Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Cal ranked too high
Comments
-
SHTF and a short little walk later, cirro has you matched.PurpleThrobber said:
So - in your world it's ok for someone to get beat down because of their political beliefs?CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC. A White trash trumptard got his ass beat. Is this really any more complicated than that? It will happen again tomorrow multiple times if that helps you cope.PurpleThrobber said:
Can you not read the legal concept provided?2001400ex said:
So you don't think context like what happened immediately before that matters? It sure mattered in the maga hat kids at the Lincoln memorial. Why is this story different?PurpleThrobber said:
My narrative is a legal basis. Doesn't much fucking matter what happened prior. I suppose if the camera dude pulled out a switchblade and starting menacing lefty, it's possible that was reasonable force. Camera guy must have stashed his weapon prior to the video. For sure. That's what happened.2001400ex said:Funny how we don't see what happened before or after and people are already jumping to conclusions to fit their narrative.
Otherwise, probably gonna be spending some time in the pokey. Civil damages will be interesting too. I'm sure camera guy is going through a tremendous amount of pain and suffering from the trauma.
What about what happened right after?
I have no idea what happened but don't you think there are more scenarios than what you described that could drastically change the opinion of what happened?
And to the fucktards. That's not defending. That's stating what I've said in all these, we need more information before we rush to judgement.
But some of you where this fits their narrative, judge based on a 23 second video.
The difference between the kid at the memorial is there was no battery involved. The assault was committed by Nathan Phillips. The MAGA kid's response was commensurate with the perceived threat. He just stood there and did nothing.
The lefty is going to claim self-defense. But he's still fucked since his response was excessive to the threat offered.
Interesting.
The Throbber isn't too worried about that - he lives at the remote guns and religion compound on high strategic ground. But when the beatdown for political views anarchy shit gets rolling in SoCal and other urban areas - you have a good time with that.
-
Fuck. Might as well live in suburban Moses Lake. Shithole.sarktastic said:
SHTF and a short little walk later, cirro has you matched.PurpleThrobber said:
So - in your world it's ok for someone to get beat down because of their political beliefs?CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC. A White trash trumptard got his ass beat. Is this really any more complicated than that? It will happen again tomorrow multiple times if that helps you cope.PurpleThrobber said:
Can you not read the legal concept provided?2001400ex said:
So you don't think context like what happened immediately before that matters? It sure mattered in the maga hat kids at the Lincoln memorial. Why is this story different?PurpleThrobber said:
My narrative is a legal basis. Doesn't much fucking matter what happened prior. I suppose if the camera dude pulled out a switchblade and starting menacing lefty, it's possible that was reasonable force. Camera guy must have stashed his weapon prior to the video. For sure. That's what happened.2001400ex said:Funny how we don't see what happened before or after and people are already jumping to conclusions to fit their narrative.
Otherwise, probably gonna be spending some time in the pokey. Civil damages will be interesting too. I'm sure camera guy is going through a tremendous amount of pain and suffering from the trauma.
What about what happened right after?
I have no idea what happened but don't you think there are more scenarios than what you described that could drastically change the opinion of what happened?
And to the fucktards. That's not defending. That's stating what I've said in all these, we need more information before we rush to judgement.
But some of you where this fits their narrative, judge based on a 23 second video.
The difference between the kid at the memorial is there was no battery involved. The assault was committed by Nathan Phillips. The MAGA kid's response was commensurate with the perceived threat. He just stood there and did nothing.
The lefty is going to claim self-defense. But he's still fucked since his response was excessive to the threat offered.
Interesting.
The Throbber isn't too worried about that - he lives at the remote guns and religion compound on high strategic ground. But when the beatdown for political views anarchy shit gets rolling in SoCal and other urban areas - you have a good time with that.
-
If this were white kids in MAGA hats who were dishing out the beating would Hondo in a million years call the victims snowflakes?2001400ex said:
And this sounds like a snowflake.Sledog said:www.foxnews.com/us/conservative-activist-assaulted-at-uc-berkeley-campus-during-recruitment-drive
Sure sounds like a lefty.
