First of all the guy never "changed" he was liberal squish before he is a liberal squish now.
I believed simultaneously that Christine Blasey Ford was a credible accuser, that Kavanaugh was owed a certain presumption of innocence,
On what basis exactly was Ford credible? Her story where everyone she said was at the party denied any memory of the party including her best friend who said she had never met Kavanaugh? Or was it the part about how she couldn't recall the date, the location or how she got to the party and how she got home from the party that made her story so credible?
Or maybe it was her lies about having a fear of flying or the need for two front doors in her house that made her story credible? There was nothing credible about her story.
First of all the guy never "changed" he was liberal squish before he is a liberal squish now.
I believed simultaneously that Christine Blasey Ford was a credible accuser, that Kavanaugh was owed a certain presumption of innocence,
On what basis exactly was Ford credible? Her story where everyone she said was at the party denied any memory of the party including her best friend who said she had never met Kavanaugh? Or was it the part about how she couldn't recall the date, the location or how she got to the party and how she got home from the party that made her story so credible?
Or maybe it was her lies about having a fear of flying or the need for two front doors in her house that made her story credible? There was nothing credible about her story.
As some gal said last night - her story was incredibly credible
And the FBI didn't investigate enough
That's the narrative going forth. No need for any facts on how it was credible
First of all the guy never "changed" he was liberal squish before he is a liberal squish now.
I believed simultaneously that Christine Blasey Ford was a credible accuser, that Kavanaugh was owed a certain presumption of innocence,
On what basis exactly was Ford credible? Her story where everyone she said was at the party denied any memory of the party including her best friend who said she had never met Kavanaugh? Or was it the part about how she couldn't recall the date, the location or how she got to the party and how she got home from the party that made her story so credible?
Or maybe it was her lies about having a fear of flying or the need for two front doors in her house that made her story credible? There was nothing credible about her story.
Triggered? Who's the Kunt who listened to some middle aged woman talking in a baby voice about a sexual assault she supposedly experienced 30 plus years ago who had absolutely zero evidence in support of and who's best friend refuted the story she was telling and found her story credible? That's the person who sounds triggered. You and he actually believe a story that has zero evidence in support of it purely because it triggered your sore snatches.
Triggered? Who's the Kunt who listened to some middle aged woman talking in a baby voice about a sexual assault she supposedly experienced 30 plus years ago who had absolutely zero evidence in support of and who's best friend refuted the story she was telling and found her story credible? That's the person who sounds triggered. You and he actually believe a story that has zero evidence in support of it purely because it triggered your sore snatches.
You don't know how to read. And nice rant. Triggered bitch.
Triggered? Who's the Kunt who listened to some middle aged woman talking in a baby voice about a sexual assault she supposedly experienced 30 plus years ago who had absolutely zero evidence in support of and who's best friend refuted the story she was telling and found her story credible? That's the person who sounds triggered. You and he actually believe a story that has zero evidence in support of it purely because it triggered your sore snatches.
You don't know how to read. And nice rant. Triggered bitch.
Hondo's go to Kunt act when he can't back up his mouth. Tell us why she was "credible" Kunt.
I believed simultaneously that Christine Blasey Ford was a credible accuser, that Kavanaugh was owed a certain presumption of innocence, and that the right thing for the White House to do was withdraw the nomination
Liar liar pants on fire.
You can’t presume Kavanaugh was innocent and also carry out the penalty.
Ford wasn’t credible. Period. Feinstein rolled the political dice that she could find a couple pussy Republicans and lost.
Dems are still in denial and are riding the wrong horse again. (Hilary back in the spotlight - dumbasses)
Comments
WDWHA
I believed simultaneously that Christine Blasey Ford was a credible accuser, that Kavanaugh was owed a certain presumption of innocence,
On what basis exactly was Ford credible? Her story where everyone she said was at the party denied any memory of the party including her best friend who said she had never met Kavanaugh? Or was it the part about how she couldn't recall the date, the location or how she got to the party and how she got home from the party that made her story so credible?
Or maybe it was her lies about having a fear of flying or the need for two front doors in her house that made her story credible? There was nothing credible about her story.
And the FBI didn't investigate enough
That's the narrative going forth. No need for any facts on how it was credible
He is pajama boy with a tie.
It's not working
Liar liar pants on fire.
You can’t presume Kavanaugh was innocent and also carry out the penalty.
Ford wasn’t credible. Period. Feinstein rolled the political dice that she could find a couple pussy Republicans and lost.
Dems are still in denial and are riding the wrong horse again. (Hilary back in the spotlight - dumbasses)