Washington, Arizona St, and UCLA Since 2009

Tequilla

The facts are damning ... even if you concede the fact that Sark is a good coach to those that want to argue that he is, the reality is that there are coaches doing a BETTER job in the conference:

Conference record and relative standing in the PAC since 2009:



Washington:



2009: 4-5 (7th of 10 teams)

2010: 5-4 (t-3rd of 10 teams)

2011: 5-4 (3rd in North, t-4th of 12 teams)

2012: 5-4 (4th in North, t-5th of 12 teams)

2013: 3-4 (t-4th in North, t-7th of 12 teams)



Arizona State:



2009: 2-7 (9th of 10 teams)

2010: 4-5 (t-5th of 10 teams)

2011: 4-5 (3rd in South, t-6th of 12 teams)

2012: 5-4 (t-2nd in South, t-5th of 12 teams)

2013: 6-1 (1st in South, t-1st of 12 teams)



UCLA:



2009: 3-6 (8th of 10 teams)

2010: 2-7 (9th of 10 teams)

2011: 5-4 (2nd in South, t-4th of 12 teams)

2012: 6-3 (1st in South, t-3rd of 12 teams)

2013: 5-2 (t-2nd in South, t-4th of 12 teams)

MikeDamone

UCLA isn't a fair comparison because the weather is better and the program recruits itself.

CuntWaffle

Arizona State gets a bunch of free wins every year because of the altitude and the heat. Not really fair to compare UW to them.

dnc

You act like owen12 never happened

greenblood

You guys still don't know the damage Ty did

bananasnblondes

Did Graham or Mora start at 0-12 and have a player who said football wasn't fun anymore? I dont think so. Nice try.