Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSiO Podcast #57: Are we fine enough? Are we wild enough?

2

Comments

  • NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425
    "Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,291 Founders Club
    edited October 2018

    "Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.

    Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.

    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,972
    edited October 2018
    Did I get a shout out
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    You got @MrsPetersen ... the gauntlet has been thrown...
  • NorwegianHuskyNorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,425
    PurpleJ said:

    "Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.

    Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.

    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    We lost two games this year. Fuck off.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    PurpleJ said:

    "Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.

    Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.

    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    Flagged. Bashing @NorwegianHusky is ok, but bashing teenage dick is not
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Welcome to three years ago.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Four pillars. We do a lot to maximize the guys we sign. Pete has always punched above his talent weight. He is currently recruiting like a cruiserweight in the heavyweights now though. Our top classes are super middleweight.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    Mad_Son said:

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Four pillars. We do a lot to maximize the guys we sign. Pete has always punched above his talent weight. He is currently recruiting like a cruiserweight in the heavyweights now though. Our top classes are super middleweight.
    We are Wisconsin who can beat BYE!
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club

    You got @MrsPetersen ... the gauntlet has been thrown...

    When are you gonna get @YellowSnow? Or better yet Pumpy?
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,291 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    "Recruiting is getting your targets" - someone please explain this to J for me, because I'm getting bored of him constantly tagging me in his Bonerpop ball gargling sessions.

    Our on field results say fuck your obsession with teenage dicks.

    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    @NorwegianHusky
    We lost two games this year. Fuck off.
    But the running backs looks GOOD. So YOU fuck off pedobear.
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180

    Mad_Son said:

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Four pillars. We do a lot to maximize the guys we sign. Pete has always punched above his talent weight. He is currently recruiting like a cruiserweight in the heavyweights now though. Our top classes are super middleweight.
    We are Wisconsin who can beat BYE!
    But with a deficient gameday experience.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,438 Founders Club
    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Four pillars. We do a lot to maximize the guys we sign. Pete has always punched above his talent weight. He is currently recruiting like a cruiserweight in the heavyweights now though. Our top classes are super middleweight.
    We are Wisconsin who can beat BYE!
    But with a deficient gameday experience.
    Bruh, I have many row boat frens who went to HS in Madison and would regale me with tails of how great the place is. Hell, you can get a beer on at their HUB on the lake. How can we compete with this?
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180
    edited October 2018

    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    I though the comment about what Sark would do with the current roster spot on. This is a 4-5 or 5-4 in conference team under Sark.

    Also, I know we need to get good athletes at every position group, but not all groups are created equal. OL, DL and QB recruiting Uber Alles!!!! Some kind of German you were Herr Stausser.

    I have hope though with Scottalica and Malloe fucking skrong know that, at least, Pete understands what needs to happen. Fucking eh, however, his process takes a long time. If Sark could get some decent front 7 guys that got us 2016's season, why couldn't we get the dudes we needed from 2015- 17?

    This is, in essence, why the MEAN rating of a class is so important.

    Because any one player might be better or worse than their rating, but because ratings are so positively correlated with on-field performance, you are always going to be tethered to that mean. You might get a bit of a coaching effect overall... but you are going tied to that mean rating.

    So, the guys like Gaines, Dissly, Pettis, Sid that punched above their weight are offset by the fact that some higher guys didn’t pan out (Hale, KJ) and lower guys were true to their ratings (Sosebee).

    So at first it appeared Pete was a genius getting guys like Sid and Dante and Greg. But in the end you see the saddest story in the history of life which is good ole regression to the mean.
    None of Pete's (per 247 composite) first 3 classes were top 25 and yet here we are as basically a top 10- 15 team depending on how the ball bounces. One would think that if he can stack a few to 10- 15 classes then we are playing CFP level football.
    Four pillars. We do a lot to maximize the guys we sign. Pete has always punched above his talent weight. He is currently recruiting like a cruiserweight in the heavyweights now though. Our top classes are super middleweight.
    We are Wisconsin who can beat BYE!
    But with a deficient gameday experience.
    Bruh, I have many row boat frens who went to HS in Madison and would regale me with tails of how great the place is. Hell, you can get a beer on at their HUB on the lake. How can we compete with this?
    That's where I met my wife. Washington offers nothing that can compare.

    The only thing UWus has over UWthem is E1. It is nice having a huge accessible space. By contrast in madison while all of the small lots are available for tailgating, the majority of work is done in the surrounding neighborhoods which are one giant party. All of the area bars are hopping and turn their parking lots into a tailgate environment.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    Wisconsin played in Seattle in 1992 and brought the whole band. They did the post game thing with the band at venerable Husky Stadium

    They had just hired Alverez and were considered a cupcake but the DAWGS got booed for only winning by two or three TDs

    Alverez backed out of the return game which would have been the year of his first Rose Bowl

    He didn't believe I guess. They would have won rather easily
Sign In or Register to comment.