“College campuses have become increasingly unsafe for conservatives,” Kirk told Fox News. “Our amazing Turning Point USA team was talking and then confronted by the hateful left which resulted in the assault and punching in the face just because of a difference of opinion. If the attacker was wearing a MAGA hat, this would be classified as a hate crime and all over every news channel.”
That being said, I'll withhold judgement until actual facts come out. -
Hondo's still upset conservatives are kicking ANTIFA ass when they show up. He's almost been stomped twice. Likes it better when they can attack old people in numbers. Safer.
-
Alzheimer's AssociationCirrhosisDawg said:
Political beliefs? The bitch got what it deserved. A beat down.PurpleThrobber said:
So - in your world it's ok for someone to get beat down because of their political beliefs?CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC. A White trash trumptard got his ass beat. Is this really any more complicated than that? It will happen again tomorrow multiple times if that helps you cope.PurpleThrobber said:
Can you not read the legal concept provided?2001400ex said:
So you don't think context like what happened immediately before that matters? It sure mattered in the maga hat kids at the Lincoln memorial. Why is this story different?PurpleThrobber said:
My narrative is a legal basis. Doesn't much fucking matter what happened prior. I suppose if the camera dude pulled out a switchblade and starting menacing lefty, it's possible that was reasonable force. Camera guy must have stashed his weapon prior to the video. For sure. That's what happened.2001400ex said:Funny how we don't see what happened before or after and people are already jumping to conclusions to fit their narrative.
Otherwise, probably gonna be spending some time in the pokey. Civil damages will be interesting too. I'm sure camera guy is going through a tremendous amount of pain and suffering from the trauma.
What about what happened right after?
I have no idea what happened but don't you think there are more scenarios than what you described that could drastically change the opinion of what happened?
And to the fucktards. That's not defending. That's stating what I've said in all these, we need more information before we rush to judgement.
But some of you where this fits their narrative, judge based on a 23 second video.
The difference between the kid at the memorial is there was no battery involved. The assault was committed by Nathan Phillips. The MAGA kid's response was commensurate with the perceived threat. He just stood there and did nothing.
The lefty is going to claim self-defense. But he's still fucked since his response was excessive to the threat offered.
Interesting.
The Throbber isn't too worried about that - he lives at the remote guns and religion compound on high strategic ground. But when the beatdown for political views anarchy shit gets rolling in SoCal and other urban areas - you have a good time with that.
Maybe the trumpanzee will act differently next time since it can’t fight or debate to save its life (fuck that fool got clocked).
The trumpanzee will lose badly in court as well.
Enjoy your strategic compound! The real world in so cal is very nice. Your fear and anxiety is noted.
-Aggressive behaviors may be verbal or physical. They can occur suddenly, with no apparent reason, or result from a frustrating situation. While aggression can be hard to cope with, understanding that the person with Alzheimer's or dementia is not acting this way on purpose can help.
Causes
Aggression can be caused by many factors including physical discomfort, environmental factors and poor communication. If the person with Alzheimer's is aggressive, consider what might be contributing to the change in behavior.
Physical discomfort
Is the person able to let you know that he or she is experiencing physical pain? It is not uncommon for persons with Alzheimer's or other dementias to have urinary tract or other infections. Due to their loss of cognitive function, they are unable to articulate or identify the cause of physical discomfort and, therefore, may express it through physical aggression.
Is the person tired because of inadequate rest or sleep?
Is the person hungry or thirsty?
Are medications causing side effects? Side effects are especially likely to occur when individuals are taking multiple medications for several health conditions?
