Hondo and his merry comrades will be upset


Comments
-
Meh, nothing too bothersome in there.
A 47/47 split on Medicare For All given the framing is good imho.
I do enjoy 77% of republicans wanting the government to leave them alone. Reminds me of when they hated Obamacare but liked the ACA. -
-
Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be? -
Paid by taxes paid by someone else. Once you tell them that their taxes will have to raised in order to pay for it support for it craters2001400ex said: -
That the Rat party can't even get to 50% on capitalism is telling. The commies are getting numerous.
-
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time. -
Single payer won't save shit. Still have all the freeloaders that have to be paid for. HTH2001400ex said:
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time. -
Don't you think it would save money having those freeloaders getting preventative care rather than using the ER?Sledog said:
Single payer won't save shit. Still have all the freeloaders that have to be paid for. HTH2001400ex said:
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time.
Or is that too complicated for your brain to handle? -
I’ll vote yesMikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be? -
Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.
-
So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?Sledog said:Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.
-
A
“Paid by taxes other people wil pay, the rich!” I’m all in!2001400ex said:
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time.
Literally one small population country has single payer.
Saying “common sense” doesn’t help your logical fallacious argument. It just makes it a logical fallacy.
The Common Sense Fallacy (or ‘Appeal to Common Sense’) is somewhat related to the Argument from Popularity and/or the Argument from Tradition. However, it differs from these fallacies by not necessarily relying on popularity or tradition.
Instead, common sense relies on the vague notion of ‘obviousness’, which means something like ‘what we perceive from personal experience’ or ‘what we should know without having had to learn.’ In other words, common sense is not necessarily supported by evidence or reasoning. As such, beliefs based on common sense are unreliable. The fallacy lies in giving too much weight to common sense in drawing conclusions, at the expense of evidence and reasoning.
In some ways, scientific methods have been developed to avoid the errors that can result from common sense. For instance, common sense used to tell us that the Earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around the Earth – because that is the way things appear to us without scientific investigation. Another example of ‘common sense’ is that the world appears to have been designed, so therefore there must have been a designer.
Einstein’s theories of relativity were initially resisted, even by the scientific community, because they defied common sense. They seemed to belong more in the realm of science fiction than reality, until they were later verified by scientific observations. Our modern Global Positioning System (GPS) now uses Einstein’s relativity theories. This initial resistance may have led Einstein to later say that ”Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down by the mind before you reach eighteen” .
Your anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. I know people who have cancer who were cured with out any financial hardship. So fuck off
-
Lol.MikeDamone said:A
“Paid by taxes other people wil pay, the rich!” I’m all in!2001400ex said:
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time.
Literally one small population country has single payer.
Saying “common sense” doesn’t help your logical fallacious argument. It just makes it a logical fallacy.
The Common Sense Fallacy (or ‘Appeal to Common Sense’) is somewhat related to the Argument from Popularity and/or the Argument from Tradition. However, it differs from these fallacies by not necessarily relying on popularity or tradition.
Instead, common sense relies on the vague notion of ‘obviousness’, which means something like ‘what we perceive from personal experience’ or ‘what we should know without having had to learn.’ In other words, common sense is not necessarily supported by evidence or reasoning. As such, beliefs based on common sense are unreliable. The fallacy lies in giving too much weight to common sense in drawing conclusions, at the expense of evidence and reasoning.
In some ways, scientific methods have been developed to avoid the errors that can result from common sense. For instance, common sense used to tell us that the Earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around the Earth – because that is the way things appear to us without scientific investigation. Another example of ‘common sense’ is that the world appears to have been designed, so therefore there must have been a designer.
Einstein’s theories of relativity were initially resisted, even by the scientific community, because they defied common sense. They seemed to belong more in the realm of science fiction than reality, until they were later verified by scientific observations. Our modern Global Positioning System (GPS) now uses Einstein’s relativity theories. This initial resistance may have led Einstein to later say that ”Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down by the mind before you reach eighteen” .
