So revisiting that first play against utah on the pod, I've come up with a new theory - while Petersen is prone to those sorts of shenanigans I don't think he did it just for the sake of being clever. I think he was trying to manufacture a big play and light a fire since we're a slow starting team. While the impact was exact opposite and put us in a hole I think this was an attempt to address a very specific issue. Of course it is obvious that explosive plays aren't manufactured by just calling a bubble, reverse, or bomb, but are a natural outcome of executing against weaknesses that exist in the defense.
So revisiting that first play against utah on the pod, I've come up with a new theory - while Petersen is prone to those sorts of shenanigans I don't think he did it just for the sake of being clever. I think he was trying to manufacture a big play and light a fire since we're a slow starting team. While the impact was exact opposite and put us in a hole I think this was an attempt to address a very specific issue. Of course it is obvious that explosive plays aren't manufactured by just calling a bubble, reverse, or bomb, but are a natural outcome of executing against weaknesses that exist in the defense.
I get it, but the reason we start slow is that we—as a program—have no swag. I'm hopeful this will change with Jake leaving.
Or maybe Jake gets so angry at us that he actually starts to have a chip on his shoulder and gets some swag.
So revisiting that first play against utah on the pod, I've come up with a new theory - while Petersen is prone to those sorts of shenanigans I don't think he did it just for the sake of being clever. I think he was trying to manufacture a big play and light a fire since we're a slow starting team. While the impact was exact opposite and put us in a hole I think this was an attempt to address a very specific issue. Of course it is obvious that explosive plays aren't manufactured by just calling a bubble, reverse, or bomb, but are a natural outcome of executing against weaknesses that exist in the defense.
I get it, but the reason we start slow is that we—as a program—have no swag. I'm hopeful this will change with Jake leaving.
Or maybe Jake gets so angry at us that he actually starts to have a chip on his shoulder and gets some swag.
I agree completely. Pete doesn't want emotion, he wants robotic execution. Pete is effective Ty.
So revisiting that first play against utah on the pod, I've come up with a new theory - while Petersen is prone to those sorts of shenanigans I don't think he did it just for the sake of being clever. I think he was trying to manufacture a big play and light a fire since we're a slow starting team. While the impact was exact opposite and put us in a hole I think this was an attempt to address a very specific issue. Of course it is obvious that explosive plays aren't manufactured by just calling a bubble, reverse, or bomb, but are a natural outcome of executing against weaknesses that exist in the defense.
I get it, but the reason we start slow is that we—as a program—have no swag. I'm hopeful this will change with Jake leaving.
Or maybe Jake gets so angry at us that he actually starts to have a chip on his shoulder and gets some swag.
I agree completely. Pete doesn't want emotion, he wants robotic execution. Pete is effective Ty.
* ASU gave the script to Stanford on offense; Stanford can execute it better and Shaw can be patient enough to stick with it. Plus, they'll have a size advantage at WR when they want to throw it * Keep the offense like ASU game; keep using TEs; I still think they should try Ahmed and Gaskin on the field at the same time; play to our? strengths * To borrow a line from Bart O'Kavanaugh, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone when I listen to the recruiting portion of the poadcast...in a good way
* ASU gave the script to Stanford on offense; Stanford can execute it better and Shaw can be patient enough to stick with it. Plus, they'll have a size advantage at WR when they want to throw it * Keep the offense like ASU game; keep using TEs; I still think they should try Ahmed and Gaskin on the field at the same time; play to our? strengths * To borrow a line from Bart O'Kavanaugh, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone when I listen to the recruiting portion of the poadcast...in a good way
Stanford already did this to us last year. Nothing's new with them.
* ASU gave the script to Stanford on offense; Stanford can execute it better and Shaw can be patient enough to stick with it. Plus, they'll have a size advantage at WR when they want to throw it * Keep the offense like ASU game; keep using TEs; I still think they should try Ahmed and Gaskin on the field at the same time; play to our? strengths * To borrow a line from Bart O'Kavanaugh, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone when I listen to the recruiting portion of the poadcast...in a good way
Stanford already did this to us last year. Nothing's new with them.
I was already having heart palpations over the possibility of Ford at WR and McCoy at OLB and now you are telling me there's a chance we might take Foskey as a LB too? And with To'To' still a possibility?
I was already having heart palpations over the possibility of Ford at WR and McCoy at OLB and now you are telling me there's a chance we might take Foskey as a LB too? And with To'To' still a possibility?
Don't die because I don't know how to record the pood.
I was already having heart palpations over the possibility of Ford at WR and McCoy at OLB and now you are telling me there's a chance we might take Foskey as a LB too? And with To'To' still a possibility?
McCoy is like a 5% shot. I won't say NO SHOT because USC is stepping all over their dick and I've heard the dad is literally in love with Coach Pete... but basically no shot.
Pretty much the same shit for Ford.
Foskey is running into the same problem with us that everyone else black does: 'yeah, objectively that's a great place, but I want a place that seems welcoming to people with two black parents'
To'oto'o is a hard call. From his top 5, I'd have to think we have the best shot.
I was already having heart palpations over the possibility of Ford at WR and McCoy at OLB and now you are telling me there's a chance we might take Foskey as a LB too? And with To'To' still a possibility?
Don't die because I don't know how to record the pood.
Don't worry, if anything our ratings will go up when the full cast is broadcasting from the spirit world. Only a matter of tim until you kill yourself after getting married to CLS.
Comments
Or maybe Jake gets so angry at us that he actually starts to have a chip on his shoulder and gets some swag.
Premature ejaculating doesn’t win games
Seen too many teams blow their wad and too many winners break their hearts
* Keep the offense like ASU game; keep using TEs; I still think they should try Ahmed and Gaskin on the field at the same time; play to our? strengths
* To borrow a line from Bart O'Kavanaugh, I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone when I listen to the recruiting portion of the poadcast...in a good way
The last few decades have been rough on me. I deserve this kind of world.
Pretty much the same shit for Ford.
Foskey is running into the same problem with us that everyone else black does: 'yeah, objectively that's a great place, but I want a place that seems welcoming to people with two black parents'
To'oto'o is a hard call. From his top 5, I'd have to think we have the best shot.