Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trigger warning

13»

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    Obama and Holder are calling for nonpartisan state commissions to handle redistricting. They are advocating for an end to partisan gerrymandering. Rove is clearly not doing that. He's deliberately trying to muddy the waters by making PR arguments, which don't apply in plurality voting systems.

    Both sides not equally bad.

    For fucks sake


  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,033
    Michael died the way he lived, miserable. Using the "I think everyone else is dirty so it's okay if I'm dirty too" excuse is no way to go through life
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    We're not going to agree on the altruistic nature of Obama wanting democrats in charge of redistricting to be non partisan and fair


    No need for 12 pages to get there

    Never said it's ok.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Dems won house by 8.8 million votes. Can't wait to hear Damoans hawt take on how there's more people in California and New York than Idaho and Wyoming.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-smash-watergate-record-house-popular-vote-midterms-n940116

    Oh for fuck sakes. Are you that dumb? 1) The “popular vote” doesn’t matter, ever. And even less when looking at congressional and senate races as an aggreatge. And 2) yes It matters that millions of people in California and New York overwhelming vote democrat in huge numbers. If the people in a low population state voted 100% republican, they still would have millions less votes than 51% of the people in a high population state voting democrat. They fact you think that stat matters shows what a dipfuck you are.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    GOP was just obliterated in California. In the most populous state that is by itself the 5th largest economy in the world, the party of trump ends up with 8 house seats out of 53. They don’t even try to compete anymore, even as enclaves of 50+ year old high school educated white nationalists grow ever smaller, and retreat into the backwaters of Riverside county, San Bernardino County, the Central Valley and east contra costa.

    They could win on a platform of lower taxes, fiscal reform and debt reduction. Instead they scapegoat Mexicans and thump on their bibles. Why don’t republicans run on an agenda that could win votes in California? So tone deaf. This is why you have Nancy Pelosi as speaker.

    Nancy pelosi as speaker is a gift for the gop
    It doesn't matter who the Democrats choose, your news source will vilify them. And you'll believe it and your ignorance will be bliss.
    I hope Beto is the new speaker. He’s rich, cool and 4-0.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Dems won house by 8.8 million votes. Can't wait to hear Damoans hawt take on how there's more people in California and New York than Idaho and Wyoming.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-smash-watergate-record-house-popular-vote-midterms-n940116

    Oh for fuck sakes. Are you that dumb? 1) The “popular vote” doesn’t matter, ever. And even less when looking at congressional and senate races as an aggreatge. And 2) yes It matters that millions of people in California and New York overwhelming vote democrat in huge numbers. If the people in a low population state voted 100% republican, they still would have millions less votes than 51% of the people in a high population state voting democrat. They fact you think that stat matters shows what a dipfuck you are.
    You have a great point on the Senate. And have a point with the electoral college for president where most states the delegates are all or none. But the house is proportioned by population and each district in each state stands on its own. So yes the vote count matters.

    That being said, here is the percentage.... 53.3% to 45.0%. And the count is over 9 million now.

    I thought you at one time said I didn't have a basic knowledge of civics.... You should take a class yourself.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,499 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Obama and Holder are calling for nonpartisan state commissions to handle redistricting. They are advocating for an end to partisan gerrymandering. Rove is clearly not doing that. He's deliberately trying to muddy the waters by making PR arguments, which don't apply in plurality voting systems.

    Both sides not equally bad.

    Contradiction in terms
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dems won house by 8.8 million votes. Can't wait to hear Damoans hawt take on how there's more people in California and New York than Idaho and Wyoming.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-smash-watergate-record-house-popular-vote-midterms-n940116

    Oh for fuck sakes. Are you that dumb? 1) The “popular vote” doesn’t matter, ever. And even less when looking at congressional and senate races as an aggreatge. And 2) yes It matters that millions of people in California and New York overwhelming vote democrat in huge numbers. If the people in a low population state voted 100% republican, they still would have millions less votes than 51% of the people in a high population state voting democrat. They fact you think that stat matters shows what a dipfuck you are.
    You have a great point on the Senate. And have a point with the electoral college for president where most states the delegates are all or none. But the house is proportioned by population and each district in each state stands on its own. So yes the vote count matters.

