Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,927 Founders Club
    No bigger Trumpet than #aclockworkshill #rightontim

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,204
    2001400ex said:
    I thought this was going to be about your lie regarding the rich paying a greater percentage of the income tax back in the 1950s than they do today.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    34 > 42 according to Bob.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,204
    Poor reading comprehension from Hondo.


    Doesn't understand the difference between income taxes and an overall tax rate. So you're either lying Hondo our you're a fucking moron. Take your pick.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,204
    How could it be that the tax code of the 1950s had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent, but resulted in an effective tax rate of only 42 percent on the wealthiest taxpayers? In fact, the situation is even stranger. The 42.0 percent tax rate on the top 1 percent takes into account all taxes levied by federal, state, and local governments, including: income, payroll, corporate, excise, property, and estate taxes. When we look at income taxes specifically, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid an average effective rate of only 16.9 percent in income taxes during the 1950s.[4]
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    How could it be that the tax code of the 1950s had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent, but resulted in an effective tax rate of only 42 percent on the wealthiest taxpayers? In fact, the situation is even stranger. The 42.0 percent tax rate on the top 1 percent takes into account all taxes levied by federal, state, and local governments, including: income, payroll, corporate, excise, property, and estate taxes. When we look at income taxes specifically, the top 1 percent of taxpayers paid an average effective rate of only 16.9 percent in income taxes during the 1950s.[4]

    Like I said 34.1% greater than 42% according to Bob.

    photo 0DF7B9D3-342E-49DA-B41C-0D5FE4699E3A_zpss7urveod.png


    Now STFU you obsessed little bitch.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,204
    Like I said, Hondo's so fucking stupid he doesn't understand the difference between the percentage of income taxes paid and an overall tax rates.

    Got to love how Mr. Reading comprehension is either flat out lying or is too stupid to understand the distinction. Appears you're having the same reading comprehension problem in that other thread with that table you trying to defend Hondo.


  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Like I said, Hondo's so fucking stupid he doesn't understand the difference between the percentage of income taxes paid and an overall tax rates.

    Got to love how Mr. Reading comprehension is either flat out lying or is too stupid to understand the distinction. Appears you're having the same reading comprehension problem in that other thread with that table you trying to defend Hondo.


    Read..... Yes read..... Both of our links are all taxes, not just federal income.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,204
    Poor reading comprehension.

Sign In or Register to comment.