Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

WSJ: Trump in trouble

no_uh
no_uh Member Posts: 776
Or maybe not. Those pesky campaign finance laws... Not sure the majority of public will care, not sure I do.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-played-central-role-in-hush-payoffs-to-stormy-daniels-and-karen-mcdougal-1541786601?mod=hp_lead_pos1
«1

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Maybe the 6th time this story is thrown out there will be the charm

    Wsj is conservative and generally pro Trump.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,341 Founders Club
    Who gives a fuck?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Who gives a fuck?

    I do. Clearly you do as well. You sound angry.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    2001400ex said:

    Who gives a fuck?

    I do. Clearly you do as well. You sound angry.
    of course you would...
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Maybe the 6th time this story is thrown out there will be the charm

    This one has a long shelf life and will constantly be in the rotation.

    He denies it.
    He falls back on his nda (“it will ruin her financially.”)
    He insults her back.
    The affair occurred while the third male offspring he sired with the third lady was an infant.

    This saga is great entertainment. Family values, MAGA, and so on..,
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,341 Founders Club

    Maybe the 6th time this story is thrown out there will be the charm

    This one has a long shelf life and will constantly be in the rotation.

    He denies it.
    He falls back on his nda (“it will ruin her financially.”)
    He insults her back.
    The affair occurred while the third male offspring he sired with the third lady was an infant.

    This saga is great entertainment. Family values, MAGA, and so on..,
    "She has to pay me now!"

    Great tweet, really a tremendous tweet, lots of people say what a great tweet that was
  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 776
    So $150,000 out of $1,000,000,000 spent on the campaign was improper. That's de minimis, and we'd all like to see what a similar investigation would reveal of any other campaign because we know it's politics, and there are plenty of shady transactions across the board and party lines. Meanwhile, Russia and Saudi gov'ts (among others) are offing dissenting reporters.