When Tucker talks shit about Trump. The conservatives run and hide. HTH
Kind of like when you're asked to quote where I said anything about voter ID or when you're asked to tell us why you cited a case that was overturned as evidence that Voter ID = a poll tax or where I said anything about owning land as a requirement to vote.
When Tucker talks shit about Trump. The conservatives run and hide. HTH
Tucker is is saying what I said in advance of the mid terms.
Hope this helps but it won't
Trump made the election about him and he failed to move the pieces of shit in his own party to replace Obamacare and build the wall. He gets the blame. He would have taken the credit
Only morons think the establishment is one party or the other. Its the establishment. He got elected to take them on
We're not like you Obama cocksuckers trying to take credit for the things he has done. Two years in two big things remain undone
Win a big game.
That's true. I remember. And he's right.
Creepy's take on Trump, as far I can tell from a distance, is that the things Kelly has been rumored as saying, and that Tillerson has said, is that he's not a detail guy (doesn't like to read, doesn't like to study, doesn't like to dig in), and likes to go too much on the surface with "this is what I think" and shoots from the hip too much.
Whether his aims are good or not is something that has been debated here ad nauseam; but assuming his agenda was the right agenda, I think where even his most ardent supporters can find fault with him is in execution. He has played the "outrageous will say anything," "tells it like it is," "he has big balls," outsider bit to its conclusion. He's not new anymore.
Maybe there are too many 'establishment Republicans' in his way and it's not possible. The alternative theory is that he could be a little more crafty. I don't really know and won't pretend to be a DC insider.
Comments
Take a breath man.
Creepy's take on Trump, as far I can tell from a distance, is that the things Kelly has been rumored as saying, and that Tillerson has said, is that he's not a detail guy (doesn't like to read, doesn't like to study, doesn't like to dig in), and likes to go too much on the surface with "this is what I think" and shoots from the hip too much.
Whether his aims are good or not is something that has been debated here ad nauseam; but assuming his agenda was the right agenda, I think where even his most ardent supporters can find fault with him is in execution. He has played the "outrageous will say anything," "tells it like it is," "he has big balls," outsider bit to its conclusion. He's not new anymore.
Maybe there are too many 'establishment Republicans' in his way and it's not possible. The alternative theory is that he could be a little more crafty. I don't really know and won't pretend to be a DC insider.