Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
But your side is always trying Hondo. They can't control an armed population and they are afraid their treason will one day be rewarded with lead. HTH
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
But your side is always trying Hondo. They can't control an armed population and they are afraid their treason will one day be rewarded with lead. HTH
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
The walls did work as I bet not one of those home invaders came in through the wall. Instead they were forced into a chokepoint (the door), where one armed man was able to defeat five armed men.
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
But your side is always trying Hondo. They can't control an armed population and they are afraid their treason will one day be rewarded with lead. HTH
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Dianne the bitch is just introducing an assault weapons ban. HTH
That will go no where (yes zero chance of passing) and doesn't take any gun from anyone. And doesn't end any ability to defend your home with a gun.
Suddenly, you aren't worried about all the Money this little PR stunt is costing?
Comments
Did I not read that for comprehension?
If it saves just one life!
Although your implication is that legislators want to end people having guns in their own home for protection. Care to point to the source of that implication?
Red flag laws when a court order can't be obtained. Similar to Presidents using executive orders when they can't get congress to move.
Yes CNBC is my source