I think I'm starting to understand where @CirrhosisDawg is coming from now. -
He's angry mom didn't make meatloaf this week.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Alzheimer's AssociationCirrhosisDawg said:
Political beliefs? The bitch got what it deserved. A beat down.PurpleThrobber said:
So - in your world it's ok for someone to get beat down because of their political beliefs?CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC. A White trash trumptard got his ass beat. Is this really any more complicated than that? It will happen again tomorrow multiple times if that helps you cope.PurpleThrobber said:
Can you not read the legal concept provided?2001400ex said:
So you don't think context like what happened immediately before that matters? It sure mattered in the maga hat kids at the Lincoln memorial. Why is this story different?PurpleThrobber said:
My narrative is a legal basis. Doesn't much fucking matter what happened prior. I suppose if the camera dude pulled out a switchblade and starting menacing lefty, it's possible that was reasonable force. Camera guy must have stashed his weapon prior to the video. For sure. That's what happened.2001400ex said:Funny how we don't see what happened before or after and people are already jumping to conclusions to fit their narrative.
Otherwise, probably gonna be spending some time in the pokey. Civil damages will be interesting too. I'm sure camera guy is going through a tremendous amount of pain and suffering from the trauma.
What about what happened right after?
I have no idea what happened but don't you think there are more scenarios than what you described that could drastically change the opinion of what happened?
And to the fucktards. That's not defending. That's stating what I've said in all these, we need more information before we rush to judgement.
But some of you where this fits their narrative, judge based on a 23 second video.
The difference between the kid at the memorial is there was no battery involved. The assault was committed by Nathan Phillips. The MAGA kid's response was commensurate with the perceived threat. He just stood there and did nothing.
The lefty is going to claim self-defense. But he's still fucked since his response was excessive to the threat offered.
Interesting.
The Throbber isn't too worried about that - he lives at the remote guns and religion compound on high strategic ground. But when the beatdown for political views anarchy shit gets rolling in SoCal and other urban areas - you have a good time with that.
Maybe the trumpanzee will act differently next time since it can’t fight or debate to save its life (fuck that fool got clocked).
The trumpanzee will lose badly in court as well.
Enjoy your strategic compound! The real world in so cal is very nice. Your fear and anxiety is noted.
-Aggressive behaviors may be verbal or physical. They can occur suddenly, with no apparent reason, or result from a frustrating situation. While aggression can be hard to cope with, understanding that the person with Alzheimer's or dementia is not acting this way on purpose can help.
Causes
Aggression can be caused by many factors including physical discomfort, environmental factors and poor communication. If the person with Alzheimer's is aggressive, consider what might be contributing to the change in behavior.
Physical discomfort
Is the person able to let you know that he or she is experiencing physical pain? It is not uncommon for persons with Alzheimer's or other dementias to have urinary tract or other infections. Due to their loss of cognitive function, they are unable to articulate or identify the cause of physical discomfort and, therefore, may express it through physical aggression.
Is the person tired because of inadequate rest or sleep?
Is the person hungry or thirsty?
Are medications causing side effects? Side effects are especially likely to occur when individuals are taking multiple medications for several health conditions?
I think I'm starting to understand where @CirrhosisDawg is coming from now. -
Words are violence to the left
-
Meatloat done well is pretty goddamned delicious. Side of mashed potatoes heaped with butter....
brb, yo.
-
-
You don’t agree that Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and all of its representatives deserve to be punched in the face repeatedly and incessantly?
Good luck in the courts with that!
-
Thanks YuviCirrhosisDawg said:You don’t agree that Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and all of its representatives deserve to be punched in the face repeatedly and incessantly?
Good luck in the courts with that! -
YRYKRaceBannon said:
Thanks YuviCirrhosisDawg said:You don’t agree that Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and all of its representatives deserve to be punched in the face repeatedly and incessantly?
Good luck in the courts with that! -
Does your boyfriend's anus smell like curry?CirrhosisDawg said:
YRYKRaceBannon said:
Thanks YuviCirrhosisDawg said:You don’t agree that Charlie Kirk, TPUSA and all of its representatives deserve to be punched in the face repeatedly and incessantly?
Good luck in the courts with that!
-
Shocking news!
-
What the fuck does CNN have to do with that?
-
CNN radicalized him into an antifa terrorist. Can't you read?GrundleStiltzkin said:What the fuck does CNN have to do with that?
