Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kavanaugh fight shows us that Washington is sick. Very sick.

2

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202

    SFGbob said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Sexual assault is a crime. Thanks for playing dumbass. You and Hondo must be in some kind of competition for the stupidest person who posts here.
    Ironic post of the day!

    Second in a week. You’re on a roll gay bob!
    I think you just took the lead. So it's "ironic" that you're a dumbass. Kind of makes my point.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Sexual assault is a crime. Thanks for playing dumbass. You and Hondo must be in some kind of competition for the stupidest person who posts here.
    Ironic post of the day!

    Second in a week. You’re on a roll gay bob!
    I think you just took the lead. So it's "ironic" that you're a dumbass. Kind of makes my point.
    Race says you make “good” arguments.

    This makes my point about both of you.

    Thanks for that.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202

    SFGbob said:

    BearsWiin said:

    It's not the people, it's the rules. Rules determine behavior and outcomes. You want better representation, change the rules by which the representatives operate. You throw everybody out and get new ones in there, they'll operate under the same constraints and incentives as the old group.

    Start with competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform

    I have an idea, instead of constantly looking for angles to lead us why don't we just limit the power and reach of the Federal Government and then we wouldn't need to concern ourselves so much with the rules or how sick DC. If Congress and the Federal bureaucracy didn't have the ability to impact all of our lives so directly you wouldn't have people throwing so much money at politicians in order sway their votes and pass their legislation.

    Corrupt, greedy, and incompetent people will always be with us, why not limit the government's power so that when this people get into position power they aren't able to do as much damage as they are able to do now?
    Agree. Trump is a buffoon. When do we “burn it down??” There’s no proposal on the table to shut down DC. Why not? EPA, education, energy, ICE, homeland security, FCC... etc. the sooner we shut it down the better. It’s a central pillar of trumpism and I support it. The lack of follow through and inefficiency is just shocking.

    You got fucking duped (not surprised).
    Since I didn't vote for Trump just how exactly did I get duped? Second of all, I never heard Trump ever say "burn it down" nor did I ever believe that Trump was a limited government Conservative. Appears the person who was "duped" was you. But as one of the dumbest people to post here, that probably happens a lot to you.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,202

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Sexual assault is a crime. Thanks for playing dumbass. You and Hondo must be in some kind of competition for the stupidest person who posts here.
    Ironic post of the day!

    Second in a week. You’re on a roll gay bob!
    I think you just took the lead. So it's "ironic" that you're a dumbass. Kind of makes my point.
    Race says you make “good” arguments.

    This makes my point about both of you.

    Thanks for that.
    Stupid people rarely recognize how stupid they are. Tell me again how I was "duped" dumbass.
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    BearsWiin said:

    It's not the people, it's the rules. Rules determine behavior and outcomes. You want better representation, change the rules by which the representatives operate. You throw everybody out and get new ones in there, they'll operate under the same constraints and incentives as the old group.

    Start with competitive redistricting and campaign finance reform

    I have an idea, instead of constantly looking for angles to lead us why don't we just limit the power and reach of the Federal Government and then we wouldn't need to concern ourselves so much with the rules or how sick DC. If Congress and the Federal bureaucracy didn't have the ability to impact all of our lives so directly you wouldn't have people throwing so much money at politicians in order sway their votes and pass their legislation.

    Corrupt, greedy, and incompetent people will always be with us, why not limit the government's power so that when this people get into position power they aren't able to do as much damage as they are able to do now?
    Agree. Trump is a buffoon. When do we “burn it down??” There’s no proposal on the table to shut down DC. Why not? EPA, education, energy, ICE, homeland security, FCC... etc. the sooner we shut it down the better. It’s a central pillar of trumpism and I support it. The lack of follow through and inefficiency is just shocking.

