"It’s more like one of these old fashioned cases filed on page 1 and dismissed on page 34,” Ron Kuby, a First Amendment and civil rights attorney, told TheWrap on Wednesday. “If you report two sides of an encounter, you know that one side is ultimately going to be proven incorrect. That doesn’t mean you’re open for defamation claims.”
"It’s more like one of these old fashioned cases filed on page 1 and dismissed on page 34,” Ron Kuby, a First Amendment and civil rights attorney, told TheWrap on Wednesday. “If you report two sides of an encounter, you know that one side is ultimately going to be proven incorrect. That doesn’t mean you’re open for defamation claims.”
"It’s more like one of these old fashioned cases filed on page 1 and dismissed on page 34,” Ron Kuby, a First Amendment and civil rights attorney, told TheWrap on Wednesday. “If you report two sides of an encounter, you know that one side is ultimately going to be proven incorrect. That doesn’t mean you’re open for defamation claims.”
Since the landmark 1964 United States Supreme Court decision New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, public figures have had a greater burden proving libel than unknown people do. The lawyers who spoke to TheWrap said it is an open question whether Sandmann is a public figure.
"It’s more like one of these old fashioned cases filed on page 1 and dismissed on page 34,” Ron Kuby, a First Amendment and civil rights attorney, told TheWrap on Wednesday. “If you report two sides of an encounter, you know that one side is ultimately going to be proven incorrect. That doesn’t mean you’re open for defamation claims.”
Since the landmark 1964 United States Supreme Court decision New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, public figures have had a greater burden proving libel than unknown people do. The lawyers who spoke to TheWrap said it is an open question whether Sandmann is a public figure.
I don't get that at all.
Yeah I didn't get that either. It is the wrap.com after all.
Hondo, you love swallowing like a bitch. I don't .
It's that simply. You love to lie and you love being lied to.
I have no commented one way or the other. Just made fun of people like you clinging to this story as if it's some liberal conspiracy.
You didn't comment on the MAGA hat wearing kids?
I commented making fun of y'all. I also posted the video showing what happened, before the original video, that came out two days later. I made fun of the kids mom for blaming his actions on Muslims. And I commented that it was fucktarded for the teachers to encourage the kids to do the tomahawk chant and not getting the kids out of there.
And I blasted you for ignoring the lies from Fox news (which I posted their link that lied) while ranting about lies from the mainstream media. While you struggled to find articles from the main stream media lying. I never once commented on the kid's actions, or the native drummer.
after reading that plus a couple of other sites with articles on him, I suspect that if it was a left leaning person filing the same against Brietbart, he would say just the opposite.
after reading that plus a couple of other sites with articles on him, I suspect that if it was a left leaning person filing the same against Brietbart, he would say just the opposite.
Comments
I don't get that at all.
after reading that plus a couple of other sites with articles on him, I suspect that if it was a left leaning person filing the same against Brietbart, he would say just the opposite.