking a side. And you added a conspiracy. Nice work!!

No charges. So where is the conspiracy? Follow the money. It’s all political theatre and bullshit.