Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The lessons of fauxcahontas

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,298 Standard Supporter

Anyone with a brain and a shred of honesty and integrity knew that blond hair blue eyed fauxcahontas was not by any definition an American Indian. The leftards running Harvard Law were so interested in checking the box that they had a real redskin on their faculty that they were willing to pretend they had one and then revel in the moral superiority that this gave to them. So, Trump calls the leftard bluff on fauxcahontas being an Indian and the leftards and MSM get upset with Trump for telling the truth. Just like lefards get upset when confronted with the fake news label.



So, fauxcahontas gets a DNA test which says she has a less than 1% of the DNA of either American or South American Indian blood. No tribal membership, no Indian cultural heritage – nothing but a fraction of a percent of some sort of Indian blood. The leftards proclaim this is proof that fauxcahontas is an American Indian and therefore Trump loses his $1 million bet. In the real world, normal people realize how shameful this is and how bad a light it shines on the whole AA fraud. You think Harvard and our supposed intellectual elite actually care about real American Indians? The Cherokees certainly found out that the left was happy to “borrow” some Cherokee authenticity to make white leftards feel good.



So, are we all now Indians now for AA purposes? Is that what the left is implying? Of course not. Ask any leftard to define black for purposes of AA and you will get spit for a response. Are Tiger Woods kids eligible for special privileges because they are “black”? Like climate change, AA is core principle for leftards and yet they can’t answer the most basic questions about what their principles mean in the real world.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.