Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    He's just an anti Zionist not an anti Semite.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    The “Destruction of Israel”

    Israel has killed the two-state solution by building more and more settlements in the West Bank and the hundreds of thousands now living there will never leave. Which leaves the best outcome for the Palestinians being a single secular democratic state with guaranteed rights.

    It’s only the “destruction of Israel” if you believe that it can only exist as an expliticly Jewish state. Which currently means Israel will move further down the road to apartheid.

    But recognizing and advocating this is somehow “anti-semitism”.
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    I know you don’t actually care about the substance of what this guy said related to the Israeli-Palestinian issue because your sole motive for posting this to scream “Look anti-semitism on the left!” Because it’s inconvenient to your side that right-wing neo-nazis are shooting up synagogues because of the caravan.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    No need to scream "look anti-Semitism on the left." If you find anti-Semitism in the US today it's almost always on the left.

    Shocking that Hill is pals with Farrakhan.



  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club

    The “Destruction of Israel”

    Israel has killed the two-state solution by building more and more settlements in the West Bank and the hundreds of thousands now living there will never leave. Which leaves the best outcome for the Palestinians being a single secular democratic state with guaranteed rights.

    It’s only the “destruction of Israel” if you believe that it can only exist as an expliticly Jewish state. Which currently means Israel will move further down the road to apartheid.

    But recognizing and advocating this is somehow “anti-semitism”.


    Which side has sat down to negotiate a two state solution since the 80's and which side says the solution is to push the Jews into the sea?

    Which side has built a prosperous democracy and which side has squandered trillions of dollars to build a shit hole they can strap TNT on their kids from?

    Which country allows Arabs and Palis to vote and be citizens in the Mid East? Its not apartheid, its not a one state, and your an anti Semite when you post anti Semitic propaganda like this

    HTH
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,298 Standard Supporter
    Which right wing Nazis are on FOX? Which ones have inspired a mob to kill Jews? Have an open invitation to the White House? Another leftard weak lame ass moral equivalency argument
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937

    The “Destruction of Israel”

    Israel has killed the two-state solution by building more and more settlements in the West Bank and the hundreds of thousands now living there will never leave. Which leaves the best outcome for the Palestinians being a single secular democratic state with guaranteed rights.

    It’s only the “destruction of Israel” if you believe that it can only exist as an expliticly Jewish state. Which currently means Israel will move further down the road to apartheid.

    But recognizing and advocating this is somehow “anti-semitism”.


    Which side has sat down to negotiate a two state solution since the 80's and which side says the solution is to push the Jews into the sea?

    Which side has built a prosperous democracy and which side has squandered trillions of dollars to build a shit hole they can strap TNT on their kids from?

    Which country allows Arabs and Palis to vote and be citizens in the Mid East? Its not apartheid, its not a one state, and your an anti Semite when you post anti Semitic propaganda like this

    HTH
    Which side used Oslo to undermine the new authority and continue settlement expansion that effecively killed the two state solution?

    Which side shot 50+ unarmed protestors a few months ago? Or enacted a racist nation-state law that made Druze and Arabs lesser status just this past summer. Or only recognizes the more Orthodox sects as authentically Jewish. In their official statement Israel didn’t call the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting an anti-semitic attack because they don’ actually recognize Conservative Judaism (which that synagogue was).

    You’re the only one here pushing Likud propaganda. Tell me how many times you’ve been to Israel in your lifetime? Or if everything you know comes from conservative US media that demonizes PalestinIans any chance it gets and only amplifies the most right-wing Zionist voices in Israel and the west. Or the side that calls those chanting “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville “very fine people”.

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,203
    Which side shot 50+ unarmed protestors a few months ago?

    Yes, yes the "unarmed protesters" that were throwing rocks and grenades.

    The deaths occurred during Friday protests, which often turn violent, along the fence separating Israel and the Gaza Strip.

    The ministry identified the victims as Ahmed Ibrahim Al-Taweel,27; Mohamed Abdelhafez Ismail, 29; Tamer Riad Armaneh, 27; Afifi Mahmoud Afifi, 32; Ahmed Abdullah Abu Naim, 17; Abdullah Suleiman Al-Daghma, 25; and Mohamed Esam Abas, 21.

