Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
In a fantasy land where Pete comes to his senses...
bananasnblondes
Member Posts: 15,112
...and brings in an EXPERIENCED OC he can hand the keys to Eason and the rest of the offense to...
Who are some possibilities?
(Besides Sark)
Who are some possibilities?
(Besides Sark)
Comments
Hire PGOS
Hire whoever Purdue's OC is
You're an idiot
It's Brohm's offense at Purdue to start with ... and you're talking about the same Purdue team that scored 13 points yesterday
I may be an idiot, but I look like Einstein compared to you. Ask anyone.
On Purdue, I didnt see their score yesterday so Ill concede that point. I did see them take Ohio State to the woodshed with balance. Brohm doesnt call the plays.
I like Purdue and what they are doing a lot ... but I'm not sure going full spread is the answer for where we are as a program.
It's also not overly complicated horseshit.
But I'm a guy that likes an offense with a great running game and running backs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Horton
https://goaztecs.com/staff.aspx?staff=354
SDSU beat both of the Pac12 teams last year that we lost to.
Not really everything, we actually started only doing stupid stuff 50% of the time as the season has progressed.
What I can tell from Hamden's philosophy this year is as follows:
- Strength of the team are the RBs
- Browning is going to make a handful of really bad decisions per game - minimize what he's asked to do
- WRs are largely average depending on what kind of growth Ty Jones would make
- TEs more good blockers than great receivers without Hunter Bryant
- Have a good defense that is going to minimize points allowed so don't give up short fields through mistakes
In the end, he's called games tied to the above. There's an emphasis on the run and taking things out of Jake's hands. Jake's shown to be pissed about this and the frustration there has hit the boiling point. Fuller has disappeared in both the Oregon and Cal games.I don't think going spread this year would be the answer because it'd move more of the emphasis away from the team's strength.
Now looking forward to next year ... still will have some good RBs but will have a far more talented receiving group if for no other reason than everybody being a year older. I could see a little more spreading of the field next year with a QB that will likely be trusted to make throws throughout the field.
I tend to fall under the umbrella that we have some player issues this year that limit what we are able to do starting on the OL and extending to the QB position. We're behind last year's offensive numbers but not materially.
I get that Hamden's trying SOMETHING here ... it's still FS though because at some point EVERYBODY knows that we're trying SOMETHING
It's fair to get on him for that ... goes back to what I was saying about knowing your own tendencies and breaking them.
Gilby, Uncle Denny, Mike Price and 1.5L of Old Grand-dad would produce better results than this shit.
#snohomeys
You dont need a running QB to do spread varients. When this offense is at it's best this year we are spreading the field and running Gaskin or finding the open receiver.
The problem with this offense we have now is it takes things from spread, west coast, pro style, power, boise state motion, trickeration...but everything is half baked. Stick to one or two things and do them well.