Your anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. I know people who have cancer who were cured with out any financial hardship. So fuck off -
But muh common sense!allpurpleallgold said:
Lol.MikeDamone said:A
“Paid by taxes other people wil pay, the rich!” I’m all in!2001400ex said:
That's not what the poll said. It said "and pays by taxes". Most people with common sense knows going to single payer will save money. And the vast majority of people will pay less out of pocket. And we can end the bullshit of medical tied to work.MikeDamone said:Most people are idiots. Did we discover something new here?
Here’s a poll. “Should a billionaire give you a million dollars?”
I wonder what the results would be?
I know two people currently with cancer who can't leave their job because of medical insurance. One has a very good plan that is allowing an alternative treatment that most won't cover. The other wants to go out on his own but can't because his medical would cost too much.
Those are isolated instances but that shit happens all the time.
Literally one small population country has single payer.
Saying “common sense” doesn’t help your logical fallacious argument. It just makes it a logical fallacy.
The Common Sense Fallacy (or ‘Appeal to Common Sense’) is somewhat related to the Argument from Popularity and/or the Argument from Tradition. However, it differs from these fallacies by not necessarily relying on popularity or tradition.
Instead, common sense relies on the vague notion of ‘obviousness’, which means something like ‘what we perceive from personal experience’ or ‘what we should know without having had to learn.’ In other words, common sense is not necessarily supported by evidence or reasoning. As such, beliefs based on common sense are unreliable. The fallacy lies in giving too much weight to common sense in drawing conclusions, at the expense of evidence and reasoning.
In some ways, scientific methods have been developed to avoid the errors that can result from common sense. For instance, common sense used to tell us that the Earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around the Earth – because that is the way things appear to us without scientific investigation. Another example of ‘common sense’ is that the world appears to have been designed, so therefore there must have been a designer.
Einstein’s theories of relativity were initially resisted, even by the scientific community, because they defied common sense. They seemed to belong more in the realm of science fiction than reality, until they were later verified by scientific observations. Our modern Global Positioning System (GPS) now uses Einstein’s relativity theories. This initial resistance may have led Einstein to later say that ”Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down by the mind before you reach eighteen” .
Your anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. I know people who have cancer who were cured with out any financial hardship. So fuck off -
I'm AGAINST cancer
-
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
-
Which means you’re for global warming (consuming more cow)MikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
-
I fart so I cause global warming. Difference is mine make noise. I'm petty sure a lot of people on here can't make a sound!Baseman said:
Which means you’re for global warming (consuming more cow)MikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
-
The Throbber is putting in work on liver disease.MikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
-
Throbber and bitchfork 2020.PurpleThrobber said:
The Throbber is putting in work on liver disease.MikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
Spreading hpv far and wide -
Fixed for accuracy.PurpleThrobber said:
The Throbber is putting in work onMikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
liver diseaseVD. -
Fuck you and your 53 seconds.Pitchfork51 said:
Throbber and bitchfork 2020.PurpleThrobber said:
The Throbber is putting in work on liver disease.MikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
Spreading hpv far and wide -
The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS2001400ex said:
So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?Sledog said:Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.
Muh common sense!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571 -
Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.MikeDamone said:
The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS2001400ex said:
So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?Sledog said:Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.
Muh common sense!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work. -
Who could have predicted that??2001400ex said:MikeDamone said:
The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS2001400ex said:
So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?Sledog said:Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.
Muh common sense!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.
I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
Go fuck yourself #clockworkshill -
pawz said:
Fixed for accuracy.PurpleThrobber said:
The Throbber is putting in work onMikeDamone said:
Me too. I’m for heart disease though.RaceBannon said:I'm AGAINST cancer
liver diseaseVD.
-
I would have liked to see a GOP plan myself. They lost the house by being gutless and not doing what they were voted in to do
-
They had 8 years of control and the last two with the presidency as well.RaceBannon said:I would have liked to see a GOP plan myself. They lost the house by being gutless and not doing what they were voted in to do
-
They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us
But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60