Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Grandma didn't have access to Planned Parenthood

1679111214

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,880 Founders Club
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,880 Founders Club
    Contributions plunged from $62,912,331 in 2016 to $26,566,825 in 2017, recently released federal tax filings show.

    Revenue from speeches given by the Clintons also fell from a high of $3.6 million in 2015 to just under $300,000 in 2017. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, the non-profit took in no earnings from speeches, tax filings show.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,880 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,722 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
    Figures never lie. But liars figure.

    How about we look through it like they've looked at Trump?

    Prison for all the Clintons and all their cronies.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yes

    It does

    Race is right as always!!!!
    Use your own words - how much did they take in in 2018 compared to 2012- 2016 annually

    The 2018 audit isn't completed yet.
    2017 was bad enough


    Can't wait for 2018
    So you have any comprehension on why revenues are lower for 2017? Or did your news source just say they are down, clearly they are closing the foundation.

    Your ignorance is showing.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    The Foundation used to be audited by bluechip PwC. Now it's CohnReznick. Probably doesn't mean anything, but probably doesn't mean nothing.


    It's because PWC fucked up their audits. They had to reissue 11, 12, and 13 audits.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Or to show how contributions dried up when she lost

    A very different point. Imagine having a charitable foundation that does charity! Well, Daddy has to imagine it actually.
    If it was charity it wouldn't stop when she had no power

    These are basic concepts
    The money disappeared from that "charity" in about 10 seconds after she lost ans couldn't peddle influence.

    Uranium One paid her 125 million or so via the charity. It was really just a money laundering scheme used to buy influence in Washington. The Clinton's are the facilitators and take a cut. Haiti got .81 Cents.
    This is executive comp. You don't even know what money laundering is. Idiot.

    photo 87709FCA-ABDA-450B-B105-A5B33ABEA44D_zpsncblhycm.png
    Figures never lie. But liars figure.

    How about we look through it like they've looked at Trump?

    Prison for all the Clintons and all their cronies.
    It gets a full audit and it's released on their website. While Trump has never released his tax returns.