Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Queery #2

24

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PurpleJ said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.

    And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
    Great sanctimony as always.

    Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,212 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.

    And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
    Great sanctimony as always.

    Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
    Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    We need to build 'The Wall'. I want to see what other ineffective schemes can be dialed up when that one doesn't work.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.

    And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
    Great sanctimony as always.

    Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
    Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!
    I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.

    Could you be any more self righteous?
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    No, the oil that powers your computer in the school library.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,212 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    Comparing border security to slavery is a good way to sum up modern Democrats.

    And then you argue for states rights. Sounds like you support slavery after all.
    Great sanctimony as always.

    Why do you hate Mississippi’s right to be free of liberal regulation and taxation? You sound like a typical big government fascist.
    Never said I didn't. Maybe you should learn to read. WTGWT. Mississippi!!!
    I support local choice and self determination. Not surprised you don’t.

    Could you be any more self righteous?
    I'm not self righteous. The Lord is my salvation. God bless!
  • Blu82Blu82 Member Posts: 1,568
    Gwad said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
    OK, name the subsidies.
    Please be specific.
    I'll wait.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blu82 said:

    Gwad said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
    OK, name the subsidies.
    Please be specific.
    I'll wait.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2017/10/6/16428458/us-energy-coal-oil-subsidies
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Blu82 said:

    Gwad said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
    OK, name the subsidies.
    Please be specific.
    I'll wait.
    If this is an attempt to denote a non existence of subsidizing policies that allow oil companies to operate. I would rather you get to your point than waste time posing questions you could easily find the answers to yourself.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Is this meant to be some sort of gotcha moment?

    Did you just learn that the United States encourages energy development to run this country?
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    edited January 2019
    The profits are privatized. It also ties into a larger theme I see on here about the nature of socialism.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Do you enjoy mobility? Lights? TV?
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Exactly as I suspected.

    Thanks for the confirmation
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,072
    edited January 2019
    Gwad said:

    We need to build 'The Wall'. I want to see what other ineffective schemes can be dialed up when that one doesn't work.

    Since you're a liberal I already know that you love policies that don't work. Got to love how well that welfare state has worked out.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,072
    Gwad said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
    Liberals love the myth about oil company "subsides." Most of these "subsides" are the same form of corporate deductions that can be taken advantage of by every business.



    https://www.forbes.com/sites/drillinginfo/2016/02/22/debunking-myths-about-federal-oil-gas-subsidies/#6c7443126e1c
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,072
    2001400ex said:

    Blu82 said:

    Gwad said:

    Blu82 said:

    I support legislation that shuts down the federal government permanently. It’s a massive fucking waste. States are sovereign and should be responsible for managing their own social and political affairs. No more transfers of California wealth and prosperity to ignorant freeloaders who are so destitute and uncompetitive that they demand tariffs, labor restrictions and generalized economic protectionism. Shut it down. End the gravy train and handouts to trumptards.

    I would be all in favor of leaving just the California portion of the border unprotected and wall off the entire state. That would save us all a bunch of money, increase the safety of the rest of the country and put a big dent into drugs coming into our country.
    Let California be the safe harbor foe all illegals. Since they already want to be a sanctuary state let them put their resources where their socialist mouths are. FREE SHIT FOR EVERYBODY THAT WANTS IN! What a utopia.
    California makes you angry!

    Somewhere in your lunacy, however, is a thread of agreement. You won’t understand it, at all, but it is still worth mentioning and you can nod your head obliviously in agreement.

    The point of agreement is: “The wall” in 2019 is a far less destructive totem as slavery in 1860, but essentially serves the same purpose. It illustrates the intractable division — economic, social, and political— that defines today’s US. So, in other words, the US social contract is once again broken.

    States should be free to go their own way. Think how happy that would make Mississippi! California would be way better off.
    How happy will Kalifornians be when they learn they have to pay Donald Trumps government for the offshore oil?
    The oil that soaks up billions of dollars in subsidies (corporate socialism)?
    OK, name the subsidies.
    Please be specific.
    I'll wait.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/energy-and-environment/2017/10/6/16428458/us-energy-coal-oil-subsidies
    Why can't you name them for us Mr. Cut and Paste? Btw, for a guy who loves to attack the source of others you sure post a lot Vox and Think Progress Kunt.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,072
    Hey Hondo, when talking about how much the top 1% pays in income taxes you claimed it was dishonest to not list the amounts paid by everyone in Social Security and Medicare taxes. How come you don't list the amount of taxes paid by the oil industry and compare it to these so called "subsidies?"

    Using your Kunt standard, shouldn't you also be citing the amount of taxes that are paid by the oil industry?
Sign In or Register to comment.