#metoo
Comments
-
Kavanaugh is an obvious piece of shit, but the GOP doesn't care.
If they had been smart enough to nominate another Gorsuch, the confirmation would already be complete. -
SCOTUS will operate just fine with 8 justices. It did for most of 2016. It can do so again.
-
Let the voters decide in November.CirrhosisDawg said:SCOTUS will operate just fine with 8 justices. It did for most of 2016. It can do so again.
-
LMAO I wasnt a kavanaugh supporter til I read this story he seemed too conservative
now hes starting to sound like a fun guy I hope he gets confirmed -
Methreesome
-
If I ran the GOP senate - I would ask Grassley to cancel the Thursday session and push forward the vote on Kava just to piss the press off then the demos.
A serious question, did anyone think that another allegation was not going to come out this weekend??
Unfortunately some here think Kava-naw is not a qualified jurist. -
I don't prefer my supreme court justices to rule based on politics. On either side. So pretty much anyone nominated isn't qualified at this point in time.LebamDawg said:If I ran the GOP senate - I would ask Grassley to cancel the Thursday session and push forward the vote on Kava just to piss the press off then the demos.
A serious question, did anyone think that another allegation was not going to come out this weekend??
Unfortunately some here think Kava-naw is not a qualified jurist. -
so who do you think votes more party lines - the women? or the last three men selected? I would love to see all justices rule on law and leave emotions out - that will never happen. I don't remember reading about one - since it sure as hell hasn't happened in my lifetime2001400ex said:
I don't prefer my supreme court justices to rule based on politics. On either side. So pretty much anyone nominated isn't qualified at this point in time.LebamDawg said:If I ran the GOP senate - I would ask Grassley to cancel the Thursday session and push forward the vote on Kava just to piss the press off then the demos.
A serious question, did anyone think that another allegation was not going to come out this weekend??
Unfortunately some here think Kava-naw is not a qualified jurist. -
What was your preference between 2008-2016?2001400ex said:
I don't prefer my supreme court justices to rule based on politics. On either side. So pretty much anyone nominated isn't qualified at this point in time.LebamDawg said:If I ran the GOP senate - I would ask Grassley to cancel the Thursday session and push forward the vote on Kava just to piss the press off then the demos.
A serious question, did anyone think that another allegation was not going to come out this weekend??
Unfortunately some here think Kava-naw is not a qualified jurist. -
To rule based on the Constitution. Little known fact, the majority of the decisions are 9-0 or 8-1. However shit like the Obamacare decision. 4 of the justices didn't read it and voted against it. 4 of them didn't read it and voted for it. Then it was left to one Justice to decide the fate of a key tenant of the bill. Rather than letting the Constitution, amendments, and precedent to determine the outcome.greenblood said:
What was your preference between 2008-2016?2001400ex said:
I don't prefer my supreme court justices to rule based on politics. On either side. So pretty much anyone nominated isn't qualified at this point in time.LebamDawg said:If I ran the GOP senate - I would ask Grassley to cancel the Thursday session and push forward the vote on Kava just to piss the press off then the demos.
A serious question, did anyone think that another allegation was not going to come out this weekend??
Unfortunately some here think Kava-naw is not a qualified jurist.