Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
Curious for you to find that in the Constitution.
Just don't call him a fucking moron
Where is border security in the Constitution?
Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;
This took me 15 seconds to find. Be a better poaster.
No shit. Race is too fucktarded to support his comments.
Next question. Is this considered an invasion?
There are 20 to 40 million foreigners here illegally. I'd call that an invasion.
In both cases Democrats want to do something to fix the problem.
And in both cases, Republicans want to do something to fix the problem.
The issue is with how. And I'm sorry to tell you this. But a random 200 mile wall in Texas won't do anything to help the problem just like adding more guns to the mix won't help the problem.
Your buddy Acosta has already reported that the wall is highly effective.
In both cases Democrats want to do something to fix the problem.
And in both cases, Republicans want to do something to fix the problem.
The issue is with how. And I'm sorry to tell you this. But a random 200 mile wall in Texas won't do anything to help the problem just like adding more guns to the mix won't help the problem.
Your buddy Acosta has already reported that the wall is highly effective.
Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
What’s the 18th amendment?
I voted against it
Its since been repealed via the Constitution
So we can repeal amendments?
Of course
37 states and you can grab all the guns you want
Probably be as effective as 18 too
Unintended consequences
Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.
And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
What’s the 18th amendment?
I voted against it
Its since been repealed via the Constitution
So we can repeal amendments?
Of course
37 states and you can grab all the guns you want
Probably be as effective as 18 too
Unintended consequences
Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.
And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
Well you do need a wall
They work very effectively
I'm willing to consider an alternative but there isn't one
Just talk and nonsense
As wall is a big part of reform and will get illegals here on a path and deal with the whole issue
Chuck and Nancy won't even talk
Hondo and the gang have had weeks to come up with a rational argument against
Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
What’s the 18th amendment?
I voted against it
Its since been repealed via the Constitution
So we can repeal amendments?
Of course
37 states and you can grab all the guns you want
Probably be as effective as 18 too
Unintended consequences
Sure. My point is when I say “your guns for a wall” just replying “gun ownership is a constitutional right” is irrelevant. Your unwillingness to repeal the second amendment would be the problem.
And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
Well you do need a wall
They work very effectively
I'm willing to consider an alternative but there isn't one
Just talk and nonsense
As wall is a big part of reform and will get illegals here on a path and deal with the whole issue
Chuck and Nancy won't even talk
Hondo and the gang have had weeks to come up with a rational argument against
My reaction to this is “alright fuck it build the wall if you want to”. I think Trump will prevent you from winning though. When you burn all the bridges it becomes very difficult to get across.
Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
Curious for you to find that in the Constitution.
Just don't call him a fucking moron
Where is border security in the Constitution?
Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;
This took me 15 seconds to find. Be a better poaster.
No shit. Race is too fucktarded to support his comments.
Next question. Is this considered an invasion?
No more than Monica's blowie was considered a sex act.
Cool, let’s compromise. We’ll build a wall and ban guns. Done deal.
Border security is a constitutional task of the government. Gun ownership is a constitutional right.
You can have my answer now, Senator.
Curious for you to find that in the Constitution.
Just don't call him a fucking moron
Where is border security in the Constitution?
Article 4, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;
This took me 15 seconds to find. Be a better poaster.
No shit. Race is too fucktarded to support his comments.
Next question. Is this considered an invasion?
Ah, I see. You’re one of those faux intellectuals who’s mommy told them how smart and special they were, and you grew up with a false sense of superiority. I bet you feel you’re the smartest person in the room and can’t understand why no one will listen to you. Hint, it’s because you’re not.
I’m not playing your retard games. Race has it right...Fuck off.
Can we be pen pals? Old school. Send post cards and such.
Comments
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cnns-jim-acosta-mocked-for-accidently-proving-that-border-walls-work
Its since been repealed via the Constitution
Sincerely,
Anti wall, anti taking everyone's guns.
37 states and you can grab all the guns you want
Probably be as effective as 18 too
Unintended consequences
And I understand you can say both are already constitutional so you don’t have to do anything but building a wall is not a constitutional task required of the government. You don’t need a wall to defend the border. You still have to get there.
They work very effectively
I'm willing to consider an alternative but there isn't one
Just talk and nonsense
As wall is a big part of reform and will get illegals here on a path and deal with the whole issue
Chuck and Nancy won't even talk
Hondo and the gang have had weeks to come up with a rational argument against
40 million times.
BFFs are so played out.