Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Illegals far more dangerous than long guns including "assault weapons"

2»

Comments

  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    So, what are the answers to your questions?

    Since there are so many definitions, go ahead and tell us what they all are.

    We're are all waiting to be enlightened by your brilliance.

    Use your words, as many as you need. No need to hide behind your mother's skirt.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,156 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Again, please answer your own questions. I'm sure you have a brilliant response to every question you proposed, while trying to deflect.
    You have the opportunity to put this question to bed, never to be asked again.

    Now, go ahead. Momma won't wait dinner all night.
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    Hey Hondo, where did you run and hide?

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blu82 said:

    Hey Hondo, where did you run and hide?

    Hi there!

    The questions were rhetorical fuckstick. And everyone with half a brain knows the answers.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,889 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    Ok make it 10 billion

    Do you have a point?

    No
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Ok make it 10 billion

    Do you have a point?

    No

    Yes. That $5 billion or even $10 billion towards a wall won't stop people from coming in.

    A wall is old tech. Use the money for something that will actually help the problem.

    Is that lost on you? I've only said that like a hundred times.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,889 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    Wall Built. Deter. Slow. Down. Stop. Illegal Immigrants. Harder. To. cross. border.

    Walls don't work is the dumbest argument ever. Of course they work.


    Fun byproduct: annoying virtue signaling hippies with "Humanitarian Aid is never a crime" and, "No human being is illegal" bumper stickers and yard signs will lose it.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    Wall Built. Deter. Slow. Down. Stop. Illegal Immigrants. Harder. To. cross. border.

    Walls don't work is the dumbest argument ever. Of course they work.


    Fun byproduct: annoying virtue signaling hippies with "Humanitarian Aid is never a crime" and, "No human being is illegal" bumper stickers and yard signs will lose it.
    If you lost Bill you lost
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,842 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    We build a big wall. It'll be really hard to climb over. It won't be easy to tunnel under. We arrest and immediately return all illegals crossing.

    We install more technology to prevent smuggling and detect illegals trying to enter illegals.

    We pass new laws that say you cannot employ or rent housing to illegals. If caught here and you are illegal you may not apply to become a citizen in the USA for 15 years. If you commit a crime we contract with Mexico and you can serve your time in a Mexican prison and never be allowed citizenship in the USA.

    They'll rapidly self deport. We forcibly deport the rest. Round 'em and ship 'em out!

    We can allow an ample number to enter on work permits to provide agricultural labor etc. But if they violate the roles they're out. If they're good maybe we provide an incentive regarding citizenship.

    They get in line like everyone else. We can't reward them for coming illegally. The increase came because our rumors of amnesty. No amnesty. Ever again.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,842 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Ok make it 10 billion

    Do you have a point?

    No

    Yes. That $5 billion or even $10 billion towards a wall won't stop people from coming in.

    A wall is old tech. Use the money for something that will actually help the problem.

    Is that lost on you? I've only said that like a hundred times.
    Ok if all the dems and lib movie stars etc. Removeal their walls around their homes since they're old tech and don't work. And all the walls and fences in DC around the house and state plus their offices. No security check points. We can pretend those exterior walls around Senate and House offices don't exist. Won't need security either as its all old tech.

    So if you install an alarm at your house do you quit using the licks and leave the windows open?

    Doofus!
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    We build a big wall. It'll be really hard to climb over. It won't be easy to tunnel under. We arrest and immediately return all illegals crossing.

    We install more technology to prevent smuggling and detect illegals trying to enter illegals.

    We pass new laws that say you cannot employ or rent housing to illegals. If caught here and you are illegal you may not apply to become a citizen in the USA for 15 years. If you commit a crime we contract with Mexico and you can serve your time in a Mexican prison and never be allowed citizenship in the USA.

    They'll rapidly self deport. We forcibly deport the rest. Round 'em and ship 'em out!

    We can allow an ample number to enter on work permits to provide agricultural labor etc. But if they violate the roles they're out. If they're good maybe we provide an incentive regarding citizenship.

