Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Impeachment Official Game thread

145791017

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,220
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited July 2019
    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    Dems should just forfeit and look toward the Draft rather than continue the charade.

    I guess if you're a fucking retard, you needed Jack Nicholson or Sir Lawrence Olivier to play the Bob Mueller role. He was never going to be the prop for impeachment. It's for Congress to act or not. Politically, it's probably better to let the American people impeach Trump. Whores like Rudy and Barr are helping Daddy run out the clock and that's okay. President Pence would be just as embarrassing and probably a more competent force for evil.
    You seem to put a lot of stock in the polls that have some Dems with slim leads if the election was tomorrow.
    I take nothing for granted and I don't underestimate the idiocy of the American people.

    After years of pseudo-scandals and conspiracy theories, the brain dead among us can no longer identify a plain as day felony. Those of you who want an above-the-law strongman for President would also have been contented sheep under Stalin.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,220
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    salemcoog said:

    HHusky said:

    Dems should just forfeit and look toward the Draft rather than continue the charade.

    I guess if you're a fucking retard, you needed Jack Nicholson or Sir Lawrence Olivier to play the Bob Mueller role. He was never going to be the prop for impeachment. It's for Congress to act or not. Politically, it's probably better to let the American people impeach Trump. Whores like Rudy and Barr are helping Daddy run out the clock and that's okay. President Pence would be just as embarrassing and probably a more competent force for evil.
    You seem to put a lot of stock in the polls that have some Dems with slim leads if the election was tomorrow.
    I take nothing for granted and I don't underestimate the idiocy of the American people.

    After years of pseudo-scandals and conspiracy theories, the brain dead among us can no longer identify a plain as day felony. Those of you who want an above-the-law strongman for President would also have been contented sheep under Stalin.
    Such drama queen H.


    Take your L, take a week off.






    Then cancel your subscription. You're moar a fit for Reddit.
    You girls cry all the time about disrespect for "American exceptionalism". Then you ridicule the ideals that inhabit the concept. Deplorable? Yes.
  • Options
    2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I was wrong but it was a disappointment all the same

    he 1998 United States Senate elections were a even contest between the Republican and Democratic parties. While the Democrats had to defend more seats up for election, Republican attacks on the morality of President Bill Clinton failed to connect with voters and anticipated Republican gains did not materialize. The Republicans picked up open seats in Ohio and Kentucky and narrowly defeated Democratic incumbent Carol Moseley Braun (Illinois), but these were cancelled out by the Democrats' gain of an open seat in Indiana and defeats of Republican Senators Al D'Amato (New York) and Lauch Faircloth (North Carolina). The balance of the Senate remained unchanged at 55–45 in favor of the Republicans. With Democrats gaining five seats in the House of Representatives, this marked the first time since 1934 that the out-of-presidency party failed to gain congressional seats in a mid-term election, and the first time since 1822 that the party not in control of the White House failed to gain seats in the mid-term election of a President's second term. These are the last senate elections that resulted in no net change in the balance of power.

    Agreed that backfired for the GOP. Like I said, there is no smoking gun on Trump's actions. It's all whether they can get him under oath to lie. I'm not even saying I agree with that strategy. It's just the reality of the situation. The other reality is Democrats are too big of pussies to do anything anyways.
    Hi there.
    You said no one

    You lied

    The sun rose in the east
    Right.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,827
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club


    Presented without comment.

    Ouch.


    @dflea
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,220
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Not voting for Hillary was an act of voting for a guy who claimed to hate the right people. It was a petulant vote.

    Even if you disagreed with her, as P.J. O'Rourke famously said in endorsing her, "She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited July 2019
    Imagine celebrating the fact that since only 3% of the population actually read a report which details multiple acts of obstruction and collusion it's allowed the AG and conservative media to successfully run interference. Nixon is rolling over in his grave as if he had an AG like Barr and Fox News no way would he have had to resign....but congrats Trumptards!
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,827
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    GDS said:

    Imagine celebrating the fact that since only 3% of the population actually read a report which details multiple acts of obstruction and collusion it's allowed the AG and conservative media to successfully run interference. Nixon is rolling over in his grave as if he had an AG like Barr and Fox News no way would he have had to resign....but congrats Trumptards!

