Sources
Comments
-
I solve problems by ignoring them - they all go away eventually or I will. This is how most politicians deal with issues also
-
His "successful" Montana burger stand.MikeDamone said:
He’s a fucking liar. There is your answer. He won’t donate here. He claims to be “successful”. Yet he is here seemingly 24/7. Not an hour goes by when this retard won’t post. The only conclusion is he doesn’t do much else.HoustonHusky said:I'm confused HondoFS. You seem to have time to poast new threads but you seem to have forgotten about your thread yesterday about how Trump was going to get impeached. Amazing too how you can afford to fly around and talk about TSA lines but you can't seem to afford to pitch in to pay the light bill around here.
Almost like you are a low IQ lying sack of shite or something...
And since you are a moron, I realize you don't understand that the WP saying the SC "signaled it might not" does not mean in any way, shape for form the definitive "isn't going to" and ruling against Trump you interpreted with your speed limit IQ (they could take the case and rule one way or another, they could not and send it to back to the lower court with guidance one way or another on things to interpret, etc...).
HondoFS...
read: he flips burgers at mcdonalds
-
Where did I say he was going to be impeached? Read what I post. You have me confused with someone else.HoustonHusky said:I'm confused HondoFS. You seem to have time to poast new threads but you seem to have forgotten about your thread yesterday about how Trump was going to get impeached. Amazing too how you can afford to fly around and talk about TSA lines but you can't seem to afford to pitch in to pay the light bill around here.
Almost like you are a low IQ lying sack of shite or something...
And since you are a moron, I realize you don't understand that the WP saying the SC "signaled it might not" does not mean in any way, shape for form the definitive "isn't going to" and ruling against Trump you interpreted with your speed limit IQ (they could take the case and rule one way or another, they could not and send it to back to the lower court with guidance one way or another on things to interpret, etc...).
HondoFS...
And to be clear. If I post a link to someone else saying that, that doesn't mean I'm saying it. That's like when I post what Trump says, that is me saying I agree with it. I post that shit to trigger people like you and it works. -
He didn’t say you said Trump was going to be impeached. He said you started a thread about it. Christ, can you fucking read?2001400ex said:
Where did I say he was going to be impeached? Read what I post. You have me confused with someone else.HoustonHusky said:I'm confused HondoFS. You seem to have time to poast new threads but you seem to have forgotten about your thread yesterday about how Trump was going to get impeached. Amazing too how you can afford to fly around and talk about TSA lines but you can't seem to afford to pitch in to pay the light bill around here.
Almost like you are a low IQ lying sack of shite or something...
And since you are a moron, I realize you don't understand that the WP saying the SC "signaled it might not" does not mean in any way, shape for form the definitive "isn't going to" and ruling against Trump you interpreted with your speed limit IQ (they could take the case and rule one way or another, they could not and send it to back to the lower court with guidance one way or another on things to interpret, etc...).
HondoFS...
And to be clear. If I post a link to someone else saying that, that doesn't mean I'm saying it. That's like when I post what Trump says, that is me saying I agree with it. I post that shit to trigger people like you and it works.
