Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

lawsandl and djduck are

1…5681011…13

Comments

  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    edited March 2019
    lawsandl said:

    Here is the difference. Maybe this will spell it out for you.

    Oregon will play Carlberg or Baker with Faoliu and Scott at Nose Tackle. Jelks last year played the spot that Baker/Carlberg will take.

    KT will not play one of those spots that Jelks did.

    Here is another way of looking at it. Jelks played a 5 technique. KT will play a 9 technique. One requires more power than the other.

    Also, DJ looks like imposing with a wide ass and arms down to his knees. You are being obnoxious.

    It's the same fucking thing you idiot. Only difference is one is line up outside a tackle and one is line up outside a TE. Both go against tackles on a regular basis. Will KT's job be to contain the edge against the run the same as Jelks? Yes. Will he be going against 6'7 and 6'8 320 pound tackles the same as Jelks? Yes. Is he as big and developed as Jelks? No. Will he get manhandled against the run? Yes. It's that fucking simple. You stupid ass quooks think some 235-240 pound true Freshman is just gonna come in and dominate grown men and it's retarded. Wake the fuck up. Roster wise, Oregon is at best 3rd in the North. Herbert is the only reason for optimism. Without him Oregon would be retard fighting the Beavs for last place in the North next season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • lawsandl
    lawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    edited March 2019
    StrongArmCobra said:

    lawsandl said:

    Here is the difference. Maybe this will spell it out for you.

    Oregon will play Carlberg or Baker with Faoliu and Scott at Nose Tackle. Jelks last year played the spot that Baker/Carlberg will take.

    KT will not play one of those spots that Jelks did.

    Here is another way of looking at it. Jelks played a 5 technique. KT will play a 9 technique. One requires more power than the other.

    Also, DJ looks like imposing with a wide ass and arms down to his knees. You are being obnoxious.

    It's the same fucking thing you idiot. Only difference is one is line up outside a tackle and one is line up outside a TE. Both go against tackles on a regular basis. Will KT's job be to contain the edge against the run the same as Jelks? Yes. Will he be going against 6'7 and 6'8 320 pound tackles the same as Jelks? Yes. Is he as big and developed as Jelks? No. Will he get manhandled against the run? Yes. It's that fucking simple. You stupid ass quooks think some 235-240 pound true Freshman is just gonna come in and dominate grown men and it's retarded. Wake the fuck up. Roster wise, Oregon is at best 3rd in the North. Herbert is the only reason for optimism. Without him Oregon would be retard fighting the Beavs for last place in the North next season.
    There is a huge difference in what is needed skill wise. It's not even funny how block headed you're being. By your Doog logic everyone needs to be able to take on 6'8" 320 tackles. A 5 tech always occupies the tackle. A 9 tech just needs to contain and force the ball inside. KT's objective #1 when going against a tackle will be to rush the pass and bend the edge, which is an elite skill he possesses. KT will will play next to a 5 tech that will occupy the tackle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    HillsboroDuck said:

    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.

    Or just poor bleach into your eyes so you don't have to see it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.

    Or just poor bleach into your eyes so you don't have to see it.
    Pour effort
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    HillsboroDuck said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.

    Or just poor bleach into your eyes so you don't have to see it.
    Pour effort
    I wasn't joking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.

    Or just poor bleach into your eyes so you don't have to see it.
    Pour effort
    I wasn't joking.
    Whoooooooosh, again.

    Not that I'm surprised.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    haie said:

    creepycoug said:

    This is just more doogery dude. You can't jump on that "we demanded better" crowd my friend. Your motives are quite different, and you know it.

    Nevertheless, I don't know who is doing the proclaiming. That's the fs media, and of course there are as many quooks as there are doogs. It's a problem common to all programs who've had a taste of winning. The base of your claim goes something like this: the ubiquitous "they" proclaim in early 2019 Oregon as the favorite in the north. therefore, their program is a joke. OK!

    As you said, we have different definitions. By yours, you are the champ of a conference full of jokes. Congrats.

    I graduated during the height of the Sark Burger at Schultzy's and saw the program go from dead to a joke. The fuck I can't be in that crowd.

    Their program is a joke because it's all hype and no substance. I don't believe in their coaching staff. Win the road games in Palo Alto, Seattle, etc and I'll change my tune.

    We bounced back and won the conference on the road like fucking wardaddy's.

    They weren't a joke 3-4 years ago.

    We're a champ in a conference with problems. WAzzu isn't a joke, Utah isn't a joke. ASU might be pretty good. Cal isn't a joke anymore. Stanford obviously isn't a joke. SC is embarrassing.

    You are such a quook.
    My quook goes as far as your doog.

    war daddy's? I laffed. Pretty soon you're going to sound like those Cane fans in the mid 2000s with all that swagger crap.

    If Cal isn't a joke, how can Oregon be? Do you really think Utah and WSU are on another level? I know: from the mouth of doogs. You don't believe in the staff after one season? In which they improved over the last season? And then hauled in a great class?

    There is nothing about that staff that should leave you with anything more than LIPO unless you are a doog, which you most certainly are. Here's a difference between objectively looking at a thing and wishing for it to be the way you want it to be.

    Better d, better running game, fewer penalties. Lack of receivers hampered the passing game. And they beat Washington. Not great; not bad.

    if they're a joke, they're in good company in the PAC 12. Look at the collective bowl performance. Tells you what you need to know.
    I'll take Cal, WSU, Utah, and Stanford's coaching staffs over Oregon's easily. If they win something this year, I'll change my tune. You have to say after the past 2 seasons that Utah and WSU are on another level. Stanford got lucky, but here we are.

    I'm not sure what your point is. LIPO? Sure. But I can make some assumptions at this point. UW and Stanford have a better chance and path to win the division. They're the North champs until they arent.
    You're not sure what my point is? Why are you a fucking retard and can't read? The English is clear enough. The point is that your post about Oregon being a joke at this point is retarded. Just a cursory look around the conference and what everyone accomplished in their bowl games makes your pressing point about WSU and Utah rather stupid. If you like sounding like a retard, please don't let me cramp your style. Oregon had ups and downs during the season; they're not that good. Big surprise. They've dropped another one to WSU. Washington couldn't beat fucking Cal. We can do this all day.

    There isn't much point trading thoughts with you about Oregon. You are who I know you to be. I've not seen you write a single objective thought on the topic since I've been here. And, sure, do whatever the fuck you want. If it were me, I'd spend more time trying to figure out if my team is really just the smartest retard in the class or if it just got dropped into the wrong school. You just got your ass kicked by a middle-of-the-road Ohio State team after getting your ass kicked by Penn State the year before. Style points don't count for people who watch the game. Pop off about the North if you want; the day I see Miami popping off about the Coastal Division is the day I move on. But to each his own.
    I'm trying to be reasonable here. You're just being a cunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Ballz
    Ballz Member Posts: 4,735
    HillsboroDuck said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    StrongArmCobra said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    Lawsandl is terrible but Ballz is somehow even worse.

    Nuke the bored.

    Or just poor bleach into your eyes so you don't have to see it.
    Pour effort
    I wasn't joking.
    Whoooooooosh, again.

    Not that I'm surprised.

    Whatever.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    edited March 2019
    backthepack said:

    creepycoug said:

    backthepack said:

    Shut the fuck up creep.


    Jesus christ.

    Watch it boy.
    Just stop fucking talking.
    Fuck off and quit trying to act tuff. You're a pussy and it's awkward.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter