Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hunter Bryant eligibility pole

2»

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,169
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?

    You sit him against Oregon State not in important games. I wish they had but that ship sailed.

    You get the rust off against oregon state so you win down the stretch. As has been said numerous times, he won't be exhausting his eligibility.
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,110
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    Mad_Son said:

    You sit him against Oregon State not in important games. I wish they had but that ship sailed.

    You get the rust off against oregon state so you win down the stretch. As has been said numerous times, he won't be exhausting his eligibility.
    That's fine but then they shouldn't have played him for those few snaps against Stanford.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,169
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?

    Mad_Son said:

    You sit him against Oregon State not in important games. I wish they had but that ship sailed.

    You get the rust off against oregon state so you win down the stretch. As has been said numerous times, he won't be exhausting his eligibility.
    That's fine but then they shouldn't have played him for those few snaps against Stanford.
    That's fair criticism if there is a world where he stays to full tenure
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,911 Swaye's Wigwam
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?

    This again? So fucking stupid. He is 100% gone to the NFL after next season! Get that through your fucking head! The coaches know this and do not give a fuck about red shirting him at all. We need him to win the next two games. Need to get the most out of him while we got him. He's fucking playing in both games.

    Fucking this. If he’s healthy and has a great year next year, he’s probably gone anyway. Plus, there’s no fucking way he’s staying 3 more years. Even if he did redshirt and stayed that long, it would be because he kept getting hurt, and WWWHA.
  • ExtraChrisBExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,811
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    Assuming players are going pro early is reckless and playing him against both Stanford and Oregon State was dumb.

    You would think given Pete's reputation of being insanely detail oriented would lead to better roster management, but it hasn't. You would also think a well coached team would have solid at worst special teams; we don't. It's hard.
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,546 Founders Club
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?

    Assuming players are going pro early is reckless and playing him against both Stanford and Oregon State was dumb.

    You would think given Pete's reputation of being insanely detail oriented would lead to better roster management, but it hasn't. You would also think a well coached team would have solid at worst special teams; we don't. It's hard.

    Do you prefer him leaving as a true Junior or redshirt sophomore?
  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    Play him, win the Rose Bowl, reap the benefits
  • The_UndertakerThe_Undertaker Member Posts: 521
    edited November 2018
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    This is a no brainer. The goal is to win titles. The coaches are here to win games, titles, otherwise they get fired.
    Your best receiver is back, healthy, and you are about to play for the conference trophy and maybe a Rose bowl. Of course you play him. Regardless of if he declares for the NFL early, what if he breaks his leg against Portland State in September next year? What did you accomplish by not playing him? What if he stays healthy but the team goes 6-6 because something else happens. When you can win today you dont postpone to tomorow.
  • ExtraChrisBExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,811
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    Doogles said:

    Assuming players are going pro early is reckless and playing him against both Stanford and Oregon State was dumb.

    You would think given Pete's reputation of being insanely detail oriented would lead to better roster management, but it hasn't. You would also think a well coached team would have solid at worst special teams; we don't. It's hard.

    Do you prefer him leaving as a true Junior or redshirt sophomore?
    Redshirt sophomore if the difference is a few snaps against Stanford or playing half the game against the worst power 5 team in the country.
  • JoeyJoey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,564 Founders Club
    ...play him in both the P12CG and bowl game, and sacrifice a year of eligibility?
    He can still leave after next year so doesn't matter
Sign In or Register to comment.