Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DE Conundrum Solved

AEBAEB Member Posts: 2,971
The great UW defensive formation debate has been solved. Per Jimmy NoBallz in the Athletic.com:

‘“We want to get more sacks. We want to get more turnovers,” Lake said. “Sacks change the game. … It’s not just on the outside linebackers. It’s not just on the defensive ends. It’s on everybody. … It’s a constant with our defense — how are we going to get turnovers and how are we going to get sacks?”‘
Tagged:

Comments

  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to
  • AEBAEB Member Posts: 2,971

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    Great point. Apparently he’s blaming the as yet to be recruited DEs for their lack of Heat from the Edge.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    That was just a TSIO bored theory, no one connected to UW ever said anything about that happening.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    That was just a TSIO bored theory, no one connected to UW ever said anything about that happening.
    roof had puff piece about it, sorry to lazy to go find it for you
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    That was just a TSIO bored theory, no one connected to UW ever said anything about that happening.
    It all stemmed from his (ultimately ineffective) tweets at Jeremiah Martin. I think he recruits every key piece on defense now. Just not as a primary recruiter. I know he's on Smalls as well.
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    That was just a TSIO bored theory, no one connected to UW ever said anything about that happening.
    It all stemmed from his (ultimately ineffective) tweets at Jeremiah Martin. I think he recruits every key piece on defense now. Just not as a primary recruiter. I know he's on Smalls as well.
    So when can we start hating Lake for not getting blue chip BUCKs/ rush ends?
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Passion said:

    wasnt lake supposed to chip in on DE recruiting? wtf is he up to

    That was just a TSIO bored theory, no one connected to UW ever said anything about that happening.
    It all stemmed from his (ultimately ineffective) tweets at Jeremiah Martin. I think he recruits every key piece on defense now. Just not as a primary recruiter. I know he's on Smalls as well.
    So when can we start hating Lake for not getting blue chip BUCKs/ rush ends?
    The thing is: we can't. The primary recruiter in the modern landscape is always going to be the position coach. The fact that K cannot connect with ANYONE (white, black, poly, etc) is the issue. White guys don't come here, black guys don't come here. The only hope is that we can sneak through a Poly kid who is connected to Malloe, other Polys or their parents want their kid to play for Pete (as they should).

    Recruiting is about making a connection with the kid where you get a hook in them. You can see it when it happens.

    They bite the hook hard and then just don't get off it. I can give a million examples, but look at fucking Bandes. Just - boom. He liked us, then he really started considering: that was it. He was on the hook. He gave a look elsewhere, but we were it.

    Contrast that with anyone K recruits or Foskey - these are guys that change their top 5 constantly, say polite things and their family loves it... but you can tell they are just looking at the hook; they don't hit it.
Sign In or Register to comment.