What society?

WestlinnDuck

Well, I would say a free and independent citizenry of the United States of America would. Leftards have no problem arming the police with 17 bullet Glock magazines and 30 bullet AR-15 magazines. Apparently, cops need “assault” rifles and high capacity pistol magazines to protect themselves from violent criminals. But the peasants? Nope.

I would say a nation that has a Second Amendment would. I would say that some Venezuelan citizens might appreciate an AR-15 about right now. Make no mistake, Kameltoe and the rest of the leftards running for president don’t give a sh*t about the kids. If they did, Giuliani would be revered by the left for all the kids he saved in NYC. This is all about what every leftard government on the planet wants – a disarmed citizenry.

https://hotair.com/archives/2019/01/29/kamala-harris-kind-civil-society-tolerates-assault-weapons-peoples-hands/
More Kamala Harris: What kind of civil society tolerates “assault weapons” in the people’s hands?
AllahpunditPosted at 11:21 am on January 29, 2019

HHusky

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

UW_Doog_Bot

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

HHusky

I have no idea. I concur with you that we may want stricter regulations than those that have been proposed.

WestlinnDuck

If gun confiscation wasn't like oxygen to a leftard, you may have a point.

GrundleStiltzkin

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

HHusky

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

GrundleStiltzkin

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

HHusky

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.

When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.

greenblood

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

HHusky

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.

When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.

Censor violent movies and TV shows

Censor video games

Keep children off of social media

I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING

UW_Doog_Bot

I propose secure gun lock boxes and locking ammo up separately. It reduces gun violence by something ridiculous like 80%. I'm even willing to bend the knee to the state in this instance and allow purchases of such safety devices to be tax exempt in the name of public safety.

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.

When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.

Censor violent movies and TV shows

Censor video games

Keep children off of social media

I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING

There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.

GrundleStiltzkin

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.

When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.

Censor violent movies and TV shows

Censor video games

Keep children off of social media

I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING

There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.

So you support the Bill of Rights then?

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Proudly brandishing your ignorance as you are, you should not be expressing opinions on firearms regulation.

I know we need more. I can count bodies. Your side just tells me we need more people armed. That hasn’t worked.

When you support any proposed regulation, let me know. Because you know guns, I’ll welcome your input.

Censor violent movies and TV shows

Censor video games

Keep children off of social media

I just hit three major liberal donor groups but we need to DO SOMETHING

There are times you seem to favor a more expansive First Amendment than I do. This isn’t one of those times.

I support the first and second amendments

Sorry you missed that obvious point

We need to get rid of guns but lets not worry about what turns kids to killers. Because we basically can't

That's freedom. No school shootings in the old Soviet Union

greenblood

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

RaceBannon

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

Careful

Hondo has a single mother

SFGbob

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.

HHusky

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You a

SFGbob said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.

There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.

greenblood

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

Again, what are you proposing? Should we expand the removal of kids from parents and the categories of unfitness to parent? You a

SFGbob said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

greenblood said:

HHusky said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Just a traditional NRA position before it became a gun manufacturers’ lobbying group. Were you always a rube, or did it just start coming on in your old age?

Can you name a shooting where an assault weapon covered by the NFA has ever been used?

@HHusky has no idea what the NFA is or what it regulates, nor what an assault weapon is.

Nor do I care, assuming it’s as ineffective as you claim. I’m interested in reducing gun violence. Shockingly, simply distributing more and more guns has been an ineffective strategy.

Guns are fun and guns are cool. Let's worry more about instructing proper gun training.

Also, It's a popular political strategy to blame the gun rather than dead beat parents who suck at raising their kids.

So you propose grabbing kids instead of guns. What does that solution look like?

Child neglect is a much bigger problem than gun violence, and if you fix that, it will do more for stopping gun violence than gun confiscation. A gun ban doesn't stop gangs, and other criminals from acquiring guns. But providing a child with proper parenting and support helps prevent the child from joining a gang and becoming a criminal. Ask Chicago how the gun ban is going...it's a simple fact.

I recall O'Keefed scoffing at the idea that we should try a discourage people from having kids out of wedlock as some kind of quaint and antiquated form of morality from days past.

There’s that infamous “memory” of yours.

I'm saying we need to have more government ran community outreach programs to help families. These programs can run somewhat like the YMCA programs. Also, like the mission, we need to have food shelters designed specifically for families. And yes, more enforcement of DHS.