Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
Our current healthcare system will cost 34 trillion over the same time period. Now I’ll wait for you to claim you never said it cost 32 trillion.
Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
It's so radical that 73% of FOX NEWS VIEWERS think we should do it. Seriously. What part of that makes it radical?
Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
Our current healthcare system will cost 34 trillion over the same time period. Now I’ll wait for you to claim you never said it cost 32 trillion.
Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
It's so radical that 73% of FOX NEWS VIEWERS think we should do it. Seriously. What part of that makes it radical?
So if Fox News viewers support something it's not radical. Got it.
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do. A new Federal program that will destroy the private health insurance industry and cost $32 trillion isn't radical in the mind of a dipshit that didn't even know that Social Security existed in the 1950s.
Btw, whatever dollar amount is being projected now that it will cost, you can bank on it to cost more.
Too big a Kunt to answer the question I see. So your Kunt logic appears to be that if something is widely supported it can't be radical. A new program with a price tag of $32 Trillion seems pretty radical to me, but then again I'm not a Kunt.
It's so radical that 73% of FOX NEWS VIEWERS think we should do it. Seriously. What part of that makes it radical?
Hondo were these really Fox News viewers or were they just "technically" Fox News viewers?
Comments
I heard the left say that leaving Syria would ruin the mid east. And our Nobel Prez had 8 years.
How long are you going to fall for this one? The globalist establishment needs endless war
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do. A new Federal program that will destroy the private health insurance industry and cost $32 trillion isn't radical in the mind of a dipshit that didn't even know that Social Security existed in the 1950s.
Btw, whatever dollar amount is being projected now that it will cost, you can bank on it to cost more.