Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Finally we get to the truth
“The indictment of Roger Stone makes clear that there was a deliberate, coordinated attempt by top Trump campaign officials to influence the 2016 election and subvert the will of the American people,” the Democratic leader said in a statement. “It is staggering that the president has chosen to surround himself with people who violated the integrity of our democracy and lied to the FBI and Congress about it.”
Running for office and successfully influencing voters to vote for you is now a crime
If you're Trump and you beat Hillary
11 ·
Comments
Funniest thing I've seen here in some time.
Link?
It's time to post this again:
There were a hell of a lot more than 2 criminal indictments coming out of the Clinton Admin
If your source is willing to claim that obvious lie what other numbers are they claiming that are total bullshit.
https://samsmitharchives.wordpress.com/2013/08/25/the-clinton-legacy/
2. While looking for the real numbers I found the source of the graph. It came from a DailyKos article, a known partisan site who spout unproven rhetoric.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/11/1619079/-Comparing-Presidential-Administrations-by-Arrests-and-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
3. Fuck off.
2) it's not a graph, it's a table.
3) read the heading of it. It says executive branch. No one is saying the investigation under Clinton didn't produce anything or that Clinton was clean. It just wasn't his executive branch.
4) your better argument, is to say it's lying with stats by only including executive branch.
5) I do have an appreciation for providing links to support your point. But I do chuckle when the link in your first point was just as partisan as the source in the second point that you bash for being partisan.
6) you hate facts.