    Speaking of Nixon rolling over in his grave ... tell us more about the subsequent events to the Steele Dossier
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,557
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    GDS said:

    Imagine celebrating the fact that since only 3% of the population actually read a report which details multiple acts of obstruction and collusion it's allowed the AG and conservative media to successfully run interference. Nixon is rolling over in his grave as if he had an AG like Barr and Fox News no way would he have had to resign....but congrats Trumptards!

    Here's another chance to tell us Scott

    Multiple acts? Go
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited July 2019
    GDS said:

    Imagine celebrating the fact that since only 3% of the population actually read a report which details multiple acts of obstruction and collusion it's allowed the AG and conservative media to successfully run interference. Nixon is rolling over in his grave as if he had an AG like Barr and Fox News no way would he have had to resign....but congrats Trumptards!

    The Rats have the House and the full support of 90% of the Media. If they can't get their message out why are you blaming Barr and Fox News? So far Barr has come off as more truthful and with more integrity than the sainted Mueller. I why didn't I hear anything yesterday about how the redactions are hiding all of the "real" crimes that were committed?
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    And oh yeah, you never showed that I lied you fucking worthless piece of shit.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Not voting for Hillary was an act of voting for a guy who claimed to hate the right people. It was a petulant vote.

    Even if you disagreed with her, as P.J. O'Rourke famously said in endorsing her, "She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

    That's a self serving diaphanous point of view that makes the holder of such views feel better by marginalizing those who voted for Trump and/or against Hillary Clinton. Newsflash, Hillary Clinton wasn't just "wrong about absolutely everything".
    Bingo, and you said it much better than I.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,220
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Not voting for Hillary was an act of voting for a guy who claimed to hate the right people. It was a petulant vote.

    Even if you disagreed with her, as P.J. O'Rourke famously said in endorsing her, "She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

    That's a self serving diaphanous point of view that makes the holder of such views feel better by marginalizing those who voted for Trump and/or against Hillary Clinton. Newsflash, Hillary Clinton wasn't just "wrong about absolutely everything".
    The guy who ran on hating immigrants really has no larger idea.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Not voting for Hillary was an act of voting for a guy who claimed to hate the right people. It was a petulant vote.

    Even if you disagreed with her, as P.J. O'Rourke famously said in endorsing her, "She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

    That's a self serving diaphanous point of view that makes the holder of such views feel better by marginalizing those who voted for Trump and/or against Hillary Clinton. Newsflash, Hillary Clinton wasn't just "wrong about absolutely everything".
    The guy who ran on hating immigrants really has no larger idea.
    When you have to lie in order to make your point, it might be on account of the fact you don't really have a point.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,557
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Not voting for Hillary was an act of voting for a guy who claimed to hate the right people. It was a petulant vote.

    Even if you disagreed with her, as P.J. O'Rourke famously said in endorsing her, "She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters."

    That's a self serving diaphanous point of view that makes the holder of such views feel better by marginalizing those who voted for Trump and/or against Hillary Clinton. Newsflash, Hillary Clinton wasn't just "wrong about absolutely everything".
    The guy who ran on hating immigrants really has no larger idea.
    If you have to lie for years to make your point you don't have a point
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,911
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    SFGbob said:

    Whenever the voters don’t support O’Keefed’s preferred candidate they are idiots.

    Not supporting Hillary was an act of intelligence and patriotism.

    Your belief in your own intellectual supremacy isn’t supported by the record Mr. Hands up don’t shoot.

    Walk the safety up to the line of scrimmage.

Sign In or Register to comment.