What exactly is wrong with the article? Hannity said he wasn't going on stage. He went on stage. Fox news said he shouldn't have and it's been taken care of.
What exactly is wrong with the article? Hannity said he wasn't going on stage. He went on stage. Fox news said he shouldn't have and it's been taken care of.
Seems to be factual reporting to me.
"The show onstage might well have been called Fox & Friend."
"The participation of the Fox hosts in a political rally struck even executives at the network as inappropriate."
There's more than that. It's written like a grousing column rather than a news piece.
What exactly is wrong with the article? Hannity said he wasn't going on stage. He went on stage. Fox news said he shouldn't have and it's been taken care of.
Seems to be factual reporting to me.
"The show onstage might well have been called Fox & Friend."
"The participation of the Fox hosts in a political rally struck even executives at the network as inappropriate."
There's more than that. It's written like a grousing column rather than a news piece.
The first one is a shitty attempt at humor. Second one is factual and relevant.
Comments
Needlessly snarky article. Come on, it reads like HuffPo.
Seems to be factual reporting to me.
Probably swing the election to a blue wave
"The participation of the Fox hosts in a political rally struck even executives at the network as inappropriate."
There's more than that. It's written like a grousing column rather than a news piece.
When is TV not media?
I get ALL my news from the Tug.
And the Applebees Facebook page.