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said about 15,000 Palestinians gathered along fence.

    "The rioters are burning tires and are hurling rocks, explosive devices, firebombs and grenades at IDF troops and the security fence," according to an IDF statement.
    In response, the IDF said, soldiers used riot dispersal means and live fire in accordance with standard operating procedures.

    CNN crews witnessed Palestinians throwing grenades and burning tires, and burning the border fence -- with Israeli forces responding with tear gas, live fire and a water cannon.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club

    The “Destruction of Israel”

    Israel has killed the two-state solution by building more and more settlements in the West Bank and the hundreds of thousands now living there will never leave. Which leaves the best outcome for the Palestinians being a single secular democratic state with guaranteed rights.

    It’s only the “destruction of Israel” if you believe that it can only exist as an expliticly Jewish state. Which currently means Israel will move further down the road to apartheid.

    But recognizing and advocating this is somehow “anti-semitism”.


    Which side has sat down to negotiate a two state solution since the 80's and which side says the solution is to push the Jews into the sea?

    Which side has built a prosperous democracy and which side has squandered trillions of dollars to build a shit hole they can strap TNT on their kids from?

    Which country allows Arabs and Palis to vote and be citizens in the Mid East? Its not apartheid, its not a one state, and your an anti Semite when you post anti Semitic propaganda like this

    HTH
    Which side used Oslo to undermine the new authority and continue settlement expansion that effecively killed the two state solution?

    Which side shot 50+ unarmed protestors a few months ago? Or enacted a racist nation-state law that made Druze and Arabs lesser status just this past summer. Or only recognizes the more Orthodox sects as authentically Jewish. In their official statement Israel didn’t call the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting an anti-semitic attack because they don’ actually recognize Conservative Judaism (which that synagogue was).

    You’re the only one here pushing Likud propaganda. Tell me how many times you’ve been to Israel in your lifetime? Or if everything you know comes from conservative US media that demonizes PalestinIans any chance it gets and only amplifies the most right-wing Zionist voices in Israel and the west. Or the side that calls those chanting “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville “very fine people”.

    The media doesn't need to demonize Palestinians. They do fine all by themselves. We have a 70 year laboratory of results among the two countries. One is a death culture of failure, the other is a solid ally and functioning country where Palis can be citizens and vote and stuff.

    Hard call but I know who I am going for. I've been an observer since Abraham knocked up Haggar. I don't need the media

    You have a penchant for anti Semitic propaganda which is rampant in the Mid East and you support the people who supported the REAL Nazis. Nice company you keep. A couple hundred inbreeds in Virginia are not germane to the conversation
  • HardlyClothedHardlyClothed Member Posts: 937
    “Solid ally”

    Right like when they told us invading Iraq would be great for the region.

    “Palis can be citizens and vote and stuff”

    Wow those things really lessen the discrimination and abject living conditions forced upon them!

    “You support the people who supported the real Nazis”

    It sure has been fun watching Bibi cozy up to Orban in Hungary who has spent his presidency whitewhashing Hungarian complicity in the holocaust!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    Those are pretty weak replies quite honestly

    The only folks forcing shitty living conditions on the Palis are the Palis

    Whitewashing Hungarian complicity in the Nazis your pals supported while they killed 6 million Jews

    The horror
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,839 Standard Supporter

    The “Destruction of Israel”

    Israel has killed the two-state solution by building more and more settlements in the West Bank and the hundreds of thousands now living there will never leave. Which leaves the best outcome for the Palestinians being a single secular democratic state with guaranteed rights.

    It’s only the “destruction of Israel” if you believe that it can only exist as an expliticly Jewish state. Which currently means Israel will move further down the road to apartheid.

    But recognizing and advocating this is somehow “anti-semitism”.

    The best outcome for the Palestinians was doing the deal in '47. They refused because they don't want any Jews anywhere. They can kiss off.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    I used to enjoy Hill on Red Eye back in the day. Could count on sexual tension if he & Ann Coulter were on the panel.
Sign In or Register to comment.