    You got fucking duped (not surprised).
    Since I didn't vote for Trump just how exactly did I get duped? Second of all, I never heard Trump ever say "burn it down" nor did I ever believe that Trump was a limited government Conservative. Appears the person who was "duped" was you. But as one of the dumbest people to post here, that probably happens a lot to you.
    So you don’t support trump and centralized DC power? Which is it bob?

    Why won’t trump cut the power, authority and funding of the federal government?
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,146 Standard Supporter

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    All the ones of which he’s never been charged. Take your pick.

  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Kav not on trial. He is next Supreme Court judge.

    What’s the question?

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    All the ones of which he’s never been charged. Take your pick.

    You are replying to secdawg? Correct? Because “kav” is not charged with anything. Only secdawg and you seem to be implying otherwise.

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Kav not on trial. He is next Supreme Court judge.

    What’s the question?

    Is he innocent or is he not on trial? Can't be both.
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    All the ones of which he’s never been charged. Take your pick.

    You are replying to secdawg? Correct? Because “kav” is not charged with anything. Only secdawg and you seem to be implying otherwise.

    Huh? Not me.

    Js he is next Supreme Court justice
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,146 Standard Supporter

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    All the ones of which he’s never been charged. Take your pick.

    You are replying to secdawg? Correct? Because “kav” is not charged with anything. Only secdawg and you seem to be implying otherwise.

    Not really. Go read again.
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    2001400ex said:

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Kav not on trial. He is next Supreme Court judge.

    What’s the question?

    Is he innocent or is he not on trial? Can't be both.

    Huh? Saying he sipping Mai Tai’s waiting on this shit show to be over, over.
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    Dam CD, nothing complicated. He next Supreme Court justice. That is all. Just need that old hag to kill off so Trump can admit another
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    All the ones of which he’s never been charged. Take your pick.

    You are replying to secdawg? Correct? Because “kav” is not charged with anything. Only secdawg and you seem to be implying otherwise.

    Not really. Go read again.
    -———-
    Kav is on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    ———-

    All of the crimes he’s never been charged with. Take your pick

    ———-

    Ok. LOL. You are correct.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SECDAWG said:

    Dam CD, nothing complicated. He next Supreme Court justice. That is all. Just need that old hag to kill off so Trump can admit another

    photo 16992021-6465-4D50-A97B-DD692E15D06F_zpsemplo95r.gif
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,206
    Sledog said:

    Americas founders made a critical mistake by not including a mechanism in the Constitution for removing the entire power apparatus (every member Congress and the Senate) simultaneously when it become irreparably corrupted. We need to flush the shit, all of it, and start again with a whole new roster of fresh faces.

    They did it's the 2nd Amendment,
    Christ.
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    2001400ex said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Dam CD, nothing complicated. He next Supreme Court justice. That is all. Just need that old hag to kill off so Trump can admit another

    photo 16992021-6465-4D50-A97B-DD692E15D06F_zpsemplo95r.gif

    Huh? Coke??
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    Sledog said:

    Americas founders made a critical mistake by not including a mechanism in the Constitution for removing the entire power apparatus (every member Congress and the Senate) simultaneously when it become irreparably corrupted. We need to flush the shit, all of it, and start again with a whole new roster of fresh faces.

    They did it's the 2nd Amendment,
    Christ.
    He’s right creepy..it’s the only thing that u can fight back with, die or not..

  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Kav not on trial. He is next Supreme Court judge.

    What’s the question?

    Now thinking it’s Unlikely a vote will occur inside a week. If a vote does occur, Kavanaugh will lose.

    Too much dilly, dilly
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004

    SECDAWG said:

    SECDAWG said:

    Kav is innocent. FO

    Do you think kav is on on trial?

    What crime is he innocent of?
    Kav not on trial. He is next Supreme Court judge.

    What’s the question?

    Now thinking it’s Unlikely a vote will occur inside a week. If a vote does occur, Kavanaugh will lose.

    Too much dilly, dilly
    Kav will b approved

Sign In or Register to comment.