    That being said, here is the percentage.... 53.3% to 45.0%. And the count is over 9 million now.

    I thought you at one time said I didn't have a basic knowledge of civics.... You should take a class yourself.
    Again, it’s a stat that means nothing, yet you think it’s some kind of fucking major win. Yeah the dems won seats. Yeah, places with larger populations for dem. Drumpf (lol) won the election and lost the popular vote. The electoral system is working as designed. When are you taking the civics class ? Dumb shit.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dems won house by 8.8 million votes. Can't wait to hear Damoans hawt take on how there's more people in California and New York than Idaho and Wyoming.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-smash-watergate-record-house-popular-vote-midterms-n940116

    Oh for fuck sakes. Are you that dumb? 1) The “popular vote” doesn’t matter, ever. And even less when looking at congressional and senate races as an aggreatge. And 2) yes It matters that millions of people in California and New York overwhelming vote democrat in huge numbers. If the people in a low population state voted 100% republican, they still would have millions less votes than 51% of the people in a high population state voting democrat. They fact you think that stat matters shows what a dipfuck you are.
    You have a great point on the Senate. And have a point with the electoral college for president where most states the delegates are all or none. But the house is proportioned by population and each district in each state stands on its own. So yes the vote count matters.

    That being said, here is the percentage.... 53.3% to 45.0%. And the count is over 9 million now.

    I thought you at one time said I didn't have a basic knowledge of civics.... You should take a class yourself.
    Again, it’s a stat that means nothing, yet you think it’s some kind of fucking major win. Yeah the dems won seats. Yeah, places with larger populations for dem. Drumpf (lol) won the election and lost the popular vote. The electoral system is working as designed. When are you taking the civics class ? Dumb shit.
    No I don't think it's a fucking major win. I say it to trigger conservative dicksuckers such as you. Looks like it worked.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,924 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Dems won house by 8.8 million votes. Can't wait to hear Damoans hawt take on how there's more people in California and New York than Idaho and Wyoming.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/democrats-smash-watergate-record-house-popular-vote-midterms-n940116

    Oh for fuck sakes. Are you that dumb? 1) The “popular vote” doesn’t matter, ever. And even less when looking at congressional and senate races as an aggreatge. And 2) yes It matters that millions of people in California and New York overwhelming vote democrat in huge numbers. If the people in a low population state voted 100% republican, they still would have millions less votes than 51% of the people in a high population state voting democrat. They fact you think that stat matters shows what a dipfuck you are.
    You have a great point on the Senate. And have a point with the electoral college for president where most states the delegates are all or none. But the house is proportioned by population and each district in each state stands on its own. So yes the vote count matters.

    That being said, here is the percentage.... 53.3% to 45.0%. And the count is over 9 million now.

    I thought you at one time said I didn't have a basic knowledge of civics.... You should take a class yourself.
    Again, it’s a stat that means nothing, yet you think it’s some kind of fucking major win. Yeah the dems won seats. Yeah, places with larger populations for dem. Drumpf (lol) won the election and lost the popular vote. The electoral system is working as designed. When are you taking the civics class ? Dumb shit.
    No I don't think it's a fucking major win. I say it to trigger conservative dicksuckers such as you. Looks like it worked.
    Worthless oxygen thief heard from.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,033

    BearsWiin said:

    Obama and Holder are calling for nonpartisan state commissions to handle redistricting. They are advocating for an end to partisan gerrymandering. Rove is clearly not doing that. He's deliberately trying to muddy the waters by making PR arguments, which don't apply in plurality voting systems.

    Both sides not equally bad.

    Contradiction in terms
    Only if you lack the vision to free yourself from partisan shackles. People do it all the time, and you can too
Sign In or Register to comment.