The second time those fucking pricks fucked us in a big game against Stanford. The first one was the famous Ertz out of bounds 'touchdown' and now this.
She's right, those fucking shit heads made the wrong call.
Still doesn't excuse the jackass, boneheaded mistakes.
The second time those fucking pricks fucked us in a big game against Stanford. The first one was the famous Ertz out of bounds 'touchdown' and now this.
She's right, those fucking shit heads made the wrong call.
Still doesn't excuse the jackass, boneheaded mistakes.
The second time those fucking pricks fucked us in a big game against Stanford. The first one was the famous Ertz out of bounds 'touchdown' and now this.
She's right, those fucking shit heads made the wrong call.
Still doesn't excuse the jackass, boneheaded mistakes.
They actually made the correct call on the pylon play:
Player Out of Bounds ARTICLE 1. a. A player is out of bounds when any part of his person touches anything, other than another player or game official, on or outside a boundary line (Rule 2-27-15) (A.R. 4-2-1-I and II). b. An out-of-bounds player who becomes airborne remains out of bounds until he touches the ground in bounds without simultaneously being out of bounds. c. A player who touches a pylon is out of bounds
The second time those fucking pricks fucked us in a big game against Stanford. The first one was the famous Ertz out of bounds 'touchdown' and now this.
She's right, those fucking shit heads made the wrong call.
Still doesn't excuse the jackass, boneheaded mistakes.
They actually made the correct call on the pylon play:
Player Out of Bounds ARTICLE 1. a. A player is out of bounds when any part of his person touches anything, other than another player or game official, on or outside a boundary line (Rule 2-27-15) (A.R. 4-2-1-I and II). b. An out-of-bounds player who becomes airborne remains out of bounds until he touches the ground in bounds without simultaneously being out of bounds. c. A player who touches a pylon is out of bounds
Yep. It's a really stupid rule, but that's the rule.
Yeah, I always thought the pylon was “the plane” so if an airborne player with possession hit the pylon he would have crossed “the plane”
Moot poont the next two plays though.
Also gifted Stanford in their next possession when ball carrier flew past pylon... every angle showed ball did not cross “the plane” before going out of bounds.
For that matter, non-PI calls in OT were bullshit.
Refs played bigger role in this gayme than they should have. Although, pylon call was correct.
Yeah, I always thought the pylon was “the plane” so if an airborne player with possession hit the pylon he would have crossed “the plane”
Moot poont the next two plays though.
Also gifted Stanford in their next possession when ball carrier flew past pylon... every angle showed ball did not cross “the plane” before going out of bounds.
For that matter, non-PI calls in OT were bullshit.
Refs played bigger role in this gayme than they should have. Although, pylon call was correct.
Quooks love to blame the refs when they were a yard away from a 31-7 lead over David Shaw Fucking Stupid.
Yeah, I always thought the pylon was “the plane” so if an airborne player with possession hit the pylon he would have crossed “the plane”
Moot poont the next two plays though.
Also gifted Stanford in their next possession when ball carrier flew past pylon... every angle showed ball did not cross “the plane” before going out of bounds.
For that matter, non-PI calls in OT were bullshit.
Refs played bigger role in this gayme than they should have. Although, pylon call was correct.
That was as good of a game as I have ever seen a Pac-12 crew call.
Oregon just gave it away. When the Ducks went up 17 they had to fuck up every key moment for the rest of the game to lose and they did. Stanford had to play perfectly and they did.
No excuses there. It was a well called game on both sides. Blatant fuck ups will lose you a ball game and it did.
As a fan the non-call PI in OT annoyed me as a dumbass fan, and the more rational side of me sez that it’s good that the refs just “let em play” during OT.
I’m not as down on Oregon as Moooster. I saw a lot to like last night.
As a fan the non-call PI in OT annoyed me as a dumbass fan, and the more rational side of me sez that it’s good that the refs just “let em play” during OT.
I’m not as down on Oregon as Moooster. I saw a lot to like last night.
