Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Queery #3

Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
What would be the response from the left if legislation was proposed to eliminate all physical deterrents to entry at our southern border, recall all border patrol and redeploy them elsewhere, abolish ICE and give instant citizenship to all illegals currently in the U.S,? In short, remove all border deterrents and award citizenship to all criminals currently in our country.
(In order to deter the Village Idiot from attempting to hijack this, I will stipulate:
1. I have a simple mind.
2. I missed the point.
3. My reading comprehension is poor.)

Please discuss.
«1

Comments

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Blu82 said:

    What would be the response from the left if legislation was proposed to eliminate all physical deterrents to entry at our southern border, recall all border patrol and redeploy them elsewhere, abolish ICE and give instant citizenship to all illegals currently in the U.S,? In short, remove all border deterrents and award citizenship to all criminals currently in our country.
    (In order to deter the Village Idiot from attempting to hijack this, I will stipulate:
    1. I have a simple mind.
    2. I missed the point.
    3. My reading comprehension is poor.)

    Please discuss.

    Got it!
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    Then don't discuss it!
    Instead, find CD and get yourselves a room. The two of you can commiserate how you have each come to deal with living with an underdeveloped penis. Both of you want to swing a big dick here but, obviously, neither have anything to swing.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sic burn bro.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2019
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    Yep, you have no intelligent response to the OP. Shocking!
    The Village Idiot strikes again!
    We are all in awe of your intellect!

    Why did you require a list of legislators who would propose such legislation before you would discuss?

    Then, why did you follow that up with a refusal to discuss unless your parameters were met?
    Why not just respond to the question posed? No intelligent answer? Afraid of getting your ass handed to you again?

    Again, you clearly did not read the OP.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blu82 said:

    Yep, you have no intelligent response to the OP. Shocking!
    The Village Idiot strikes again!
    We are all in awe of your intellect!

    Why did you require a list of legislators who would propose such legislation before you would discuss?

    Then, why did you follow that up with a refusal to discuss unless your parameters were met?
    Why not just respond to the question posed? No intelligent answer? Afraid of getting your ass handed to you again?

    Again, you clearly did not read the OP.

    So you want to discuss something no one wants and will never happen. And then strut like I'm the dumb one. Cool story bro.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,570
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Yep, you have no intelligent response to the OP. Shocking!
    The Village Idiot strikes again!
    We are all in awe of your intellect!

    Why did you require a list of legislators who would propose such legislation before you would discuss?

    Then, why did you follow that up with a refusal to discuss unless your parameters were met?
    Why not just respond to the question posed? No intelligent answer? Afraid of getting your ass handed to you again?

    Again, you clearly did not read the OP.

    So you want to discuss something no one wants and will never happen. And then strut like I'm the dumb one. Cool story
    bro.
    First you said you would discuss it with conditions. Then you said you wouldn't discuss it at all. Which is it?
    Good Gawd you are stupid!
    Sorry, I can't deal with this level of stupidity.
    NEXT!!!!!!

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Yep, you have no intelligent response to the OP. Shocking!
    The Village Idiot strikes again!
    We are all in awe of your intellect!

    Why did you require a list of legislators who would propose such legislation before you would discuss?

    Then, why did you follow that up with a refusal to discuss unless your parameters were met?
    Why not just respond to the question posed? No intelligent answer? Afraid of getting your ass handed to you again?

    Again, you clearly did not read the OP.

    So you want to discuss something no one wants and will never happen. And then strut like I'm the dumb one. Cool story bro.

    Kinda like when you want to discuss that Jazime Barnes was possibly a victim of a black on black hate crime...
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
    Sound like I need reading comprehension for my simple mind. Got it!

    LOL...yeah you won’t discuss things that will never happen.... The hate crime narrative was full steam ahead when they thought the shooter was white..The hate crime train came to a screeching halt when the fact was the murderer was black. You can keep tilting at wind mills Don Quixote, it’s fun for all of us tho see you spinnning in the wind as usual.

    No let me get back to missing the point. OK!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
    What a lying piece of crap you are Hondo. You said you agreed with Sheila Jackson Lee who did call it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    Hondo stick his head up his ass, directly contradicts himself and then fucks strawman ass by attacking things no one said and then claims you've missed the "point."

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
    Sound like I need reading comprehension for my simple mind. Got it!

    LOL...yeah you won’t discuss things that will never happen.... The hate crime narrative was full steam ahead when they thought the shooter was white..The hate crime train came to a screeching halt when the fact was the murderer was black. You can keep tilting at wind mills Don Quixote, it’s fun for all of us tho see you spinnning in the wind as usual.

    No let me get back to missing the point. OK!
    DaBoner didn't read point 1.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
    What a lying piece of crap you are Hondo. You said you agreed with Sheila Jackson Lee who did call it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation.

    Such fag Bob didn't read what I said, I said I agreed with her point in what a hate crime is. Fuckstick.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    2001400ex said:

    I'll discuss. But first point to legislators that are calling for all that.

    Reading comprehension is not your strong point, obviously.
    That, and you didn't read most of the poast, obviously.
    What is the point of discussing something that'll never happen?
    It didn’t deter you from wanting to talk about jazmine Barnes second suspect could be white. And even if he ended up being black, it still could be a black on black hate crime.
    Mike still misses the point that about color of skin in relation to what a hate crime is. Shocking.
    I “missed the point”. OK! Must be that I have a simple mind.

    So when will hate crimes be filed here? I’m waiting for that wager...that you won’t make. Perhaps Jazmine was gay and these bad gang members hated the gays and wanted her dead? Or maybe she was a jew and they hated jews. Maybe they hate 7 years olds? Your moving of the goal post is legendary. You’re pathetic.
    Well the two dudes are going to jail. That being said, I never said it was a hate crime.

    I have made these points several times and you still cannot comprehend it. Last time sugar bear, I'll put it in a nice list for you.

    1) anyone who called it a hate crime prior to knowing the motivation is FS.

    2) if the shooter was white, doesn't mean it was a hate crime.

    3) if the shooter was black, doesn't mean it's not a hate crime.

    Now will you read for comprehension and shut the fuck up? You are acting like gay Bob here.
    Sound like I need reading comprehension for my simple mind. Got it!

    LOL...yeah you won’t discuss things that will never happen.... The hate crime narrative was full steam ahead when they thought the shooter was white..The hate crime train came to a screeching halt when the fact was the murderer was black. You can keep tilting at wind mills Don Quixote, it’s fun for all of us tho see you spinnning in the wind as usual.

    No let me get back to missing the point. OK!
    DaBoner didn't read point 1.
    Yes I did. And you coild have said that originally and not posted again in the whole thread. But you didn’t.
Sign In or Register to comment.