    They get in line like everyone else. We can't reward them for coming illegally. The increase came because our rumors of amnesty. No amnesty. Ever again.
    What increase? Net immigration is close to zero since 08. And most of it is from people entering illegally and overstaying their Visa.

    Not to mention, this isn't a sea to Sea wall idiot. It's like 200 miles out of 2,000.

    That being said, I do support better technology at border crossings and the use of virtual walls, like already used in some places. I'm more worried about drugs and such coming through the border than bodies. Cause of facts and stuff.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,842 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    We build a big wall. It'll be really hard to climb over. It won't be easy to tunnel under. We arrest and immediately return all illegals crossing.

    We install more technology to prevent smuggling and detect illegals trying to enter illegals.

    We pass new laws that say you cannot employ or rent housing to illegals. If caught here and you are illegal you may not apply to become a citizen in the USA for 15 years. If you commit a crime we contract with Mexico and you can serve your time in a Mexican prison and never be allowed citizenship in the USA.

    They'll rapidly self deport. We forcibly deport the rest. Round 'em and ship 'em out!

    We can allow an ample number to enter on work permits to provide agricultural labor etc. But if they violate the roles they're out. If they're good maybe we provide an incentive regarding citizenship.

    They get in line like everyone else. We can't reward them for coming illegally. The increase came because our rumors of amnesty. No amnesty. Ever again.
    What increase? Net immigration is close to zero since 08. And most of it is from people entering illegally and overstaying their Visa.

    Not to mention, this isn't a sea to Sea wall idiot. It's like 200 miles out of 2,000.

    That being said, I do support better technology at border crossings and the use of virtual walls, like already used in some places. I'm more worried about drugs and such coming through the border than bodies. Cause of facts and stuff.
    Numbers Bullshit like you.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,842 Standard Supporter
    Where the hell did the edit button go?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,842 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Why make them a separate class of weapons?
    Almost like you have an agenda. White Hispanic?

    Lol how cute you think I don't know what an assault weapon is. Do you want the media/politician definition? Or the definition from legislation? Or what the definition should be?
    Liberals can't figure it out because assault weapons can't just be purchased over the counter. Scary looking is thier default definition. Hence your earlier answer.
    Yes there are some dumb liberals that think anything but a hunting rifle is an assault rifle. There are also smart people who want to reduce gun related deaths.
    Then stop the illegals coming in with guns.

    If the smart people were committed to reducing gun deaths - there's 4,166 right there for the taking.

    Explain how the wall funding Trump proposed will reduce the deaths caused by illegals?
    Fewer will come in. Democrats were for walls until orange guy was for it.
    Ok. Explain how that $5 billion will let fewer in.
    We build a big wall. It'll be really hard to climb over. It won't be easy to tunnel under. We arrest and immediately return all illegals crossing.

    We install more technology to prevent smuggling and detect illegals trying to enter illegals.

    We pass new laws that say you cannot employ or rent housing to illegals. If caught here and you are illegal you may not apply to become a citizen in the USA for 15 years. If you commit a crime we contract with Mexico and you can serve your time in a Mexican prison and never be allowed citizenship in the USA.

    They'll rapidly self deport. We forcibly deport the rest. Round 'em and ship 'em out!

    We can allow an ample number to enter on work permits to provide agricultural labor etc. But if they violate the roles they're out. If they're good maybe we provide an incentive regarding citizenship.

    They get in line like everyone else. We can't reward them for coming illegally. The increase came because our rumors of amnesty. No amnesty. Ever again.
    What increase? Net immigration is close to zero since 08. And most of it is from people entering illegally and overstaying their Visa.

    Not to mention, this isn't a sea to Sea wall idiot. It's like 200 miles out of 2,000.

    That being said, I do support better technology at border crossings and the use of virtual walls, like already used in some places. I'm more worried about drugs and such coming through the border than bodies. Cause of facts and stuff.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi626njtavgAhU5JTQIHWYNBEoQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/border-patrol-arrests-record-number-of-illegals-crossing-southern-border&psig=AOvVaw2o-ovvx0pbOyINtOhZWExW&ust=1549690676049346&cshid=1549604273877
Sign In or Register to comment.