Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

AOC Calls for Interring Japanese-Americans

1246

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Why is NPR hosting a photo-shopped document, why is Slate linking to the photo-shopped document they claim they received from AOC why are you such a gullible dipshit?


    The mysteries of life.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    It says the faq is not part of the Green New Deal. What’s the problem?

    Whether it’s photoshopped or not, it’s someone that’s not funny trying to be funny. It makes your argument seem really weak when you focus on a nothing issue like this.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,612 Founders Club
    Its not fucktarded to believe what they wrote

    It is fucktarded to write it
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    Also the fact that you would say “even Slate” shows out of touch with reality you are. Slate is establishment garbage. They hate progressives.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter

    If I like my Japanese neighbors can I keep them?

    No, but you can keep their land.
    Southcenter Shopping Mall? True?
    Just don't fuck with the Odin Brewery!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited February 2019

    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    It says the faq is not part of the Green New Deal. What’s the problem?

    Whether it’s photoshopped or not, it’s someone that’s not funny trying to be funny. It makes your argument seem really weak when you focus on a nothing issue like this.

    But then there was the unofficial version. Early in the day, Ocasio-Cortez’s office sent out a FAQ to reporters that read a bit like the Green New Deal Uncensored—as if the resolution had gotten drunk at an office party decided to tell its co-workers exactly what it thought of them. Nuclear?

    What is my "argument" Kunt? My argument is that Hondo is a gullible fucking moron who is claiming a document that was sent out by AOC and then hosted by NPR and linked to by Slate was photoshopped.

    That's my argument. If you want to get on-board Hondo's dipshit train hop on it pal. Choo-choo dumbfuck.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    Also the fact that you would say “even Slate” shows out of touch with reality you are. Slate is establishment garbage. They hate progressives.
    The purge for ideological purity is already begun.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    It says the faq is not part of the Green New Deal. What’s the problem?

    Whether it’s photoshopped or not, it’s someone that’s not funny trying to be funny. It makes your argument seem really weak when you focus on a nothing issue like this.

    But then there was the unofficial version. Early in the day, Ocasio-Cortez’s office sent out a FAQ to reporters that read a bit like the Green New Deal Uncensored—as if the resolution had gotten drunk at an office party decided to tell its co-workers exactly what it thought of them. Nuclear?

    What is my "argument" Kunt? My argument is that Hondo is a gullible fucking moron who is claiming a document that was sent out by AOC and then hosted by NPR and linked to by Slate was photoshopped.

    That's my argument. If you want to get on-board Hondo's dipshit train hop on it pal. Choo-choo dumbfuck.
    Call me when they ban farting cows and airplanes. Idiot.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,612 Founders Club

    SFGbob said:

    Oh no, even Slate is now linking to the "photo-shopped" document and they are claiming it came from AOC It's a conspiracy against Socialism!!!

    https://slate.com/business/2019/02/green-new-deal-faq-ocasio-cortez-rollout-confusion.html

    It says the faq is not part of the Green New Deal. What’s the problem?

    Whether it’s photoshopped or not, it’s someone that’s not funny trying to be funny. It makes your argument seem really weak when you focus on a nothing issue like this.
    She wrote it and the cleaned up version isn't much better. Politics is about finding stuff like cow farts to make a lasting impression good or bad. Trump said there were good people on both sides. Kind of but it stuck

    Cow farts will stick

    They still want to eliminate all fossil fuels which is insane all by itself. Using jets and trains to illustrate that is fair game IMO

    She needs to take the abuse and stand tall and deliver her message and take back the high ground like any other politician does. To back track and stretch it out 30 more years when we are in a 12 year death spiral isn't going to make enough people take her seriously

    I'll acknowledge I am a lost cause and need to die off (like that will happen) but it isn't just old fucks laughing at this point
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    Its not fucktarded to believe what they wrote

    It is fucktarded to write it

    I agree it was a stupid thing to write. But your representation of it is a lie. It says we’re going for net zero and not zero because we won’t be able to get rid of these things. How is altering your goal because there are things you can’t get rid of calling for a ban on those things?

    Someone thought it was funny, why can’t we do zero, can’t get rid of planes, or cow farts, haha.

    Who cares.