Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ocasio-Cortez advocates 82% tax rate for richest New Yorkers; compares herself to Lincoln, FDR

2»

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.

    We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.

    As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.



    Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.

    Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.
    Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.

    But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.

    Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).

    My point still stands.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:



    It's our spending that's completely fucking out of whack, not our lack of tax revenue.


    I knew some dumbfuck was going to post that. Congrats!!! You try to use that chart and say it's not a big deal. But there's a range of 6% on that chart. What number do you think 6% of GDP is? That's a big fucking number.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,875
    The whole tax rate thing is whatever ... and even she called for it as a graduated tax rate so whatever on that

    The thing that floored me more was freshman Congresswoman comparing herself to Lincoln and FDR ... that's laughable at this point
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,153 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2019
    How have no nudes of AOC leaked yet?!? That is unbelievable. You know they exist somewhere.

    Though it might be a good strategy to keep those under wraps until she runs for Senate or POTUS. Probably already bought, paid for and stored on HIlary's bathtub server.

  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    She should defiantly get the sex tape out there now. Play it out with a short written statement. Followup with tears for TV. Then, let it die till Senate time.

    In the future it will be "old news". pervs who missed it and search for it will see the Younger/Hotter version and go, huh. Proobably vote for her.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,790 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.

    We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.

    As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.



    Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.

    Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.
    Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.

    But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.

    Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).

    My point still stands.
    Technically


    What a putz
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.

    We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.

    As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s.



    Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.

    Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.
    Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.

    But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.

    Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).

    My point still stands.
    Technically


    What a putz
    Doesn't change my point. HTH
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    When I stick banana up my ass I smell roses. Now refute what I said Hondo. Your statement is pure Kunt logic. There's no need for me to refute it. It refutes itself due to sheer stupidity.

    We paid off the war bonds and had a surplus therefore people must have paid the top income tax rate. Logic only a Kunt could love. Couldn't be that we spent less, has to be on account of high tax rates.

    As a percentage of GDP Federal tax revenue is actually higher now then it was at any time during the 1950s



    Btw, Hondo why are you only talking about the top income tax rates? I thought you said you couldn't talk about income taxes without talking about payroll taxes.

    Now you are just being fucktarded. There was no SS and Medicare in the late 50s. Yes federal receipts in total, which includes Corporate and payroll taxes, was roughly 17% of GDP then and in that ballpark now. But break it down to income taxes. It is funny now you care about other taxes. Dumbass.
    Lets go of the side of the kiddie pool and sinks like a fucking rock. There was no Social Security in the 1950s? Stick to dick sucking Hondo, it's your only real area of expertise. And of course what would a Hondo post be without a blatant lie. Federal tax revenue as a percentage of GDP is actually higher now Hondo you fucking lying piece of shit.

    But given the fact that you're a fucking moron who thinks there were no Social Security taxes in the 1950s I'll allow you to cop to just being a dumbfuck if you like Hondo.

    Technically there was SS in the 50s, that's my bad. But it was 2%, 2.5% in 59. Not 7.65% (Including Medicare which was in the 60s).

    My point still stands.
    "Technically" there was Social Security in the 1950s? What a fucking worthless lying Kunt you are Hondo. The existence of Social Security in the 1950s isn't just a point of semantics or a technicality you fucking dipshit.

    The rest of post is just more gibberish to cover the fact that you had your head up your ass.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:



    It's our spending that's completely fucking out of whack, not our lack of tax revenue.


    I knew some dumbfuck was going to post that. Congrats!!! You try to use that chart and say it's not a big deal. But there's a range of 6% on that chart. What number do you think 6% of GDP is? That's a big fucking number.
    I didn't use the chart to say it wasn't a big deal you lying worthless piece of shit. I used the chart to refute your head up the ass claim that we were able to pay off war debt and run a surplus because our taxes were so much higher back in the 1950s. You remember the 1950s don't you Hondo? Back before we had Social Security, right moron.

    Our taxes as a percentage of GDP are higher now then they were then Hondo. I await your next strawman ass fuck and gibberish response.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    edited January 2019
    The "point" that you're a dipshit? Nothing changes that Hondo. Hondo, are you picking up on a pattern here? Every time you move outside of your little cut and paste world and your canned comments you make a complete ass out of yourself.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,153 Standard Supporter

    She should defiantly get the sex tape out there now. Play it out with a short written statement. Followup with tears for TV. Then, let it die till Senate time.

    In the future it will be "old news". pervs who missed it and search for it will see the Younger/Hotter version and go, huh. Proobably vote for her.

    The Throbber is willing to take one for the team. 50 shades of gray style with a mask and shit.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203

    She should defiantly get the sex tape out there now. Play it out with a short written statement. Followup with tears for TV. Then, let it die till Senate time.

    In the future it will be "old news". pervs who missed it and search for it will see the Younger/Hotter version and go, huh. Proobably vote for her.

    The Throbber is willing to take one for the team. 50 shades of gray style with a mask and shit.

    She was very attractive in that dancing video.
  • ZoneUWZoneUW Member Posts: 794

    She should defiantly get the sex tape out there now. Play it out with a short written statement. Followup with tears for TV. Then, let it die till Senate time.

    In the future it will be "old news". pervs who missed it and search for it will see the Younger/Hotter version and go, huh. Proobably vote for her.

    The Throbber is willing to take one for the team. 50 shades of gray style with a mask and shit.

    I'll go in your place
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,487 Founders Club
Sign In or Register to comment.