I'm not down on Oregon at all, I just know what they are. They have the best QB and O-line in the conference, a gaggle of green running backs, and an even bigger gaggle of mediocre WR's.
The front seven is as good as anyone's in the conference and the DB's are flat out awful. 2002 bad.
They couldn't play any better than they did yesterday. The line and front seven dominated but the center had some major fuck ups. The secondary was absolutely atrocious and the runnings backs ended up fumbling the game away.
It's an 8 or 9 win team in a really bad conference. That has always been the narrative.
I bet she hate fucks like a mad banshee after a loss like that.
That's what we're going to do to UW. Hate fuck your team and murder your QB, now that there isn't anything to play for now besides that, and improving the team. If the first half team shows up and plays all game, it can beat most of the top ranked teams in the country on any given Saturday.
The only reason you did anything at all to Stanford is because their secondary is garbage.
UW's secondary is exceptional if not elite. You can't run the ball on either team.
Mosster will fish again.
Truth
Eat shit. We ran the ball against Stanford just fine, and stuffed the run, and they're better than you. They don't have a shitty QB either like you have.
The only reason you did anything at all to Stanford is because their secondary is garbage.
UW's secondary is exceptional if not elite. You can't run the ball on either team.
Mosster will fish again.
Truth
Eat shit. We ran the ball against Stanford just fine, and stuffed the run, and they're better than you. They don't have a shitty QB either like you have.
The only reason you did anything at all to Stanford is because their secondary is garbage.
UW's secondary is exceptional if not elite. You can't run the ball on either team.
Mosster will fish again.
Truth
Eat shit. We ran the ball against Stanford just fine, and stuffed the run, and they're better than you. They don't have a shitty QB either like you have.
Oh okay.
Go find a coug thread to spew your vomit. You don't have a horse in this race. Leave UO vs UW to the quooks and the doogs. You are neither.
The only reason you did anything at all to Stanford is because their secondary is garbage.
UW's secondary is exceptional if not elite. You can't run the ball on either team.
Mosster will fish again.
Truth
Eat shit. We ran the ball against Stanford just fine, and stuffed the run, and they're better than you. They don't have a shitty QB either like you have.
This is what you said last season the week before we ? clownstomped your asses.
Comments
She's right, those fucking shit heads made the wrong call.
Still doesn't excuse the jackass, boneheaded mistakes.
@StrongArmCobra
@RuffaloSoldier
@Ice_Holmvik
Grace above all
Player Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 1. a. A player is out of bounds when any part of his person touches
anything, other than another player or game official, on or outside a boundary
line (Rule 2-27-15) (A.R. 4-2-1-I and II).
b. An out-of-bounds player who becomes airborne remains out of bounds
until he touches the ground in bounds without simultaneously being out
of bounds.
c. A player who touches a pylon is out of bounds
Moot poont the next two plays though.
Also gifted Stanford in their next possession when ball carrier flew past pylon... every angle showed ball did not cross “the plane” before going out of bounds.
For that matter, non-PI calls in OT were bullshit.
Refs played bigger role in this gayme than they should have. Although, pylon call was correct.
They do that.
Oregon just gave it away. When the Ducks went up 17 they had to fuck up every key moment for the rest of the game to lose and they did. Stanford had to play perfectly and they did.
No excuses there. It was a well called game on both sides. Blatant fuck ups will lose you a ball game and it did.
As a fan the non-call PI in OT annoyed me as a dumbass fan, and the more rational side of me sez that it’s good that the refs just “let em play” during OT.
I’m not as down on Oregon as Moooster. I saw a lot to like last night.
The front seven is as good as anyone's in the conference and the DB's are flat out awful. 2002 bad.
They couldn't play any better than they did yesterday. The line and front seven dominated but the center had some major fuck ups. The secondary was absolutely atrocious and the runnings backs ended up fumbling the game away.
It's an 8 or 9 win team in a really bad conference. That has always been the narrative.
UW's secondary is exceptional if not elite. You can't run the ball on either team.
Mosster will fish again.
Truth