Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

18-3

YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,670 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,035
    Jake pic touted? The fuck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    The Pac -9 sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    YellowSnow said:

    Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

    Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.

    Because Stanford has such a great home field advantage?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,670 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

    Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.

    Because Stanford has such a great home field advantage?
    Their crowd sucks but Stanford always seems to play especially well at home.

    We've tended to play them way better at home than down there- e.g., 2012 upset at Clink, close loss in 2014 and blowout win in 2016.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    YellowSnow said:

    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

    Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.

    Because Stanford has such a great home field advantage?
    Their crowd sucks but Stanford always seems to play especially well at home.

    We've tended to play them way better at home than down there- e.g., 2012 upset at Clink, close loss in 2014 and blowout win in 2016.
    Yeah it was weird. I was at least year's game and we were as loud as Stanford fans were. But yes they do play well at home.

    Regardless, with Jake and gaskin coming back, and Fuller and Jones developing. We shouldn't have an issue with a blitz. And 21 points against Utah is embarrassing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

    Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.

    Because Stanford has such a great home field advantage?
    Their crowd sucks but Stanford always seems to play especially well at home.

    We've tended to play them way better at home than down there- e.g., 2012 upset at Clink, close loss in 2014 and blowout win in 2016.
    Yeah it was weird. I was at least year's game and we were as loud as Stanford fans were. But yes they do play well at home.

    Regardless, with Jake and gaskin coming back, and Fuller and Jones developing. We shouldn't have an issue with a blitz. And 21 points against Utah is embarrassing.
    Did you watch us? play Utah?
    I did and that's why I had the comment I did. A 4 year starting QB and a 4 year starting RB should not have problems picking up the blitz like they did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Demand excellence, or napalm everything. Scorched Earth.

    Oh fuck off Boobs. You napalm everything regardless of the circumstances. Be true to yourself.
    I stole that from @Swaye
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,894
    2001400ex said:

    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    2001400ex said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Is our in conference record in our last 21 attempts. Remember when we would have all given our left nut to to have a respectable 6-3 type year? This team has a lot of flaws right now, QB and OL play chief amongst them, but we aren't going back to those dark days.

    Say it again with feeling: Stanford is a home game.

    Because Stanford has such a great home field advantage?
    Their crowd sucks but Stanford always seems to play especially well at home.

    We've tended to play them way better at home than down there- e.g., 2012 upset at Clink, close loss in 2014 and blowout win in 2016.
    Yeah it was weird. I was at least year's game and we were as loud as Stanford fans were. But yes they do play well at home.

    Regardless, with Jake and gaskin coming back, and Fuller and Jones developing. We shouldn't have an issue with a blitz. And 21 points against Utah is embarrassing.
    Did you watch us? play Utah?
    I did and that's why I had the comment I did. A 4 year starting QB and a 4 year starting RB should not have problems picking up the blitz like they did.
    Fuck. You’re just as clueless here as on the Tug. There were 3, sometimes 4 guys in Jakes grill when Uoote blitzed or sent 4. Jake nor Gaskin have no blame in that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.