Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mad Dawg Sells Couch

135

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209
    SFGbob said:

    This is one of those issue that if Obama had supported it every single liberal here would now be supporting it. We're not accomplishing anything in Afghanistan other than spending billions on a shit hole country that will fall back into the hands of the Taliban as soon as we leave. Training up the Afghani army is a fucking joke and a waste of our money and our troops.

    Brilliant. And you did that with your cock in your mouth. You're a talented little faggot aren't you?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209

    I miss having a war hero like Obama in the white house


  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,926 Founders Club
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    wgaf about isis?

    Syria has always been a proxy war with Russia over a natural gas pipeline which would break Russia's monopoly selling natural gas to Europe.

    Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.




  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    wgaf about isis?

    Syria has always been a proxy war with Russia over a natural gas pipeline which would break Russia's monopoly selling natural gas to Europe.

    Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.




    The generals in the military disagree with you.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    Yes, she is saying we need to stay in Syria.

    If Obama were withdrawing she wouldn’t say a thing.
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4769175/minority-leader-pelosi-calls-syria-troop-withdrawal-decision-dangerous
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,926 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    wgaf about isis?

    Syria has always been a proxy war with Russia over a natural gas pipeline which would break Russia's monopoly selling natural gas to Europe.

    Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.




    The generals in the military disagree with you.
    #aclockworkshill right on tim.


    Bridge. Aurora. Peter Pan.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter
    Odd that the posters here deriding Trump for pulling out of Syria crying "but ISIS!" are the same ones that supported Obama who created and armed ISIS.

    FMFYFE
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,254 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited December 2018
    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Sledog said:

    Odd that the posters here deriding Trump for pulling out of Syria crying "but ISIS!" are the same ones that supported Obama who created and armed ISIS.

    FMFYFE




  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    Dude61 said:

    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.

    Yes. Because what else is a Trump sycophant supposed to say?

    To be fair, I'm sure your view of the resignation letter was at least partially blocked by Trump's belly button, so maybe you didn't have the best view.



  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209
    edited December 2018
    Dude61 said:

    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.

    What the fuck was that gibberish?
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,254 Swaye's Wigwam

    Dude61 said:

    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.

    What the fuck was that gibberish?
    I don't expect a coog to understand basic engrish.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209
    Dude61 said:

    Dude61 said:

    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.

    What the fuck was that gibberish?
    I don't expect a coog to understand basic engrish.
    Maybe you're right; I guess basic Engrish isn't being going for pretend lawyering.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Dude61 said:

    Mattis was incapable of acknowledging the mindless self-destructive nature of endless war in the middle-east that candidate-Trump rightly called stupid. Even in his resignation letter Mattis peddled the usual cant about the nation's indespensible aggression being going for the world.

    Mattis was totally unimaginative.

    Make you your fucking minds.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,209
    Sledog said:

    Odd that the posters here deriding Trump for pulling out of Syria crying "but ISIS!" are the same ones that supported Obama who created and armed ISIS.

    FMFYFE

    Odd?
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    wgaf about isis?

    Syria has always been a proxy war with Russia over a natural gas pipeline which would break Russia's monopoly selling natural gas to Europe.

    Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.




    The generals in the military disagree with you.
    Which generals?

    Whose military?

    What specifically do they disagree with?
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Sledog thinks that presidents create ideas and do things. Proof that innocence is not lost.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    edited December 2018

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    dhdawg said:

    It’s a strange time when liberals are for more war in the Middle East.

    Or maybe they just want the opposite of what trump wants regardless if they were for or against it in the past.

    Now - Russia!
    Then - The 80’s called and wants it’s foreign policy back.

    Now - Boarder walls and security are racist!
    Then - We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.

    Now - Pulling out of Syria will allow Russia and Iran to dictate the post war outcome!
    Then - McCain said he could see troops in Iraq for 100 years, I want them home in 60 days!


    Make you your fucking minds.

    please point me to all the examples of liberals advocating for war in the middle east.
    and by liberals I do not mean wall street journal contributors, former bush speech writers and cia hacks.
    Huh? If this was Obama’s decision he’d be getting his cock sucked by Pelosi. “What a great day to finally bring our troops home and end this illegal and immoral war”

    Instead:

    https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/121918-3/
    that kind of mealy mouthed garbage is exactly what I expect from Pelosi, but nothing in that statement advocates for more war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.
    Not advocating ending war = advocating war.

    She wants to stay in Syria for no other reason that trump wants to leave. Simple fact.
    What in that statement said "we need to stay in Syria."
    I read that as "Trump is wrongfully declaring victory against isis" (who cares) and there needs to be oversight and questions answered about how and why he is withdrawing.
    wgaf about isis?

    Syria has always been a proxy war with Russia over a natural gas pipeline which would break Russia's monopoly selling natural gas to Europe.

    Simple fact. Case closed. End of discussion.




    The generals in the military disagree with you.
    Which generals?

    Whose military?

    What specifically do they disagree with?
    The Sec of Defense of our military disagrees, you fucking retarded cunt.

    Is Trump's belly button blocking your view of what's been going on, fluffer?
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited December 2018
    Patrick Shanahan, US Def Sec supports Trumps action on Syria.

    Why are you for US Troops fighting proxy Wars on Foreign soil?

    What is the direct strategic value to the United States by staying in Syria.

    What is our mission there?
Sign In or Register to comment.